Technical Papers
Nov 16, 2022

Developing Social Sustainability Knowledge and Cultural Proficiency among the Future Construction Workforce

Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 149, Issue 2

Abstract

The construction industry plays a critical role in economic growth, social progress, and environmental protection of communities worldwide to foster sustainable development. Although the construction industry has made significant improvements in environmental and economic sustainability in terms of promoting the adoption of renewable resources, low-carbon communities, and pro-environmental behavior, among others, there is a growing concern for lack of social sustainability in the industry. Social sustainability is a critical component of a community’s wellbeing and longevity, yet it is one of the least prioritized concepts in sustainability debates. One of the main causes of social sustainability issues in the construction industry is the lack of education and awareness among the workforce. To address the gap, this research introduces a three-step pedagogical approach in construction education to prepare students in the field by developing cultural proficiency, critical thinking skills, and non-biased verbal communication skills. The study conducted the following three interventions: (1) social media-based learning activity; (2) cocurricular learning (i.e., in-class expert training); and (3) combination of problem-based learning (PBL) and conceptual model development activity (i.e., active learning activity). Overall, 111 students from two consecutive semesters (i.e., summer 2021 and fall 2021) participated in the interventions in three construction management (CM) courses (i.e., Sustainable Construction, Principles of Construction, and Sustainable Approach to Construction) at a minority-serving institution. The research integrated a mixed-method approach through the systematic collection of quantitative and qualitative data using questionnaire surveys and concept maps. A Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis evaluated the quantitative data obtained from the workshop’s pre- and post-surveys, whereas the qualitative data were analyzed using sentiment analysis. The obtained results demonstrated the efficacy of the following three interventions: (1) improved collaboration among students through increasing their social network and sharing their perspectives, opinions, and graphical media content more efficiently; (2) increased students’ awareness about unconscious biases as well as intercultural, persuasive, and verbal communication skills; and (3) improved their ability to conceptualize ideas and determine the implications of their decisions through concept maps. The findings of this study contribute to two bodies of knowledge. First, they contribute to sustainable construction by encouraging the integration of more robust initiatives on social sustainability education. Additionally, this study also contributes to engineering and construction ethics education by increasing students’ awareness about the social dimension of sustainability such as equity, unconscious biases, microaggressions, stereotypes, prejudices, and cultural humility.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (i.e., surveys, data, and/or models).

References

Agarwal, H., and P. S. Vaghela. 2018. “Work values of gen Z: Bridging the gap to the next generation.” In Proc., 2018—National Conf. on Innovative Business Management Practices in 21st Century, 1–26. Gujarat, India: Parul Univ.
Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, edited by P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Atanda, J. O., and A. Öztürk. 2020. “Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 22 (1): 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0184-1.
Basford, T. E., L. R. Offermann, and T. S. Behrend. 2014. “Do you see what I see? Perceptions of gender microaggressions in the workplace.” Psychol. Women Q. 38 (3): 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313511420.
Bellomo, T. 2019. “What safety can teach us about unconscious bias.” Prof. Saf. 64 (5): 70.
Boyce, A. S. 2017. “Lessons learned using a values-engaged approach to attend to culture, diversity, and equity in a STEM program evaluation.” Eval. Program Plann. 64 (Oct): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.018.
Brent, A., and C. Labuschagne. 2006. “Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.01.233.
Capon, N., and D. Kuhn. 2004. “What’s so good about problem-based learning?” Cognit. Instruction 22 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_3.
Chang, C.-C., G.-J. Hwang, and Y.-F. Tu. 2022. “Roles, applications, and trends of concept map-supported learning: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of publications from 1992 to 2020 in selected educational technology journals.” Interact. Learn. Environ. 47: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2027457.
Choi, J. O., P. P. Shrestha, J. Lim, and B. K. Shrestha. 2018. “An investigation of construction workforce inequalities and biases in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 148–157. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ElZomor, M., C. Mann, K. Doten-Snitker, K. Parrish, and M. Chester. 2018. “Leveraging vertically integrated courses and problem-based learning to improve students’ performance and skills.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 144 (4): 04018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000379.
Feng, X., and L. Behar-Horenstein. 2019. “Maximizing NVivo utilities to analyze open-ended responses.” Qual. Rep. 24 (3): 563–572. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3692.
Fiarman, S. E. 2016. “Unconscious bias: When good intentions aren’t enough.” Educ. Leadersh. 74 (3): 10–15.
Finelli, C. J., M. A. Holsapple, E. Ra, R. M. Bielby, B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, and J. A. Sutkus. 2012. “An assessment of engineering students’ curricular and co-curricular experiences and their ethical development.” J. Eng. Educ. 101 (3): 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00058.x.
Finucane, M. L., J. Acosta, A. Wicker, and K. Whipkey. 2020. “Short-term solutions to a long-term challenge: Rethinking disaster recovery planning to reduce vulnerabilities and inequities.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (2): 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020482.
Forcael, E., V. González, F. Orozco, A. Opazo, Á. Suazo, and P. Aránguiz. 2015. “Application of problem-based learning to teaching the critical path method.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 141 (3): 04014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000236.
Furtado, P. G. F., T. Hirashima, and Y. Hayashi. 2019. “Reducing cognitive load during closed concept map construction and consequences on reading comprehension and retention.” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12 (3): 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2861744.
Gorski, P. 2016. “Rethinking the role of ‘culture’ in educational equity: From cultural competence to equity literacy.” Multicultural Perspect. 18 (4): 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1228344.
Harris, T., and J. W. Hardin. 2013. “Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank and Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney ranksum tests.” Stata J. 13 (2): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1301300208.
He, L., L. Murphy, and J. Luo. 2016. “Using social media to promote STEM education: Matching college students with role models.” In Proc., Joint European Conf. on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 79–95. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Hossain, M. U., C. S. Poon, Y. H. Dong, I. M. C. Lo, and J. C. P. Cheng. 2018. “Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23 (8): 1654–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0.
Hu, M., T. Shealy, J. Grohs, and R. Panneton. 2019. “Empirical evidence that concept mapping reduces neurocognitive effort during concept generation for sustainability.” J. Cleaner Prod. 238 (Nov): 117815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117815.
Jensen, J. O., M. S. Jørgensen, M. Elle, and E. H. Lauridsen. 2012. “Has social sustainability left the building? The recent conceptualization of ‘sustainability’ in Danish buildings.” Sustainability 8 (1): 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908088.
Karji, A., A. Woldesenbet, M. Khanzadi, and M. Tafazzoli. 2019. “Assessment of social sustainability indicators in mass housing construction: A case study of Mehr housing project.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 50 (Oct): 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101697.
Kaur, A., and V. Gupta. 2013. “A survey on sentiment analysis and opinion mining techniques.” J. Emerging Technol. Web Intell. 5 (4): 367–371. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.5.4.367-371.
Leung, C.-H., C. W. R. Ng, and P. O. E. Chan. 2011. “Can co-curricular activities enhance the learning effectiveness of students? An application to the sub-degree students in Hong Kong.” Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ. 23 (3): 329–341.
Marcelin, J. R., D. S. Siraj, R. Victor, S. Kotadia, and Y. A. Maldonado. 2019. “The impact of unconscious bias in healthcare: How to recognize and mitigate it.” Supplement, J. Infect. Dis. 220 (S2): S62–S73. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz214.
Marshall, A., et al. 2021. “Responding and navigating racialized microaggressions in STEM.” Pathog. Dis. 79 (5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftab027.
Meerow, S., P. Pajouhesh, and T. R. Miller. 2019. “Social equity in urban resilience planning.” Local Environ. 24 (9): 793–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103.
Nagy, Z., D. G. Cogan, and D. Sinnreich. 2013. “Optimizing environmental, social and governance factors in portfolio construction: Analysis of three ESG-tilted strategies.SSRN Electronic Journal, February 21, 2013.
Olakitan Atanda, J. 2019. “Developing a social sustainability assessment framework.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 44 (Jan): 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.023.
Petrovic-Lazarevic, S. 2008. “The development of corporate social responsibility in the Australian construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 26 (2): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701819079.
Postman, N., and C. Weingartner. 1969. Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Dell Publishing.
Pradhananga, P., M. ElZomor, and G. Kasabdji. 2022. “Advancing minority STEM students’ communication and presentation skills through cocurricular training activities.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (2): 04022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000060.
Pradhananga, P., M. ElZomor, A. M. Sadri, and N. Pradhananga. 2020a. “Integrating social media platforms in construction education to increase student engagement.” EPiC Ser. Built Environ. 1 (Sep): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.29007/t4xb.
Pradhananga, P., M. ElZomor, G. Santi, and A. M. Sadri. 2020b. “Integrative pedagogical framework to support construction students’ professional skills and engagement.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Pruett, J. L., and E. G. Weigel. 2020. “Concept map assessment reveals short-term community-engaged fieldwork enhances sustainability knowledge.” CBE Life Sci. Educ. 19 (3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-02-0031.
Rico-García, M., and L. V. Fielden Burns. 2020. “Intercultural communication in engineering studies: A key competence in global labour markets.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 45 (6): 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1654980.
Schwertman, N. C., M. A. Owens, and R. Adnan. 2004. “A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 47 (1): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2003.10.012.
Shepherd, A., and B. Cosgrif. 1998. “Problem-based learning: A bridge between planning education and planning practice.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 17 (4): 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9801700409.
Sheppard, S. D., S. R. Brunhaver, and R. F. Korte. 2018. Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Snowball, J., and M. Mostert. 2010. “Introducing a learning management system in a large first year class: The impact on lecturers and students.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on e-Learning, ICEL, 441–448. Reading, UK: Academic Conferences Limited.
Stender, M., and A. Walter. 2019. “The role of social sustainability in building assessment.” Build. Res. Inf. 47 (5): 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1468057.
Tomkinson, B., R. Tomkinson, H. Dobson, and C. Engel. 2008. “Education for sustainable development—An inter-disciplinary pilot module for undergraduate engineers and scientists.” Int. J. Sustainable Eng. 1 (1): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802188100.
Trytten, D. A., A. W. Lowe, and S. E. Walden. 2012. “‘Asians are good at math. What an awful stereotype’: The Model Minority Stereotype’s impact on Asian American engineering students.” J. Eng. Educ. 101 (3): 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00057.x.
US BLS (US Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2020. Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: US BLS.
Utami, A. D., and E. Yuliyanto. 2020. “Concept map: Does it increase learning motivation of student?” J. Sci. Educ. Res. 4 (2): 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v4i2.35714.
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and L. Klotz. 2011. “Incorporating the social dimension of sustainability into civil engineering education.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 137 (4): 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000066.
Valentin, V., and S. M. Bogus. 2015. “Assessing the link between public opinion and social sustainability in building and infrastructure projects.” J. Green Build. 10 (3): 177–190. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.10.3.177.
Wang, Y. 2009. “Sustainability in construction education.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 135 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(21).
Wang, Z., O. Adesope, N. K. Sundararajan, and P. Buckley. 2021. “Effects of different concept map activities on chemistry learning.” Educ. Psychol. 41 (2): 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1749567.
Wu, P. H., G. J. Hwang, M. Milrad, H. R. Ke, and Y. M. Huang. 2012. “An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43 (2): 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x.
Zuo, J., X. H. Jin, and L. Flynn. 2012. “Social sustainability in construction—An explorative study.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 12 (2): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2012.10773190.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 149Issue 2April 2023

History

Received: Mar 5, 2022
Accepted: Jun 19, 2022
Published online: Nov 16, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL 33174. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-6001. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International Univ., 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-9601. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Multi-Project Evaluation of Engineering Students’ Performance for Online PBL: Taking the Sustainable Decision Analysis Course as an Example, Sustainability, 10.3390/su16041389, 16, 4, (1389), (2024).
  • URBAN–RURAL DIFFERENCES IN PRIMARY SCHOOL RESOURCES IN CHINA: A CASE STUDY OF YUNCHENG COUNTY, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 10.3846/ijspm.2023.19142, 27, 2, (120-132), (2023).
  • Promoting Social Sustainability for Minority Populations through Understanding their Challenges in Professional Engineering Certification, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 10.18260/1-2--43985, (2023).
  • Improving Students’ Communication Skills and Systems Thinking Ability in Circular Economy through Combination Learning Module, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 10.18260/1-2--43590, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share