Technical Papers
Apr 6, 2022

Assessing the Value of a Regional Climate Model’s Rainfall Forecasts in Improving Dry-Season Streamflow Predictions

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 6

Abstract

Rainfall is a critical input variable of statistical streamflow forecasting models at subseasonal to seasonal time scales. This study presents a framework for evaluating the utility of a high-resolution experimental winter seasonal climate reforecasts for Florida (CLIFF) in improving streamflow forecasts. The CLIFF forecasts were coproduced through a scientist–stakeholder group of the Florida Water and Climate Alliance. The framework consists of a statistical streamflow generation model, four different sets of rainfall inputs, and distinct metrics for evaluating the resulting streamflow forecasts. The four sets of rainfall inputs include rainfall climatology, observed rainfall, NOAA-based seasonal rainfall forecasts, and CLIFF-based rainfall forecasts. Because NOAA ensemble precipitation forecasts were not available in this study, NOAA-based categorical precipitation outlooks were postprocessed via a hidden Markov chain model to obtain the corresponding NOAA-based seasonal rainfall forecasts. Streamflow forecasts based on rainfall climatology served as a reference. Different evaluation metrics, including Spearman correlation, mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and rank probability skill score (RPSS), were employed to evaluate model performance. The framework was demonstrated for streamflow forecasts for two rivers in the southwest of Florida, serving as a major source of a regional water supply agency. A retrospective streamflow forecasting model was designed for the dry season [November, December, January, and February (NDJF) months] for each of the 20 years from 2000 to 2019. Results revealed that CLIFF-based streamflow forecasts are a promising alternative to NOAA-based forecasts. Deterministic streamflow forecasts based on CLIFF rainfall have a smaller mean absolute percent error (MAPE) compared with the NOAA-based streamflow forecasts. Although NOAA-based probabilistic streamflow forecasts outperformed CLIFF-based probabilistic streamflow forecasts for the winter forecasting periods of November, December, and January, the latter forecasts performed better for the forecasting period of February. Thus, the two probabilistic forecasts are complementary. Although the results are limited to the study area, it has general application for evaluating the utility of different rainfall forecasts in providing deterministic/probabilistic streamflow forecasts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (including the rainfall output from the CLIFF model and code for simulating streamflow).

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Grant NNX17AG72G from NASA. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the funding agency. The authors thank the editor, anonymous associate editor, and reviewers for the constructive comments that improved the manuscript.

References

Alemu, E. T., R. N. Palmer, A. Polebitski, and B. Meaker. 2011. “Decision support system for optimizing reservoir operations using ensemble streamflow predictions.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 137 (1): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000088.
Asefa, T., J. Clayton, A. Adams, and D. Anderson. 2014. “Performance evaluation of a water resources system under varying climatic conditions: Reliability, resilience, vulnerability and beyond.” J. Hydrol. 508 (Jan): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.043.
Ashbolt, S. C., and B. J. C. Perera. 2018. “Multiobjective optimization of seasonal operating rules for water grids using streamflow forecast information.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (4): 05018003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000902.
Bhardwaj, A., V. Misra, B. Kirtman, T. Asefa, C. Maran, K. Morris, E. Carter, C. Martinez, and D. Roberts. 2021. “Experimental high-resolution winter seasonal climate reforecasts for Florida.” Weather Forecasting 36 (4): 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0004.1.
Block, P. 2011. “Tailoring seasonal climate forecasts for hydropower operations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (4): 1355–1368. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1355-2011.
Block, P. J., F. A. Souza Filho, L. Sun, and H.-H. Kwon. 2009. “A streamflow forecasting framework using multiple climate and hydrological models.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 45 (4): 828–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00327.x.
Chen, L., V. P. Singh, W. Lu, J. Zhang, J. Zhou, and S. Guo. 2016. “Streamflow forecast uncertainty evolution and its effect on real-time reservoir operation.” J. Hydrol. 540 (Sep): 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.015.
Chiew, F. H. S., S. L. Zhou, and T. A. McMahon. 2003. “Use of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water resources management.” J. Hydrol. 270 (1–2): 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00292-5.
Cuo, L., T. C. Pagano, and Q. J. Wang. 2011. “A review of quantitative precipitation forecasts and their use in short- to medium-range streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol. 12 (5): 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1347.1.
Demargne, J., et al. 2014. “The science of NOAA’s operational hydrologic ensemble forecast service.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95 (1): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00081.1.
Devineni, N., A. Sankarasubramanian, and S. Ghosh. 2008. “Multimodel ensembles of streamflow forecasts: Role of predictor state in developing optimal combinations.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (9): W09404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005855.
Florida Water and Climate Alliance. 2021. “Uncertainties and risks associated with climate change, climate variability, and sea level rise pose complex challenges to Florida’s water sector.” Accessed October 1, 2021. http://www.floridawca.org/.
Golembesky, K., A. Sankarasubramanian, and N. Devineni. 2009. “Improved drought management of falls lake reservoir: Role of multimodel streamflow forecasts in setting up restrictions.” J. Water Res. Plann. Manage. 135 (3): 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:3(188).
Gong, G., L. Wang, L. Condon, A. Shearman, and U. Lall. 2010. “A simple framework for incorporating seasonal streamflow forecasts into existing water resource management practices.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46 (3): 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00435.x.
Harpold, A. A., K. Sutcliffe, J. Clayton, A. Goodbody, and S. Vazquez. 2017. “Does including soil moisture observations improve operational streamflow forecasts in snow-dominated watersheds?” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 53 (1): 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12490.
Juang, H.-M., and M. Kanamitsu. 1994. “The NMC nested regional spectral model.” Mon. Weather Rev. 122 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122%3C0003:TNNRSM%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kanamitsu, M., et al. 2002. “NCEP Dynamical Seasonal Forecast System 2000.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83 (7): 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083%3C1019:NDSFS%3E2.3.CO;2.
Kirtman, B. P., et al. 2014. “The North American multimodel ensemble: Phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual prediction; Phase-2 toward developing intraseasonal prediction.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95 (4): 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00050.1.
Landman, W. A., S. J. Mason, P. D. Tyson, and W. J. Tennant. 2001. “Statistical downscaling of GCM simulations to streamflow.” J. Hydrol. 252 (1–2): 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00457-7.
Lopez, A., and S. Haines. 2017. “Exploring the usability of probabilistic weather forecasts for water resources decision-making in the United Kingdom.” Weather Clim. Soc. 9 (4): 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0072.1.
Lu, M., U. Lall, A. W. Robertson, and E. Cook. 2017. “Optimizing multiple reliable forward contracts for reservoir allocation using multitime scale streamflow forecasts.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (3): 2035–2050. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019552.
Maidment, D. R. 2016. “Open water data in space and time.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 52 (4): 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12436.
Misra, V., T. Irani, L. Staal, K. Morris, T. Asefa, C. Martinez, and W. Graham. 2021. “The Florida water and climate alliance (FloridaWCA): Developing a stakeholder–scientist partnership to create actionable science in climate adaptation and water resource management.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 102 (2): E367–E382. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0302.1.
Misra, V., H. Li, Z. Wu, and S. DiNapoli. 2014. “Global seasonal climate predictability in a two tiered forecast system. Part I: Boreal summer and fall seasons.” Clim. Dyn. 42 (5): 1425–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1812-y.
Misra, V., A. Mishra, and A. Bhardwaj. 2019. “A coupled ocean-atmosphere downscaled climate projection for the peninsular Florida region.” J. Mar. Syst. 194 (Jun): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.02.010.
Monthly and Seasonal Forecast Archive. 2021. “CPC monthly and seasonal forecast archive.” Accessed October 1, 2021. https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/archives/long_lead/llarc.ind.php.
Oubeidillah, A., G. Tootle, and T. Piechota. 2019. “Incorporating antecedent soil moisture into streamflow forecasting.” Hydrology 6 (2): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology6020050.
Pagano, T. C., et al. 2014. “Challenges of operational river forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol. 15 (4): 1692–1707. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0188.1.
Schepen, A., and Q. J. Wang. 2015. “Model averaging methods to merge operational statistical and dynamic seasonal streamflow forecasts in Australia.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (3): 1797–1812. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016163.
Siddique, R., and A. Mejia. 2017. “Ensemble streamflow forecasting across the US Mid-Atlantic region with a distributed hydrological model forced by GEFS reforecasts.” J. Hydrometeorol. 18 (7): 1905–1928. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0243.1.
Sikder, S., X. Chen, F. Hossain, J. B. Roberts, F. Robertson, C. K. Shum, and F. J. Turk. 2016. “Are general circulation models ready for operational streamflow forecasting for water management in the Ganges and Brahmaputra River Basins?” J. Hydrometeorol. 17 (1): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0099.1.
Sinha, T., and A. Sankarasubramanian. 2013. “Role of climate forecasts and initial conditions in developing streamflow and soil moisture forecasts in a rainfall–runoff regime.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (2): 721–733. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-721-2013.
Steinschneider, S., and C. Brown. 2012. “Dynamic reservoir management with real-option risk hedging as a robust adaptation to nonstationary climate.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (5): W05524. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011540.
Turner, S. W. D., J. C. Bennett, D. E. Robertson, and S. Galelli. 2017. “Complex relationship between seasonal streamflow forecast skill and value in reservoir operations.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (9): 4841–4859. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4841-2017.
Vitart, F., et al. 2017. “The subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project database.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98 (1): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0017.1.
Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, B. Nualláin, and W. Bouten. 2006. “Real-time data assimilation for operational ensemble streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol. 7 (3): 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM504.1.
Wang, H., T. Asefa, D. Bracciano, A. Adams, and N. Wanakule. 2019. “Proactive water shortage mitigation integrating system optimization and input uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. 571 (Apr): 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.071.
Wang, H., T. Asefa, N. Wanakule, and A. Adams. 2020. “Application of decision-support tools for seasonal water supply management that incorporates system uncertainties and operational constraints.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (6): 05020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001225.
Wang, H., E. D. Brill, R. S. Ranjithan, and A. Sankarasubramanian. 2015. “A framework for incorporating ecological releases in single reservoir operation.” Adv. Water Resour. 78 (Apr): 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.006.
Wang, H., and J. Liu. 2013. “Reservoir operation incorporating hedging rules and operational inflow forecasts.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (5): 1427–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0246-3.
Wang, H., A. Sankarasubramanian, and R. S. Ranjithan. 2013. “Integration of climate and weather information for improving 15-day-ahead accumulated precipitation forecasts.” J. Hydrometeorol. 14 (1): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0128.1.
Wilks, D. S. 1995. Vol. 59 of Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: An introduction. San Diego: Academic.
Wilks, D. S. 2006. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
Yuan, X., and E. F. Wood. 2012. “Downscaling precipitation or bias-correcting streamflow? Some implications for coupled general circulation model (CGCM)-based ensemble seasonal hydrologic forecast.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (12): W12519. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012256.
Zhao, T., X. Cai, and D. Yang. 2011. “Effect of streamflow forecast uncertainty on real-time reservoir operation.” Adv. Water Resour. 34 (4): 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.004.
Zhao, T., D. Yang, X. Cai, J. Zhao, and H. Wang. 2012. “Identifying effective forecast horizon for real-time reservoir operation under a limited inflow forecast.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (1): W01540. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010623.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Nov 2, 2021
Accepted: Mar 4, 2022
Published online: Apr 6, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hui Wang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Principal Water Resources System Engineer, Dept. of System Decision Support, Tampa Bay Water, 2575 Enterprise Rd., Clearwater, FL 33763 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tirusew Asefa, F.ASCE [email protected]
Manager, Dept. of System Decision Support, Tampa Bay Water, Clearwater, FL 33763; Courtesy Professor, Patel College of Global Sustainability, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620. Email: [email protected]
Vasubandhu Misra [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306; Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306; Florida Climate Institute, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306. Email: [email protected]
Amit Bhardwaj [email protected]
Researcher, Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306; Florida Climate Institute, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL 32306; Numerical Weather Prediction, India Meteorological Department, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi 110003, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Hydroclimatic Forecast System to Support Decision-Making and Improve Water Security in an Agricultural Frontier of the Brazilian Cerrado, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6261, 150, 3, (2024).
  • Application of Multiobjective Optimization to Provide Operational Guidance for Allocating Supply among Multiple Sources, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5827, 149, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share