Technical Papers
Apr 7, 2022

Adaptive Short-Term Flood Defense Deployment Planning

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 6

Abstract

Temporary flood defenses constitute a supplementary approach to permanent engineering solutions for flood management. However, their deployment strategy is a challenge because it depends on uncertain short-term weather conditions. The strategies that later proved to be insufficient or underused can have high social and environmental costs. Real options analysis (ROA) provides a mechanism to include flexibility in decision making to adapt the deployment strategies to future conditions and handle the aforementioned challenge in temporary flood defenses planning. To apply ROA principles, we combined multistage stochastic programming and a scenario tree. The methodology provided adaptive and flexible deployment decisions as uncertain future weather conditions were resolved. The proposed formulation was applied to nine flood-affected locations in Carlisle, northwest England, and the implications of the results were investigated. The results showed that there is a value achieved by building ROA in design of temporary defense deployment planning under uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank UK’s Environment Agency and Dr. Susan Manson for her comments and advice on using data.

References

Abhas, K., R. Bloch, and J. Lamond. 2008. A guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ashley, S. T., and W. S. Ashley. 2008. “Flood fatalities in the United States.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 47 (3): 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1.
Basupi, I., and Z. Kapelan. 2015. “Flexible water distribution system design under future demand uncertainty.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (4): 04014067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000416.
Bhat, M. S., A. Alam, B. Ahmad, B. S. Kotlia, H. Farooq, A. K. Taloor, and S. Ahmad. 2019. “Flood frequency analysis of River Jhelum in Kashmir Basin.” Quat. Int. 507 (Feb): 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.039.
Bloemen, P., T. Reeder, C. Zevenbergen, J. Rijke, and A. Kingsborough. 2018. “Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management and challenges for the further development of this approach.” Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change 23 (7): 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9773-9.
Brandão, L. E., J. S. Dyer, and W. J. Hahn. 2005. “Using binomial decision trees to solve real-option valuation problems.” Decis. Anal. 2 (2): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0040.
Cartwright, A., A. Tsavdaris, R. Burton, and D. Matthews. 2018. “Delivering temporary flood defense deployment plans: Lessons learned from case studies in the UK.” In Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 345–353. London: Thomas Telford.
Ceseña, E. A. M., T. Capuder, and P. Mancarella. 2016. “Flexible distributed multienergy generation system expansion planning under uncertainty.” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7 (1): 348–357.
Chorn, L., and S. Shokhor. 2006. “Real options for risk management in petroleum development investments.” Energy Econ. 28 (4): 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.03.002.
Chow, J. Y., and A. C. Regan. 2011. “Network-based real option models.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 45 (4): 682–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.11.005.
Czitrom, V. 1999. “One-factor-at-a-time versus designed experiments.” Am. Stat. 53 (2): 126–131.
de Bruin, K. 2011. An economic analysis of adaptation to climate change under uncertainty. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Univ.
De Neufville, R., and S. Scholtes. 2011. Flexibility in engineering design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
De Weck, O. L., R. D. Neufville, and M. Chaize. 2004. “Staged deployment of communications satellite constellations in low Earth orbit.” J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 1 (3): 119–136. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6346.
Dixit, A. K., and R. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dupacová, J., N. Gröwe-Kuska, and W. Römisch. 2000. Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: An approach using probability metrics. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
EA (Environment Agency). 2016. Supporting communities remaining at risk (SCRR). Bristol, UK: EA.
EA (Environment Agency). 2018. Long term investment scenarios: Additional analysis topic 6 technical report temporary community defenses. Bristol, UK: EA.
England, J. F., T. A. Cohn, and B. A. Faber. 2019. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency—Bulletin 17c. Washington, DC: USGS.
Erfani, T., K. Pachos, and J. Harou. 2018. “Real-options water supply planning: Multistage scenario trees for adaptive and flexible capacity expansion under probabilistic climate change uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (7): 5069–5087. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021803.
Erfani, T., K. Pachos, and J. J. Harou. 2020. “Decision-dependent uncertainty in adaptive real-options water resource planning.” Adv. Water Resour. 136 (Feb): 103490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103490.
Escudero, L. F., A. Garín, M. Merino, and G. Pérez. 2007. “The value of the stochastic solution in multistage problems.” Top 15 (1): 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-007-0005-4.
Farooq, M., M. Shafique, and M. S. Khattak. 2018. “Flood frequency analysis of river swat using log Pearson type 3, generalized extreme value, normal, and gumbel max distribution methods.” Arabian J. Geosci. 11 (9): 216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3553-z.
Fewtrell, T. J., J. C. Neal, P. D. Bates, and P. J. Harrison. 2011. “Geometric and structural river channel complexity and the prediction of urban inundation.” Hydrol. Processes 25 (20): 3173–3186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8035.
Feyen, L., R. Dankers, K. Bódis, P. Salamon, and J. I. Barredo. 2012. “Fluvial flood risk in europe in present and future climates.” Clim. Change 112 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0339-7.
Fola Ogunyoye. 2011. Temporary and demountable flood protection guide. Bristol, UK: Evironment Agency.
Fricke, E., and A. P. Schulz. 2005. “Design for changeability (DFC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle.” Syst. Eng. 8 (4): 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20039.
Government of United Kingdom 2016. “National flood resilience review.” Environ. Agency 25 (1): 76–88.
Green, C. 2003. Handbook of water economics: Principles and practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Griffis, V., and J. Stedinger. 2007. “Log-Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in flood frequency analysis. I: Distribution characteristics.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 12 (5): 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:5(482).
Growe-Kuska, N., H. Heitsch, and W. Romisch. 2003. “Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems.” In Proc., Power Tech Conf. New York: IEEE.
Haasnoot, M., J. H. Kwakkel, W. E. Walker, and J. ter Maat. 2013. “Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world.” Global Environ. Change 23 (2): 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006.
Hall, J. W., I. C. Meadowcroft, P. B. Sayers, and M. E. Bramley. 2003. “Integrated flood risk management in England and Wales.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 4 (3): 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(126).
Heitsch, H., and W. Römisch. 2003. “Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming.” Comput. Optim. Appl. 24 (2–3): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021805924152.
Hino, M., and J. W. Hall. 2017. “Real options analysis of adaptation to changing flood risk: Structural and nonstructural measures.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): 04017005. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000905.
HMA (Housing Market Areas). 2011. Carlisle city council housing need and demand study. London: HM Government.
Housh, M., A. Ostfeld, and U. Shamir. 2013. “Limited multi-stage stochastic programming for managing water supply systems.” Environ. Modell. Software 41 (Mar): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.006.
Kapelan, R. B. H. 2018. Accounting for adaptive capacity in FCERM options appraisal. Washington, DC: Environment Agency.
Kapelan, Z. S., D. A. Savic, and G. A. Walters. 2005. “Multiobjective design of water distribution systems under uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (Nov): 11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003787.
Kind, J. M., J. H. Baayen, and W. W. Botzen. 2018. “Benefits and limitations of real options analysis for the practice of river flood risk management.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (4): 3018–3036. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022402.
Kreibich, H., K. Piroth, I. Seifert, H. Maiwald, U. Kunert, J. Schwarz, B. Merz, and A. Thieken. 2009. “Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling?” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9 (5): 1679–1692. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009.
Krzysztofowicz, R., and D. R. Davis. 1983. “Category-unit loss functions for flood forecast-response system evaluation.” Water Resour. Res. 19 (6): 1476–1480. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i006p01476.
Kwadijk, J. C., et al. 2010. “Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: A case study in the Netherlands.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1 (5): 729–740.
Kwakkel, J. H., M. Haasnoot, and W. E. Walker. 2016. “Comparing robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive policy pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty.” Environ. Modell. Software 86 (Dec): 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017.
Lander, D. M., and G. E. Pinches. 1998. “Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options.” Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 38 (3): 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80089-1.
Lazo, J. G. L., M. A. C. Pacheco, M. Vellasco, and M. A. Dias. 2003. “Real option decision rules for oil field development under market uncertainty using genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation.” In Proc., 7th Annual Real Options Conf. Porto, Portugal: Seventh Annual Real Options Conference.
Lempert, R. J., D. G. Groves, S. W. Popper, and S. C. Bankes. 2006. “A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios.” Manage. Sci. 52 (4): 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472.
Linquiti, P., and N. Vonortas. 2012. “The value of flexibility in adapting to climate change: A real options analysis of investments in coastal defense.” Clim. Change Econ. 3 (2): 1250008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S201000781250008X.
Maestu, J., and C. Gómez. 2012. Valuing water. New York: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Merz, B., J. Hall, M. Disse, and A. Schumann. 2010a. “Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (3): 509–527. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010.
Merz, B., H. Kreibich, R. Schwarze, and A. Thieken. 2010b. “Review article assessment of economic flood damage.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (8): 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010.
Merz, B., H. Kreibich, A. Thieken, and R. Schmidtke. 2004. “Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 4 (1): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004.
Messner, F., and V. Meyer. 2006. “Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception—Challenges for flood damage research.” In Flood risk management: Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures, 149–167. Berlin: Springer.
National Research Council. 2000. Risk analysis and uncertainty in flood damage reduction studies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Parkes, B., and D. Demeritt. 2016. “Defining the hundred year flood: A Bayesian approach for using historic data to reduce uncertainty in flood frequency estimates.” J. Hydrol. 540 (Sep): 1189–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.025.
Penning-Rowsell, E., P. Floyd, D. Ramsbottom, and S. Surendran. 2005. “Estimating injury and loss of life in floods: A deterministic framework.” Nat. Hazards 36 (1–2): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-4538-7.
Penning-Rowsell, E., S. Priest, D. Parker, J. Morris, S. Tunstall, C. Viavattene, J. Chatterton, and D. Owen. 2019. Flood and coastal erosion risk management: Handbook and data for economic appraisal 2019. England, UK: Routledge.
Pilling, C., V. Dodds, M. Cranston, D. Price, T. Harrison, and A. How. 2016. “Flood forecasting–a national overview for great Britain.” In Flood forecasting, 201–247. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Pitt, M. 2008. The Pitt review: Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. London: Cabinet Office.
Savic, D. A. 2005. Coping with risk and uncertainty in urban water infrastructure rehabilitation planning. London: Citeseer.
Scawthorn, C., et al. 2006. “HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 7 (2): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(72).
Seifert, I., H. Kreibich, B. Merz, and A. Thieken. 2009. “Estimation of flood losses due to business interruption.” In Flood risk management: Research and practice, 1669–1676. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Smith, J. E., and K. F. McCardle. 1998. “Valuing oil properties: Integrating option pricing and decision analysis approaches.” Oper. Res. 46 (2): 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.46.2.198.
Thieken, A. H., M. Müller, H. Kreibich, and B. Merz. 2005. “Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the august 2002 flood in Germany.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (Dec): 12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004177.
Topal, E. 2008. “Evaluation of a mining project using discounted cash flow analysis, decision tree analysis, monte carlo simulation and real options using an example.” Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng. 1 (1): 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMME.2008.020457.
Wind, H., T. Nierop, C. De Blois, and J. L. de Kok. 1999. “Analysis of flood damages from the 1993 and 1995 Meuse floods.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (11): 3459–3465. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900192.
Woodward, M., Z. Kapelan, and B. Gouldby. 2014. “Adaptive flood risk management under climate change uncertainty using real options and optimization.” Risk Anal. 34 (1): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12088.
Zhang, S., V. Babovic, and J. Buurman. 2009. “Design of a maritime security system under uncertainty using an evolutionary real options framework.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Ecohydraulics and 8th Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics. Concepción, CL: Real Options Conference Paper.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: May 7, 2021
Accepted: Jan 10, 2022
Published online: Apr 7, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Geomatic Engineering, Univ. College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Email: [email protected]
Tohid Erfani [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Geomatic Engineering, Univ. College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share