Technical Papers
Feb 21, 2022

Knowledge Polycentricity of China’s Urban Agglomerations

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

In the era of the knowledge economy, the polycentricism and polycentricity of urban regions holds important implications for knowledge production, collaboration, and innovation. Using data from Chinese and English journal repositories on urban paper publications and intercity paper collaborations, this paper measures morphological and functional knowledge polycentricities in 19 urban agglomerations in China in 2014–2016. We find that, first, the morphological polycentricity of urban agglomeration is on the whole higher than the functional polycentricity of agglomerations, but that no obvious correlation exists between these two types of polycentricities. Most agglomerations, further, are found to be characterized by high morphological and low functional polycentricities, while the dual low morphological and functional polycentric types are rarely seen, indicating that homogeneous knowledge production characteristics are not necessarily accompanied by high levels of knowledge cooperation. Second, urban agglomerations that are both highly morphologically and functionally polycentric (such as most urban agglomerations along China’s eastern coast) tend to be characterized by a higher overall level of knowledge innovation. The development of functional polycentricity is, therefore, closely related to the knowledge stock and innovation foundations of an urban agglomeration. Third, the typological basis for the development of functional knowledge polycentricity is predominantly the level of economic development of a given agglomeration, which also steers the potential impact of (synergistic) innovation policies on knowledge polycentricity. The study argues that, while it is difficult to establish a relationship between morphological knowledge polycentric and the level of innovation in urban agglomerations, functional polycentricity is an important condition for urban agglomerations to function as innovation incubators.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41971209) and the National Social Science Fund (Grant No. 21ZDA011).

References

Anas, A., R. Arnott, and K. A. Small. 1998. “Urban spatial structure.” J. Econ. Lit. 36: 1426–1464.
Andersson, D. E., S. Gunessee, C. W. Matthiessen, and S. Find. 2014. “The geography of Chinese science.” Environ. Plann. a-Econ Space 46 (12): 2950–2971. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130283p.
Burger, M. J., B. De Goei, L. Van Der Laan, and F. J. M. Huisman. 2011. “Heterogeneous development of metropolitan spatial structure: Evidence from commuting patterns in English and Welsh city-regions, 1981–2001.” Cities 28: 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.11.006.
Burger, M., and E. Meijers. 2012. “Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity.” Urban Stud. 49 (5): 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095.
Burger, M. J., B. Van Der Knaap, and R. S. Wall. 2014. “Polycentricity and the multiplexity of urban networks.” Eur. Plann. Stud. 22 (4): 816–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.771619.
Champion, T. 2001. “Migration and restructuring in the United States: A geographic perspective.” Popul. Stud. J. Demogr. 55 (2): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720127684.
Chen, G. D., C. Y. Wang, and K. L. Ou. 2003. “Using group communication to monitor web-based group learning.” J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 19 (4): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00045.x.
Davoudi, S. 2003. “Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda.” Eur. Plann. Stud. 11 (8): 979–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431032000146169.
Fang, C. L. 2020. Atlas of China urban agglomeration. Beijing: Science Press.
Fang, C. L., and D. L. Yu. 2019. China’s urban agglomerations. Beijing: Science Press.
Gottmann, J. 1957. “Megalopolis or the urbanization of the northeastern seaboard.” Econ. Geogr. 33 (3): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/142307.
Gottmann, J. 1964. Megalopolis: The urbanized Northeastern seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gottmann, J. 1976. “Megalopolitan systems around the world.” Ekistics 243: 109–113.
Green, N. 2007. “Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis.” Urban Stud. 44 (11): 2077–2103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701518941.
Gui, Q. C, Liu, C. L., and D. B. Du. 2018. “Does network position foster knowledge production? Evidence from international scientific collaboration network.” Growth Change 49 (4): 594–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12263.
Hall, P. 2009. “Polycentricity.” In International encyclopedia of human geography, edited by R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 260–264. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Hall, P., and K. Pain. 2010. The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
Hassink, R. 2007. “It’s the language, stupid! On emotions, strategies, and consequences related to the use of one language to describe and explain a diverse world—Commentary.” Environ. Plann. A 39 (6): 1282–1287. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39282.
Li, Y., and F. L. Wu. 2012. “The transformation of regional governance in China: The rescaling of statehood.” Prog. Plann. 78 (2): 55–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2012.03.001.
Li, Y. C., and N. Phelps. 2018. “Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014.” Urban Stud. 55 (2): 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016656971.
Li, Y. C., and N. A. Phelps. 2017. “Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis.” Reg. Stud. 51 (7): 1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1240868.
Li, Y. C., and N. A. Phelps. 2019. “Megalopolitan glocalization: The evolving relational economic geography of intercity knowledge linkages within and beyond China's Yangtze River Delta region, 2004–2014.” Urban Geogr. 40 (9): 1310–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1585140.
Liu, X. J., B. Derudder, and K. Wu. 2016. “Measuring polycentric urban development in China: An intercity transportation network perspective.” Reg. Stud. 50 (8): 1302–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1004535.
Ma, H. T., C. L. Fang, S. N. Lin, X. D. Huang, and C. D. Xu. 2018. “Hierarchy, agglomerations, and spatial differences in Chinese inter-city networks constructed by scientific collaborators.” J. Geog. Sci. 28 (3): 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1579-5.
Ma, H. T., C. L. Fang, B. Pang, and G. D. Li. 2014. “The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010.” PLoS One 9 (11): e111705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111705.
Ma, H. T., C. L. Fang, B. Pang, and S. J. Wang. 2015. “Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flows.” Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25 (4): 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0731-0.
Ma, H. T., Y. C. Li, and X. D. Huang. 2020. “Proximity and the evolving knowledge polycentricity of megalopolitan science: Evidence from China’s Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, 1990–2016.” Urban Stud. 58(2):004209802094266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020942665.
Malecki, E. J., and H. Wei. 2009. “A wired world: The evolving geography of submarine cables and the shift to Asia.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 99 (2): 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600802686216.
Mao, H. Y. 2017. “Innovation of mechanism and regional policy for promoting coordinated development of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei.” Prog. Geogr. 36 (1): 2–14. https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.01.001.
Meijers, E. 2007. “From central place to network model: Theory and evidence of a paradigm change.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 98 (2): 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00394.x.
Meijers, E. 2008. “Summing small cities does not make a large city: Polycentric urban regions and the provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities.” Urban Stud. 45 (11): 2323–2342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008095870.
Neal, Z. P. 2011a. “The causal relationship between employment and business networks in US cities.” J. Urban Aff. 33 (2): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00538.x.
Neal, Z. P. 2011b. “From central places to network bases: A transition in the US urban hierarchy, 1900–2000.” City Community 10 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01340.x.
Parr, J. 2005. “Perspectives on the city region.” Reg. Stud.Reg. Sci. 39 (5): 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500151798.
Parr, J. B. 2004. “The polycentric urban region: A closer inspection.” Reg. Stud. 38 (3): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211114.
Peck, J., and J. Zhang. 2013. “A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics?” J. Econ. Geog. 13 (3): 357–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs058.
Scherngell, T., and Y. J. Hu. 2011. “Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach.” Reg. Stud. 45 (6): 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713373.
Shan, J. C., Y. L. Liu, X. S. Kong, Y. F. Liu, and Y. H. Wang. 2020. “Identifying city shrinkage in population and city activity in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (3): 04020027. -. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000593.
Taylor, P. J., B. Derudder, J. Faulconbridge, M. Hoyler, and P. F. Ni. 2014. “Advanced producer service firms as strategic networks, global cities as strategic places.” Econ. Geogr. 90 (3): 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12040.
Taylor, P. J., D. M. Evans, and K. Pain. 2008. “Application of the interlocking network model to mega city regions: Measuring polycentricity within and beyond city regions.” Reg. Stud. 42 (8): 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874214.
Van Oort, F. 2017. Urban growth and innovation: Spatially bounded externalities in the Netherlands. London: Routledge.
Veneri, P. 2010. “Urban polycentricity and the costs of commuting: Evidence from Italian metropolitan areas.” Growth Change 41 (3): 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00531.x.
Wei, Y. H. D. 2015. “Network linkages and local embeddedness of foreign ventures in China: The case of suzhou municipality.” Reg. Stud. 49 (2): 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.770139.
Wei, Y. H. D., C. K. Leung, W. M. Li, and R. Pan. 2008. “Institutions, location, and networks of multinational enterprises in China: A case study of Hangzhou.” Urban Geogr. 29 (7): 639–661. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.29.7.639.
Wheeler, S. 2009. “Regions, megaregions, and sustainability.” Reg. Stud. 43 (6): 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701861344.
Yang, J. W., G. Song, and J. Lin. 2015. “Measuring spatial structure of China’s megaregions. Journal of urban planning and development.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (2): 04014021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000207.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Jun 3, 2021
Accepted: Dec 3, 2021
Published online: Feb 21, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China (corresponding author). ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-050X. Email: [email protected]
Xuanfang Xu [email protected]
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China; Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Structure Identification Method for Urban Agglomeration Based on Nighttime Light Data and Railway Data, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs15010216, 15, 1, (216), (2022).
  • Identification and Evaluation of the Polycentric Urban Structure: An Empirical Analysis Based on Multi-Source Big Data Fusion, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs14112705, 14, 11, (2705), (2022).
  • Towards innovation resilience through urban networks of co-invention: A case study of cities in China, Frontiers in Earth Science, 10.3389/feart.2022.974219, 10, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share