Technical Papers
Jun 24, 2019

A Transdisciplinary Approach for the Validation of Neighborhood Landscape Design Guidelines

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145, Issue 3

Abstract

Although numerous planning and design guidelines have been developed to guide landscape implementation in urban areas, there is scant information on how they are validated before their application. Validation, defined in this study as the process of assessing the applicability and readiness for adoption of guidelines, is seldom reported but is essential if landscapes are to meet the diverse needs of stakeholders. This study focused on the validation of design guidelines for neighborhood landscapes by using a transdisciplinary process to integrate the opinions of the researchers who develop the guidelines, the policy makers who adopt the guidelines as landscape policies, the design practitioners who use the guidelines in design, and the residents who use the neighborhood landscapes once they are implemented. Three design schemes were developed based on the guidelines, and six surveys were conducted to understand the opinions of the four stakeholder groups. The transdisciplinarity of the validation process was assessed using three criteria: credibility, legitimacy, and saliency. The study found that (1) these three criteria can be used to assess the outcomes of the validation process, although each criterion was met to different degrees; (2) the overall assessment of the design schemes produced by following the design guidelines was favorable, but residents and policy makers placed different emphases on the assessment areas; (3) the perceived importance of particular ecosystem services in design schemes, such as heat and flood hazard mitigation, was relatively high, but maintenance of soil quality was less visible and less emphasized; and (4) all groups perceived particular ecosystem services, such as recreation and mosquito control, as highly applicable to neighborhood landscapes, while the importance of noise reduction, soil improvement, and stormwater treatment functions was more variable across the groups. The study yields insights that could be used to validate other guidelines.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was a part of a larger study funded by the Land and Liveability National Innovation Challenge Grant (L2NICCFP1-2013-10) to P.Y. Tan. We would like to thank to anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments. Thanks also go to the other members of the research team: K.H. Liao, V. Chua, and Chan, J.

References

Aitken, R. C. 1969. A growing edge of measurement of feelings [Abridged]: Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bernard, H. R., and H. R. Bernard. 2012. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bradley, J. C., T. M. Waliczek, and J. M. Zajicek. 1999. “Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students.” J. Environ. Educ. 30 (3): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601873.
Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2012. “Knowledge systems for sustainable development.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (14): 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
Cook, E. M., S. J. Hall, and K. L. Larson. 2012. “Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: A synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment.” Urban Ecosyst. 15 (1): 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0.
Creighton, J. L. 2005. The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. New York: Wiley.
Delbecq, A. L., A. H. Van de Ven, and D. H. Gustafson. 1975. Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Deming, M. E., and S. Swaffield. 2011. Landscape architectural research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Department of Statistics. 2017. “Latest data.” Accessed May 31, 2019. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/whats-new/latest-data.
Dzhambov, A. M., and D. D. Dimitrova. 2014. “Urban green spaces’ effectiveness as a psychological buffer for the negative health impact of noise pollution: A systematic review.” Noise Health 16 (70): 157. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.134916.
Holden, M., C. Li, A. Molina, and D. Sturgeon. 2016. “Crafting new urban assemblages and steering neighborhood transition: Actors and roles in ecourban neighborhood development.” Articulo-J. Urban Res. 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3114.
Hsu, C.-C., and B. A. Sandford. 2007. “The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 12 (10): 1–8.
Hwang, Y. H., and C. J. Roscoe. 2017. “Preference for site conservation in relation to on-site biodiversity and perceived site attributes: An on-site survey of unmanaged urban greenery in a tropical city.” Urban For. Urban Greening 28 (Dec): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.011.
Irvin, R. A., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?” Public Administration Rev. 64 (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
Laerhoven, H. V., H. V. D. Zaag-Loonen, and B. H. Derkx. 2004. “A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children’s questionnaires.” Acta Paediatrica 93 (6): 830–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb03026.x.
Lang, D. J., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C. J. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges.” Sustainability Sci. 7 (1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
Likert, R. 1932. “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Arch. Psychol. 22 (140): 1–55.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Meul, M., F. Nevens, and D. Reheul. 2009. “Validating sustainability indicators: Focus on ecological aspects of Flemish dairy farms.” Ecol. Indic. 9 (2): 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.007.
Nassauer, J. I. 2012. “Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design.” Landscape Urban Plann. 106 (3): 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014.
Nassauer, J. I., and P. Opdam. 2008. “Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm.” Landscape Ecol. 23 (6): 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7.
NParks. n.d. “Community in bloom initiatives.” Accessed April 2, 2019. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardening/community-in-bloom-initiative.
Ostman, R. E., and J. L. Parker. 1987. “Impact of education, age, newspapers, and television on environmental knowledge, concerns, and behaviors.” J. Environ. Educ. 19 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.10801954.
Raymond, C. M., B. A. Bryan, D. H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas. 2009. “Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services.” Ecol. Econ. 68 (5): 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006.
Steinitz, C. 2012. A framework for geodesign: Changing geography by design. Redlands, CA: Esri.
Stigler, S. M. 1989. “Francis Galton’s account of the invention of correlation.” Stat. Sci. 4 (2): 73–79.
Tan, P. Y., and C. Y. Jim. 2017. Greening cities: Forms and functions. Edited by P. Y. Tan, and C. Y. Jim. Singapore: Springer.
Tan, P. Y., K. H. Liao, Y. H. Hwang, and V. Chua. 2018. Nature, place, and people: Forging connections through neighbourhood landscape design. Singapore: World Scientific.
Thompson, S. C. G., and M. A. Barton. 1994. “Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment.” J. Environ. Psychol. 14 (2): 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9.
Xiang, W. N. 2017. “Foreword II: Front Matters.” In Greening cities: Forms and functions, edited by P. Y. Tan and C. Y. Jim, ix–xiii. Singapore: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 145Issue 3September 2019

History

Received: Mar 20, 2018
Accepted: Jan 17, 2019
Published online: Jun 24, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 24, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yun Hye Hwang [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Puay Yok Tan [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566. Email: [email protected]
Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo [email protected]
Research Fellow, Dept. of Architecture, School of Design and Environment, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share