Technical Papers
May 30, 2016

Effect of Bicycle Facilities on Travel Mode Choice Decisions

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142, Issue 4

Abstract

Bicycle facilities are commonly invested in to reduce vehicle congestion, mitigate vehicle emissions, and promote physical activity by increasing the number of bicycle trips and reducing the number of vehicle trips. Although there has been a large amount of behavioral and observational research on bicyclists’ route and facility preferences and the traveling public’s mode choice decisions, there is surprisingly little evidence on the effectiveness of bicycle facilities in increasing the share of bicycling relative to vehicle use. Using a stated-preference survey, this study finds that more than two-thirds of current bicycle facility users in Albuquerque, New Mexico, would continue to bicycle, and nearly one-third would discontinue bicycling, if the bicycle facilities they regularly use did not exist. The most common alternative would be driving a car. The findings suggest that bicycle facilities can increase bicycle mode share and reduce driving by influencing the mode choice decisions of certain individuals—namely, those with the least bicycling experience. Bicycle facilities may therefore play an important role in building new bicyclist confidence.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Julie Luna, transportation planner at the Mid Region Council of Governments, for her assistance in developing, administering, and coding the data from the Bike to Work Day survey. The survey effort described in this paper was supported by the Mid Region Council of Governments through an in-kind contribution of staff time and survey supplies. Data analysis was partially supported by an internal grant from the University of New Mexico. No other external financial support was provided for this research project.

References

Akar, G., and Clifton, K. (2009). “Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2140, 165–172.
Broach, J., Dill, J., and Gliebe, J. (2012). “Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data.” Transp. Res. Part A, 46(10), 1730–1740.
Buehler, R., and Pucher, J. (2012). “Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes.” Transportation, 39(2), 409–432.
de Geus, B., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., Jannes, C., and Meeusen, R. (2008). “Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population.” Health Educ. Res., 23(4), 697–708.
Dill, J. (2009). “Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure.” J. Public Health Policy, 30, S95–S110.
Dill, J., and Carr, T. (2003). “Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: If you build them, commuters will use them.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1828, 116–123.
Dill, J., and Voros, K. (2007). “Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, region.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2031, 9–17.
Goodman, A., Panter, J., Sharp, S. J., and Ogilvie, D. (2013). “Effectiveness and equity impacts of town-wide cycling initiatives in England: A longitudinal, controlled natural experimental study.” Social Sci. Med., 97, 228–237.
Goodman, A., Sahlqvist, S., and Ogilvie, D. (2014). “New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: One- and 2-year findings from the U.K. iConnect study.” Am. J. Public Health, 104(9), e38–e46.
Handy, S., van Wee, B., and Kroesen, M. (2014). “Promoting cycling for transport: Research needs and challenges.” Transp. Rev., 34(1), 4–24.
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., and Maat, K. (2010). “Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature.” Transp. Rev., 30(1), 59–96.
Hopkinson, P., and Wardman, M. (1996). “Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities.” Transp. Policy, 3(4), 241–249.
Howard, C., and Burns, E. (2001). “Cycling to work in Phoenix: Route choice, travel behavior, and commuter characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1773, 39–46.
Hunt, J. D., and Abraham, J. E. (2007). “Influences on bicycle use.” Transportation, 34(4), 453–470.
Krizek, K., Barnes, G., and Thompson, K. (2009a). “Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 66–73.
Krizek, K. J., Handy, S. L., and Forsyth, A. (2009b). “Explaining changes in walking and bicycling behavior: Challenges for transportation research.” Environ. Plann. B, 36(4), 725–740.
Lee, S., Tremble, M., Vaivai, J., Rowangould, G., Tayarani, M., and Poorfakhraei, A. (2015). “Central New Mexico climate change scenario planning project: Final report.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation Volpe Center, Cambridge, MA.
Ma, L., and Dill, J. (2015). “Associations between the objective and perceived built environment and bicycling for transportation.” J. Transp. Health, 2(2), 248–255.
Macbeth, A. (1999). “Bicycle lanes in Toronto.” ITE J., 69(4), 38–46.
McKenzie, B. (2014). Modes less traveled—Bicycling and walking to work in the United States: 2008–2012, U. S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.
Moudon, A. V., et al. (2005). “Cycling and the built environment, a U.S. perspective.” Transp. Res. Part D, 10(3), 245–261.
Nelson, A., and Allen, D. (1997). “If You build them, commuters will use them: Association between bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1578, 79–83.
Ogilvie, D., et al. (2012). “Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a “natural experiment” in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: Methods for the core module of the iConnect study.” BMJ Open, 2(1), e000694.
Parker, K. M., Gustat, J., and Rice, J. C. (2011). “Installation of bicycle lanes and increased ridership in an urban, mixed-income setting in New Orleans, Louisiana.” J. Phys. Act Health, 8(1), S98–S102.
Parkin, J., Wardman, M., and Page, M. (2007). “Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data.” Transportation, 35(1), 93–109.
Piatkowski, D. P., Krizek, K. J., and Handy, S. L. (2015). “Accounting for the short term substitution effects of walking and cycling in sustainable transportation.” Travel Behav. Soc., 2(1), 32–41.
Pucher, J., Dill, J., and Handy, S. (2010). “Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review.” Preventive Med., 50, S106–S125.
R v3.0.1 [Computer software]. R Foundation.
Sælensminde, K. (2004). “Cost-benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic.” Transp. Res. Part A, 38(8), 593–606.
Sener, I. N., Eluru, N., and Bhat, C. R. (2009). “An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US.” Transportation, 36(5), 511–539.
Shafizadeh, K., and Niemeier, D. (1997). “Bicycle journey-to-work: Travel behavior characteristics and spatial attributes.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1578, 84–90.
Stinson, M., and Bhat, C. (2003). “Commuter bicyclist route choice: Analysis using a stated preference survey.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1828, 107–115.
Tilahun, N. Y., Levinson, D. M., and Krizek, K. J. (2007). “Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 41(4), 287–301.
Wardman, M., Tight, M., and Page, M. (2007). “Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work.” Transp. Res. Part A, 41, 339–350.
Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). “Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small U.S. cities.” Transp. Res. Part D, 15(2), 73–81.
Zhao, P. (2014). “The impact of the built environment on bicycle commuting: Evidence from Beijing.” Urban Stud., 51(5), 1019–1037.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 142Issue 4December 2016

History

Received: Aug 25, 2015
Accepted: Mar 8, 2016
Published online: May 30, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gregory M. Rowangould, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 1 Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mohammad Tayarani
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, 1 Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, Albuquerque, NM 87131.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share