Technical Papers
Oct 1, 2013

Modeling the Effects of Pro Bicycle Infrastructure and Policies Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 140, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the potential of the bicycle as a sustainable mode of transport in a medium-sized Spanish city (Santander, in northern Spain) with strong inclines and relatively inclement weather. For this purpose, a general methodology has been designed that could serve as an example for other areas. First, potential bicycle users in the city are characterized and identified through a household survey, which included a complete travel diary. Then they were asked to participate in a stated preference survey designed to find out the relative importance of certain key variables, previously identified, associated with making bicycle journeys. These data were used to estimate mixed logit models allowing to correctly treat the pseudopanel nature of the data. The results indicate that the most important variables among potential users are the cost and the climate, followed by the availability of infrastructure such as cycle paths and an extensive network of both public and private bicycle docking stations. Finally, the willingness to change from traditional modes of transport, such as car and bus, to bicycle has been examined according to various policies designed to encourage more sustainable mobility (such as bicycle and bus lanes and a city center congestion charge for private cars). The main finding of this research has been the identification of the conditions under which the bicycle could increase its market share from its current 0.30% up to 5.52% in a city with the characteristics of Santander (i.e., not in principle conducive to expect high bicycle use).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Public Works (CEDEX), through their project “PRO-BICI: Metodología para la Planificación y Gestión de Estrategias de Promoción de la Bicicleta” (PT-2007-025-10IAPM). They are also grateful for the support of the Millennium Institute in Complex Engineering Systems (ICM: P-05-004-F; CONICYT: FBO16), the CEDEUS Centre, funded by CONICYT/FONDAP (15110020), and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

References

Akar, G., Fischer, N., and Namgung, M. (2013). “Bicycling choice and gender case study: The Ohio State University.” Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Transp., 7(5), 347–365.
Bergström, A., and Magnusson, R. (2003). “Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 37(8), 649–666.
Bliemer, M. C. J., and Rose, J. M. (2009). “Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice experiments.” Proc., 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Bowman, B., Vecellio, R., and Haynes, D. (1994). “Strategies for increasing bicycle and pedestrian safety and use.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 66–73.
Buehler, R., and Pucher, J. (2012). “Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes.” Transportation, 39(2), 409–432.
dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., and Cecin, P. (2010). “Modelling user perception of bus transit quality.” Transp. Policy, 17(6), 388–397.
dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., and Cecin, P. (2011a). “The quality of service desired by public transport.” Transp. Policy, 18(1), 217–227.
dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., and Moura, J. L. (2011b). “Implementing bike sharing systems.” Proc. Ins. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng., 164(2), 89–101.
Dill, J. (2009). “Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure.” J. Public Health Policy, 30, S95–S110.
Dill, J., and Carr, T. (2003). “Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: If you build them, commuters will use them—Another look.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1828(1), 116–123.
Eriksson, L., and Forward, S. E. (2011). “Is the intention to travel in a pro-environmental manner and the intention to use the car determined by different factors?” Transp. Res. D, 16(5), 372–376.
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., and Nordlund, A. M. (2008). “Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction.” Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 11(1), 10–23.
Garrard, J., Rose, G., and Lo, S. K. (2008). “Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure.” Prev. Med., 46(1), 55–59.
Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A., and Rose, J. M. (2006). “Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models.” Transp. Res. Part B, 40(1), 75–92.
Handy, S. L., Xing, Y., and Buehler, T. J. (2010). “Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: A study of six small U.S. cities.” Transportation, 37(6), 967–985.
Hensher, D. A., and Greene, W. H. (2003). “The mixed logit model: The state of practice.” Transportation, 30(2), 133–176.
Hunt, J. D., and Abraham, J. E. (2007). “Influences on bicycle use.” Transportation, 34(4), 453–470.
Ibeas, A., dell’ Olio, L., Barreda, R. (2011). “Citizen involvement in promoting sustainable mobility.” J. Transp. Geogr., 19(4), 475–487.
Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., and Thompson, K. (2009). “Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 66–73.
Krizek, K. J., El-Geneidy, A., and Thompson, K. (2007). “A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists’ travel.” Transportation, 34(5), 611–624.
Krizek, K. J., Johnson, P. J., and Tilahun, N. (2005). “Gender differences in bicycling behaviour and facility preferences. Research on women’s issues in transportation.” 35, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Krizek, K. J., and Roland, R. W. (2005). “What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings.” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ., 10(1), 55–68.
Larsen, J., and El-Geneidy, A. (2011). “A travel behaviour analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montréal, Canada.” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ., 16(2), 172–177.
Lindsey, G., and Nguyen, D. (2004). “Use of greenway trails in Indiana.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 213–217.
Martens, K. (2004). “The bicycle as a feeder mode: Experiences from three European countries.” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ., 9(4), 281–294.
Moudon, A. V., et al. (2005). “Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective.” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ., 10(3), 245–261.
Nankervis, M. (1999). “The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 33(6), 417–431.
Nelson, A. C., and Allen, D. (1997). “If you build them, commuters will use them: Association between bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1578(1), 79–83.
Ortúzar, J. de D., Iacobelli, A., and Valeze, C. (2000). “Estimating demand for a cycle-way network.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 34(5), 353–373.
Ortúzar, J. de D., Iacobelli, A., and Valeze, C. (2010). “Estimación de la demanda para una red de ciclovías.” Obesidad ¿Qué podemos hacer? F. Mardones, N. Velasco and J. Rozowski, eds., Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
Ortúzar, J. de D., and Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transport, 4th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
Parkin, J., Ryley, T., and Jones, T. (2007). “Barriers to cycling: An exploration of quantitative analyses.” Cycling and society, P. Rosen, P. Cox and D. Horton, eds., Ashgate, Farnham, UK, 67–82.
Polk, M. (2003). “Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transportation system in Sweden?” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ., 8(2), 75–95.
Pucher, J., and Buehler, R. (2006). “Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies.” Transp. Policy, 13(3), 265–279.
Pucher, J., Komanoff, C., and Schimek, P. (1999). “Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 33(7–8), 625–654.
Rastogi, R. (2010). “Willingness to shift to walking or bicycling to access suburban rail: Case study of Mumbai, India.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 3–10.
Rietveld, P. (2000). “Non-motorised modes in transport systems: A multimodal chain perspective for the Netherlands.” Transp. Res., 5(1), 31–36.
Rose, J. M., and Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009). “Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs.” Transp. Rev., 29(5), 587–617.
Sælensminde, K. (2004). “Cost-benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 38(8), 593–606.
Sillano, M., and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2005). “Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: Some new evidence.” Environ. Plann., 37(3), 525–550.
Tilahun, N. Y., Levinson, D. M., and Krizek, K. J. (2007). “Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 41(4), 287–301.
Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wardman, M., Tight, M., and Page, M. (2007). “Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work.” Transp. Res. Pol. Pract., 41(4), 339–350.
Winters, M., Davidson, G., Kao, D., and Teschke, K. (2011). “Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: Comparing influences on decisions to ride.” Transportation, 38(1), 153–168.
Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). “Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities.” Transp. Res. Transp. Environ. 15(2), 73–81.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 140Issue 2June 2014

History

Received: Mar 17, 2013
Accepted: Sep 28, 2013
Published online: Oct 1, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 6, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luigi dell’Olio [email protected]
Professor, Departamento de Transporte y Tecnología de Proyectos y Procesos, Universidad de Cantabria, Av. de Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Cantabria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Angel Ibeas [email protected]
Professor, Departamento de Transporte y Tecnología de Proyectos y Procesos, Universidad de Cantabria, Av. de Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Cantabria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Maria Bordagaray [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Departamento de Transporte y Tecnología de Proyectos y Procesos, Universidad de Cantabria, Av. de Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Cantabria, Spain (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Juan de Dios Ortúzar [email protected]
Professor, Departamento de Ingeniería de Transporte y Logística, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Código 105, Santiago 22, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share