Effects of Freeway Mileage-Based Toll Scheme on the Short-Range Driver’s Route Choice Behavior
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 140, Issue 2
Abstract
A mileage-based toll scheme will soon be adopted by Taiwan’s freeway system to replace the current toll station–based model. This new policy will increase the travel cost to some short-range drivers, and they may therefore choose to switch to alternate routes, depending on their perception of the equity and acceptability of the new toll scheme. This study attempts to utilize structural equations and the discrete-choice model to analyze the perceived attitudes of highway drivers toward the mileage-based toll scheme, as well as the effects of the perceived attitudes on route choice behaviors. The results show that perceived equity as well as perceived effectiveness and efficiency have positive effects on the acceptability of toll schemes and the utility to highway users, while switching barriers have negative effects on the utility to highway drivers. In addition, we have established a binary Logit model that incorporates perceived latent variables, the results of which show that a switching behavior model that has included perceived latent variables contributes a more reasonable explanation of the actual decision-making behaviors of drivers and enhances the explanatory capability of the model. Finally, the analysis of the route choice model reveals that when the trip mileage of short-range drivers increases to 30 km or above, all the perceived latent variables do not appear to have any impact on their decision of route choice. Although drivers who decide to remain on the freeway will be required to pay the toll, they will also be compensated with improved driving speeds on the freeway.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Taiwan Area National Freeway Bureau of MOTC for providing research-related data and information, and to Huei-Ting Lee for providing programming and statistical support.
References
AMOS 6.0 (2008). [Computer software]. SPSS, IBM.
Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D. A., Morikawa, T., and Polydoropoulou, A. (2002). “Integration of choice and latent variable models.” In perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Eliasson, J., and Lundberg, M. (2003). Road pricing in urban areas, Transek AB, Vägverket.
Forkenbrock, D. J., and Hanley, P. F. (2006). “Mileage-based road user charges.” Public Roads, 69(5), 2.
Fujii, S., Garling, T., and Jakobsson, C. (2004). “A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners’ acceptance of road pricing.” Transplantation, 31(3), 285–295.
Garling, T., Jakobsson, C., Loukopoulos, P., and Fujii, S. (2008). “Acceptability of road pricing.” Chapter 3, Pricing in road transport: Multidisciplinary perspectives, E. Verhoef, B. Van Wee, L. Steg, and M. Bliema, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 193–208.
Golob, T. F. (2003). “Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research.” Transp. Res. Part B, 37, 1–25.
Guo, Y. W. (2010). “Expressway implementation of electronic metered driver is willing to pay the prevailing rate analysis.” Transp. Plann. Q., 2(39), 223–250.
Highway Trust Fund. (2012). “Pilot program could help determine the viability of mileage fees for certain vehicles.” GAO Rep. to the Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., and Garling, T. (2000). “Determinants of private car user’s acceptance of road pricing.” Transp. Policy, 7(2), 153–158.
Ministry of Transportation and Communication. (2002). Rep. on Computing and Setting the Toll Rate of Ramp Toll Collection System of Freeway, Taiwan.
National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission. (2009). Paying our way: A new framework for transportation finance, Washington, DC.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Piriyawat, S., Van, H. T., and Fujii, S. (2009). “The roles of perceived effectiveness and problem awareness in the acceptability of road pricing in Bangkok.” Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 31(2), 181–188.
Poole, R. (2012). Economists vs. realists on mileage-based user fees—finding the best way to replace gas taxes with mileage-based user fees, The Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, CA.
Schade, J., and Schlag, B. (2000). “Acceptability of urban transport pricing.”, Government Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Schade, J., and Schlag, B. (2003). “Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies.” Transp. Res. F, 6(1), 45–61.
Schlag, B., and Teubel, U. (1997). “Public acceptability of transport pricing.” IATSS Res., 21, 134–142.
Schuitema, G., Ubbels, B., Steg, L., and Verhoef, E. (2008). “Car users’ acceptability of a kilometer charge.” Pricing in road transport, E. Verhoef, B. Van Wee, L. Steg and M. Bliema, eds., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 209–226.
SPSS (2011). [Computer software]. Statistics 20.0, IBM.
Steg, L., and Schuitema, G. (2007). “Behavioral responses to transport pricing: A theoretical analysis.” Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: Problems, causes, solutions, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 347–366.
Xerox Corporation. (2012). “Mileage based user fees: use as you cruise—alternative funding to the fuel tax.” 〈http://www.acs-inc.com/wp-tsg-mileage-based-user-fees.pdf〉 (Jan. 10, 2013).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2012
Accepted: Jun 17, 2013
Published online: Jun 19, 2013
Discussion open until: May 31, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.