Technical Papers
Apr 27, 2022

Structural Redundancy, Robustness, and Disproportionate Collapse Analysis of Highway Bridge Superstructures

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 7

Abstract

Performance-based design and system-level assessment methods are becoming the preferred approaches for evaluating the safety of structures. This is particularly important for highway bridges where, because of their exposure to long-term deterioration as well as sudden localized failures, the generally conservative traditional member-oriented approach does not necessarily lead to an accurate evaluation of the actual structural system’s safety levels nor, consequently, to the efficient allocation of the limited resources available for infrastructure management. The objective of this paper is to quantify the effect of damage size and location on bridge elements and how this affects the performance of the entire superstructure system. The paper also presents a simplified equation for estimating the structural robustness of typical highway girder bridge superstructures as a function of the damage type. A numerical example is presented to illustrate alternative approaches for how these concepts could be implemented during the design and safety assessment of highway bridges. In particular, the analysis showed that the occurrence of damage directly under the live load reduced the ultimate capacity of the system in the range of 70%–95%. This reduction was between 40% and 70% when the damage was located away from the loaded zone.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the thorough analysis of the manuscript and for the useful suggestions provided to improve the quality of the paper. The first author also acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Grant Nos. DGECR-2021-00335 and RGPIN-2021-03341. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents of the paper do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of NSERC.

References

AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO MBE manual for bridge evaluation. 3th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019. AASHTO guide specifications for analysis and identification of fracture critical members and system redundant members. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Anitori, G., J. Casas, and M. Ghosn. 2013. “Redundancy and robustness in the design and evaluation of bridges: European and North American perspectives.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (12): 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000545.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bergal, J. 2018. Trucks vs. bridges: Dangerous and costly. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Biondini, F., D. M. Frangopol, and S. Restelli. 2008. “On structural robustness, redundancy, and static indeterminacy.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bontempi, F. 2019. “Elementary concepts of structural robustness of bridges and viaducts.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 9 (5): 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00362-7.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, and A. K. Agrawal. 2020. “Miami pedestrian bridge collapse: Computational forensic analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001532.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Basis of structural design. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Actions on structures. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CNSA (Canada’s National Statistics Agency). 2016. Canada’s core public infrastructure survey: Roads, bridges and tunnels. Ottawa, ON: CNSA.
Deng, L., and M. Ghosn. 2000. “Nonlinear analysis of composite steel girder bridges.” Eng. J. Am. Inst. Steel Constr. 37 (4): 140–156.
Deng, L., M. Ghosn, A. Znidaric, and J. R. Casas. 2001. “Nonlinear flexural behavior of prestressed concrete girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (4): 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:4(276).
Dusenberry, D. O. 2022. “New SEI/ASCE disproportionate collapse mitigation standard.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (4): 04022014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003305.
Ellingwood, B. R., and D. O. Dusenberry. 2005. “Building design for abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 20 (3): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00387.x.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2021a. LTPP InfoPave. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2021b. National bridge inventory. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fiorillo, G. 2016. “Reliability and risk analysis of bridge networks.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City College of the City Univ. of New York.
Fiorillo, G., and M. Ghosn. 2015. “Application of influence lines for the ultimate capacity of beams under moving loads.” Eng. Struct. 103 (Nov): 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.003.
Fiorillo, G., and M. Ghosn. 2018. “MPI parallel Monte Carlo framework for the reliability analysis of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (2): 04017087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000735.
Fiorillo, G., F. Miao, and M. Ghosn. 2016. “Direct redundancy evaluation of bridges designated as fracture-critical.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (3): 04015045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000798.
Frangopol, D. M., and J. P. Curley. 1987. “Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability.” J. Struct. Eng. 113 (7): 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:7(1533).
Gaylord, E. H., and C. N. Gaylord. 1990. Structural engineering handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ghosn, M., J. Casas, and J. M. Xu. 1996. “Development of an efficient program for the nonlinear analysis of bridges.” Comput. Struct. 61 (3): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(96)00098-3.
Ghosn, M., G. Fiorillo, M. Liu, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2019. Risk-based structural evaluation methods. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ghosn, M., and F. Moses. 1998. Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Ghosn, M., F. Moses, and D. M. Frangopol. 2010. “Redundancy and robustness of highway bridge superstructures and substructures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1–2): 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802664498.
Ghosn, M., J. Yang, D. Beal, and B. Sivakumar. 2014. Bridge system safety and redundancy. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Harries, K. A., J. Kasan, R. Miller, and R. Brinkman. 2012. Updated research for collision damage and repair of prestressed concrete beams. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. Berlin: Springer.
Kathol, S., A. Azizinamini, and J. Luedke. 1995. Strength capacity of steel girder bridges. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Roads.
Lichtenstein, A. G. 1993. “The silver bridge collapse recounted.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 7 (4): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1993)7:4(249).
Lwin, M. 2012. Clarification of requirements for fracture critical members. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Mahoney, N. 2020. Two oversize trucks hit same Texas bridge. Chattanooga, TN: Freightwaves Media.
Malomo, D., N. Scattarreggia, A. Orgnoni, R. Pinho, M. Moratti, and G. M. Calvi. 2020. “Numerical study on the collapse of the Morandi bridge.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (4): 04020044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001428.
McKenna, F. 1997. “Object-oriented finite-element programming: Frameworks for analysis, algorithms, and parallel computing.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California.
McKenna, F., M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2010. “Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
Michel, G., and M. Fred. 1998. Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Moses, F. 2001. Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nowak, A. S. 1995. “Calibration of LRFD bridge code.” J. Bridge Eng. 121: 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121%3A8(1245).
Parzen, E. 1962. “On estimation of a probability density function and mode.” Ann. Math. Stat. 33 (3): 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704472.
PCI (Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2011. PCI bridge design manual. Chicago, IL: PCI.
Quinley, R. 2010. WIM data analyst’s manual. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Ramberg, W., and W. Osgood. 1943. Description of stress strain curves by three parameters. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Rosenblueth, E. 1975. “Point estimates for probability moments.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72 (10): 3812–3814. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.10.3812.
Starossek, U. 2006. “Progressive collapse of bridges, aspects of analysis and design.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Sea-Crossing Long-Span Bridges, Mokpo, Korea, 1–22. State College, PA: Citeseer.
Starossek, U., and M. Haberland. 2010. “Disproportionate collapse: Terminology and procedures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000138.
Williamson, E., K. Frank, V. Samaras, J. Kim, B. Neuman, J. Sutton, J. Mouras, C. Hovell, and T. Barnard. 2010. Modeling the response of fracture critical steel box-girder bridges. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Sep 16, 2021
Accepted: Feb 15, 2022
Published online: Apr 27, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-056X. Email: [email protected]
Michel Ghosn, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City College of the City Univ. of New York, 160 Convent Ave., New York, NY 10031. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Progressive Collapse Analysis of the Champlain Towers South in Surfside, Florida, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12485, 150, 1, (2024).
  • Twenty Years of Advances in Disproportionate Collapse Research and Best Practices since 9/11/2001, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12056, 149, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share