Technical Papers
Apr 22, 2022

Unified Truss-Arch Model for the Analysis of Bending-Shear Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Members

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 7

Abstract

The compatibility strut-and-tie method (C-STM) is a well-established nonlinear modeling tool to efficiently and accurately predict the overall load–deformation response of shear-critical RC members subjected to combined bending and shear. Such a high-performance tool, however, is computationally demanding. In this paper, a simplified limit analysis model based on C-STM is presented to predict the load-carrying capacity of RC beams. Amenable for hand methods of analysis, the approach is called the truss-arch model unified (TAMU). The TAMU approach accounts for the failure mechanism of the diagonal concrete strut that is softened because of the transverse tensile strain. Instead of providing overall force–deformation behavior, this model focuses on evaluating the ultimate load-carrying capacity by assuming the failure mechanism occurs when the principal diagonal strut reaches its softened strength in shear-critical beams. An explicit equation for the principal strain ratio is derived to evaluate the softened concrete strength and is used to develop formulas for the ultimate load-carrying capacity. The validity of the formulas is verified through a comparison of the predicted ultimate load-carrying capacities with maximum measured strengths from previous experimental results on large-scale physical tests representing bridge piers. The TAMU approach is then compared with other code-based strength analysis methods and shows better predictions of the maximum load-carrying capacity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Birely, A. C., K. J. Yole, J. D. Lee, C. D. McKee, and J. B. Mander. 2020. “Experimental behavior of reinforced concrete and pretensioned concrete bent caps.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (2): 04019137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001392.
Birrcher, D. B., R. G. Tuchscherer, M. Huizinga, and O. Bayrak. 2014. “Depth effect in deep beams.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (4): 731–740. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687002.
Bracci, J. M., P. B. Keating, and M. B. D. Hueste. 2000. Cracking in RC bent caps. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Brown, M. D., and O. Bayrak. 2008. “Design of deep beams using strut-and-tie models—Part I: Evaluating US provisions.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (4): 395–404.
Fenwick, R. C., and T. Paulay. 1968. “Mechanisms of shear resistance of concrete beams.” J. Struct. Div. 94 (10): 2325–2350. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002092.
FIP (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 1996. Practical design of structural concrete. London: FIP.
He, Z.-Q., Z. Liu, and Z. J. Ma. 2012. “Investigation of load-transfer mechanisms in deep beams and corbels.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (4): 467–476.
Hwang, S.-J., W.-Y. Lu, and H.-J. Lee. 2000. “Shear strength prediction for deep beams.” ACI Struct. J. 97 (3): 367–376.
Karthik, M. M., J. B. Mander, and S. Hurlebaus. 2016. “Displacement-based compatibility strut-and-tie method and application to monotonic and cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 142 (6): 04016010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001457.
Karthik, M. M., J. B. Mander, and S. Hurlebaus. 2020. “Simulating behaviour of large reinforced concrete beam-column joints subject to ASR/DEF deterioration and influence of corrosion.” Eng. Struct. 222 (Jan): 111064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111064.
Kim, J. H., and J. B. Mander. 1999. Truss modeling of reinforced concrete shear-flexure behavior. New York: State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
Kim, J. H., and J. B. Mander. 2000a. “Cyclic inelastic strut-tie modeling of shear-critical reinforced concrete members.” ACI Spec. Publ. 193 (5): 707–728.
Kim, J. H., and J. B. Mander. 2000b. “Seismic detailing of reinforced concrete beam-column connections.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 10 (6): 589–601. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.6.589.
Lee, J. D. 2020. “Development of a truss-arch model unified for flexure and shear-critical interaction of structural concrete members.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Liu, S.-H., J. M. Bracci, J. B. Mander, and S. Hurlebaus. 2017. “Performance of D-regions affected by alkali-silica reaction: Experimental and analytical study.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (9): 04017109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001847.
Marti, P. 1985. “Basic tools of reinforced concrete beam design.” ACI J. Proc. 82 (1): 46–56.
Matsumoto, E. E., M. C. Waggoner, G. Sumen, M. E. Kreger, S. L. Wood, and J. E. Breen. 2001. Development of a precast bent cap system. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
McKee, C. D., J. D. Lee, A. C. Birely, and J. B. Mander. 2020. “Experimental behavior of pretensioned bent caps with internal voids for weight reduction.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001410.
Park, R., and T. Paulay. 1975. Reinforced concrete structures. New York: Wiley.
Paulay, T. 1971. “Coupling beams of reinforced concrete shear walls.” J. Struct. Div. 97 (3): 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002848.
Sahoo, D. K., M. S. V. Sagi, B. Singh, and P. Bhargava. 2010. “Effect of detailing of web reinforcement on the behavior of bottle-shaped struts.” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 8 (3): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.8.303.
Schlaich, J., K. Schaefer, and M. Jennewein. 1987. “Toward a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J. 32 (3): 74–150. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150.
Scott, R. M., J. B. Mander, and J. M. Bracci. 2012a. “Compatibility strut-and-tie modeling: Part I—Formulation.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (5): 635–644.
Scott, R. M., J. B. Mander, and J. M. Bracci. 2012b. “Compatibility strut-and-tie modeling: Part II—Implementation.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (5): 645–653.
Vecchio, F. J. 2000. “Analysis of shear-critical reinforced concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 97 (1): 102–110.
Young, B. S., J. M. Bracci, P. B. Keating, and M. B. D. Hueste. 2002. “Cracking in reinforced concrete bent caps.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 488–498.
Zhu, R. R. H., W. Wanichakorn, T. T. C. Hsu, and J. Vogel. 2003. “Crack width prediction using compatibility-aided strut-and-tie model.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (4): 413–421.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Aug 19, 2021
Accepted: Feb 23, 2022
Published online: Apr 22, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, Roadside Safety and Physical Security Division, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-9014. Email: [email protected]
John B. Mander, M.ASCE [email protected]
Zachry Professor in Design and Construction Integration I, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Assessment and Simplification of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Sectional Shear Design Using V-M Interaction Diagram, ACI Structural Journal, 10.14359/51736125, 120, 1, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share