Technical Papers
Jun 5, 2020

National Bridge Inventory Data-Based Stochastic Modeling for Deck Condition Rating of Prestressed Concrete Bridges

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25, Issue 3

Abstract

About 9% of bridges in the United States were classified as deficient bridges at the beginning of 2018 with about $123 billion needed for bridge rehabilitation. The bridge decks represent the highest budget associated with bridge maintenance because they deteriorate faster compared with the other components, because of direct exposure to traffic and harsh climate changes. The subjectivity in determining the condition rating is an imprecise process and may significantly affect the maintenance process, which may vary from one inspector to another. Moreover, most research works in prestressed concrete bridges condition ratings have focused predominantly on modeling and have neglected to study the individual effect of geometric variables with excluding the impact of aging and maintenance on the condition rating. The paper’s objectives and proposed contributions are investigating and modeling the impact of explanatory variables on deck condition rating apart from aging and maintenance actions. The findings highlight the design’s contribution to reducing the decline of a bridge condition rating. The stochastic regression analysis has been used to propose a realistic deck condition through a probability distribution. Four models have been developed using the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) of California, and results showed a satisfied coefficient of determination. The developed models have been validated with satisfactory results of 87% using the Average Validity Percentage Method. The developed models will help highway agencies make better decisions regarding future maintenance plans by prioritizing the bridge’s maintenance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party (FHWA bridge inspection data). Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider, as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the FHWA for providing bridge inspection data.

References

Al-Barqawi, H., and T. Zayed. 2006. “Condition rating model for underground infrastructure sustainable water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (2): 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:2(126).
Andersen, N. J. H., and J. Brandstrup. 2008. Monte Carlo simulation in crystal ball 7.3. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Univ.
Bektas, B. A., A. Carriquiry, and O. Smadi. 2012. “Using classification trees for predicting national bridge inventory condition ratings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (4): 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000143.
Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Gopinath. 1995. “Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:1(33).
Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Bu, G., J. Lee, H. Guan, M. Blumenstein, and Y. C. Loo. 2012. “Development of an integrated method for probabilistic bridge-deterioration modeling.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (2): 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000421.
Busa, G. D. 1985. “Modeling concrete bridge deck deterioration.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2017. “Framework for mitigating human bias in the selection of explanatory variables for bridge deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000352.
Chyad, A. M., O. Abudayyeh, F. Zakhil, and O. Hakimi. 2018. “Deterioration rates of concrete bridge decks in several climatic regions.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Electro/Information Technology, 65–68. New York: IEEE.
Contreras-Nieto, C. 2017. “A data-driven approach to support bridge asset management.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ.
Contreras-Nieto, C., Y. Shan, and P. Lewis. 2018. “Characterization of steel bridge superstructure deterioration through data mining techniques.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001205.
Dekelbab, W., A. Al-Wazeer, and B. Harris. 2008. “History lessons from the national bridge inventory.” Public Roads 71 (6): 30.
DeStefano, P. D., and D. A. Grivas. 1998. “Method for estimating transition probability in bridge deterioration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 4 (2): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:2(56).
Dunker, K. F., and B. G. Rabbat. 1995. “Assessing infrastructure deficiencies: The case of highway bridges.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(100).
Fares, H., K. Shahata, E. Elwakil, A. Eweda, T. Zayed, M. Abdelrahman, and I. Basha. 2012. “Modeling the performance of pavement marking in cold weather conditions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (11): 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.504212.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Hasan, M. S., S. Setunge, D. W. Law, and Y. C. Koay. 2015. “Forecasting deterioration of bridge components from visual inspection data.” Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7 (1): 40. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2015.V7.763.
Huang, R. Y., I. S. Mao, and H. K. Lee. 2010. “Exploring the deterioration variables of RC bridge decks: A rough set approach.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 25 (7): 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00665.x.
Inkoom, S., and J. Sobanjo. 2018. “Availability functions as a bridge element’s importance weight in computing the overall bridge health index.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (12): 1598–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1476561.
Kallen, M. J., and J. M. Van Noortwijk. 2006. “Statistical inference for Markov deterioration models of bridge conditions in the Netherlands.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, 16–19. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kelly, A. L., R. A. Atadero, and H. N. Mahmoud. 2019. “Life cycle cost analysis of deteriorated bridge expansion joints.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (1): 04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000407.
Kim, Y. J., and D. K. Yoon. 2010. “Identifying critical sources of bridge deterioration in cold regions through the constructed bridges in North Dakota.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000087.
Kirkpatrick, T. J. 2001. “Impact of specification changes on the chloride-induced corrosion service life of Virginia bridge decks.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Kleywegt, A. J., and K. C. Sinha. 1994. “Tools for bridge management data analysis.” Transp. Res. Circ. 8 (423): 16–26.
Lavrenz, S., J. Murillo-Hoyos, M. J. Volovski, T. U. Saeed, and S. Labi. 2015. “Service life and condition rating prediction of steel bridges.” In Proc., 8th Int. Symp. on Steel Bridges: Innovation & New Challenges 2015, 667–674. Istanbul, Turkey: Turkish Constructional Steelwork Association.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2016. “Semantic modeling of bridge deterioration knowledge for supporting big bridge data analytics.” In Proc., 2016 ASCE Construction Research Congress, 930–939. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Madanat, S., R. Mishalani, and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(120).
Manafpour, A., I. Guler, A. Radlińska, F. Rajabipour, and G. Warn. 2018. “Stochastic analysis and time-based modeling of concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001285.
Mauch, M., and S. Madanat. 2001. “Semiparametric hazard rate models of reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(49).
Mohammadi, J., S. A. Guralnick, and R. Polepeddi. 1998. “Bridge fatigue life estimation from field data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 3 (3): 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1998)3:3(128).
Moomen, M., Y. Qiao, B. R. Agbelie, S. Labi, and K. C. Sinha. 2016. “Empirical analysis of concrete bridge superstructure condition: Influential factors and deterioration prediction. In Proc., of 95th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board.” Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Morcous, G. 2011. Developing deterioration models for Nebraska bridges. Lincoln, NB: Mid-America Transportation Center.
Morcous, G., H. Rivard, and A. M. Hanna. 2002. “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (3): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:3(86).
Nabizadeh, A., H. Tabatabai, and M. Tabatabai. 2018. “Survival analysis of bridge superstructures in Wisconsin.” Appl. Sci. 8 (11): 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112079.
Qiao, Y., M. Moomen, Z. Zhang, B. Agbelie, S. Labi, and K. C. Sinha. 2016. “Modeling deterioration of bridge components with binary Probit techniques with random effects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2550 (1): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.3141/2550-13.
Saeed, T. U., M. Moomen, A. Ahmed, J. Murillo-Hoyos, M. Volovski, and S. Labi. 2017. “Performance evaluation and life prediction of highway concrete bridge superstructure across design types.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001051.
Saeed, T. U., Y. Qiao, M. Moomen, A. Ahmed, and S. Labi. 2016. “Discrete-outcome modeling of bridge component deterioration: Accounting for the effects of maintenance and observation-specific correlation using random effects.” In Proc., Maintenance, Monitoring, Safety, Risk, and Resilience of Bridges and Bridge Networks, 380. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sayed, S. M., H. N. Sunna, and P. R. Moore. 2018. “Integrated bridge load rating allowing rational assessment of foundation reuse.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 23 (3): 04018014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000369.
Shahin, M. Y. 2005. Vol. 501 of Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots. New York: Springer.
Sobanjo, J. O., and P. D. Thompson. 2011. Enhancement of the FDOT’s project level and network-level bridge management analysis tools. Tallahassee, FL: Florida DOT.
Tolliver, D., and P. Lu. 2012. “Analysis of bridge deterioration rates: A case study of the northern plains region.” J. Transp. Res. Forum 50 (2): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/jtrf.50.2.2736.
USDOT. 2017. “Federal highway administration national bridge inventory.” Accessed November 10, 2017. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2017.cfm.
Veshosky, D., C. R. Beidleman, G. W. Buetow, and M. Demir. 1994. “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2123).
Williamson, G. S. 2007. “Service life modeling of Virginia Bridge decks.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Winn, E. K., and R. Burgueño. 2013. Development and validation of deterioration models for concrete bridge decks. Phase 1: Artificial intelligence models and bridge management systems, 168. Lansing, MI: Michigan DOT.
Yunovich, M., and N. G. Thompson. 2003. “Corrosion of highway bridges: Economic impact and control methodologies.” Concr. Int. 25 (1): 52–57.
Zayed, T. M., and D. W. Halpin. 2005. “Pile construction productivity assessment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (6): 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(705).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: May 14, 2019
Accepted: Mar 13, 2020
Published online: Jun 5, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sahar Hasan, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Construction Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907; Lecturer, Construction and Project Management Institute, Housing, and Building National Research Center, Ad Doqi 11511, Egypt.
Emad Elwakil, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Construction Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share