Abstract

For the residual strength prediction of corroded pipelines, the existing standard has a small application range, and the finite-element method has too many assumptions. This paper proposes a new data-driven prediction framework. Firstly, principal component analysis (PCA) is used to reduce the dimensions of the existing data to determine the input-output structure of the prediction model. Secondly, support vector machine (SVM) based on multiobjective optimization is employed to predict the pipeline’s residual strength. Compared with the traditional estimation methods, the model proposed in this paper is data-driven and combines data dimension reduction, multiobjective optimization, and a machine learning model. In addition, the accuracy and stability of the model are considered in the multiobjective optimization. The proposed framework is tested in a pipeline burst pressure data set. The results indicate that the mean absolute percentage error of the proposed models ranges from 1.353% to 3.220%, which has good prediction accuracy and stability. This paper also discusses the influence of the multiobjective optimization algorithm and dimension reduction on the prediction model. The following primary conclusions are drawn: (1) SVM optimized by multiobjective optimizer performs better than SVM optimized by the single-objective optimizer, and the original SVM performs worst, and (2) reducing the raw data dimensions can improve the residual strength prediction performance for corroded pipelines reduce the complexity of the model, and shorten the calculation time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China with Grant No. 2016YFE0200500, the Program of Changjiang Scholars of Ministry of Education, National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars with Grant No. 51625803, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

Alzabeebee, S. 2019. “Seismic response and design of buried concrete pipes subjected to soil loads.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 93 (Nov): 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103084.
Alzabeebee, S. 2020. “Application of EPR-MOGA in computing the liquefaction-induced settlement of a building subjected to seismic shake.” Eng. Comput. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01159-9.
Alzabeebee, S., D. N. Chapman, and A. Faramarzi. 2018. “Development of a novel model to estimate bedding factors to ensure the economic and robust design of rigid pipes under soil loads.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71 (Jan): 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.009.
Alzabeebee, S., D. N. Chapman, and A. Faramarzi. 2019. “Economical design of buried concrete pipes subjected to UK standard traffic loading.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 172 (2): 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00035.
Amaya-Gómez, R., F. Munoz Giraldo, F. Schoefs, E. Bastidas-Arteaga, and M. Sanchez-Silva. 2019. Vol. 1 of Recollected burst tests of experimental and FEM corroded pipelines. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bai, Y. 2012. “Study on burst pressure of steel pipeline with colonies of corrosion defects.” Master’s dissertation, School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology.
Bao, J., and W. Zhou. 2020. “Influence of the corrosion anomaly class on predictive accuracy of burst capacity models for corroded pipelines.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 6 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00227-w.
Benjamin, A. C., J. L. F. Freire, R. D. Vieira, and E. Q. de Andrade. 2006. “Burst tests on pipeline containing closely spaced corrosion defects.” In Vol. 47497 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 103–116. New York: ASME.
Bi, A., Z. Luo, Y. Song, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Residual strength analysis of internally corroded submarine pipeline based on FOA-GRNN model.” China Saf. Sci. J. 30 (6): 78–83. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.012.
Cai, W., G. Chen, and D. Pan. 1999. “Nonlinear analysis on residual strength of corroded pipeline.” J. China Univ. Pet. 23 (1): 66–68.
Chen, Y., H. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Li, and J. Zhou. 2015. “Failure analysis of high strength pipeline with single and multiple corrosions.” Mater. Des. 67 (Feb): 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.088.
Chin, K. T., T. Arumugam, S. Karuppanan, and M. Ovinis. 2020. “Failure pressure prediction of pipeline with single corrosion defect using artificial neural network.” Pipeline Sci. Technol. 4 (1 (3)): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-1-10-17.
Chmelko, V., and D. Biro. 2019. “Safety of pressure pipe operation with corrosive defect.” Procedia Struct. Integr. 17: 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.069.
Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. A. M. T. Meyarivan. 2002. “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 (2): 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017.
Dong, S., D. He, P. Zhang, and X. Deng. 2005. “The elastic and plastic finite element analysis of double points corrosive pipe.” Machinery 32 (9): 20–22.
Ebtehaj, I., H. Bonakdari, S. Shamshirband, Z. Ismail, and R. Hashim. 2017. “New approach to estimate velocity at limit of deposition in storm sewers using vector machine coupled with firefly algorithm.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (2): 04016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000252.
EGIG (European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group). 2020. “Gas pipeline incidents.” Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.egig.eu/reports.
Gholami, H., S. Shahrooi, and M. Shishesaz. 2020. “Predicting the burst pressure of high-strength carbon steel pipe with gouge flaws using artificial neural network.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (4): 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000478.
Han, H., and Z. Liu. 1998. “Limit load analysis for local wall-thinning pipeline under internal pressure.” Pressure Vessel Technol. 15 (4): 1–4.
Hopkins, P., and D. Jones. 1992. “A study of the behavior of long and complex-shaped corrosion in transmission pipelines.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 211–217. New York: ASME.
Jiménez, M., and A. Bilbao. 2009. “Pareto-optimal solutions in fuzzy multi-objective linear programming.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (18): 2714–2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.12.005.
Lu, H., T. Iseley, J. Matthews, W. Liao, and M. Azimi. 2021. “An ensemble model based on relevance vector machine and multi-objective SALP swarm algorithm for predicting burst pressure of corroded pipelines.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 203 (Aug): 108585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108585.
Lu, H., J. C. Matthews, M. Azimi, and T. Iseley. 2020. “Near real-time HDD pullback force prediction model based on improved radial basis function neural networks.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (4): 04020042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000490.
Lu, Y. J., and C. H. Wang. 2020. “Effects of geometry of a local thin area defect on remaining strength and fitness of pressure equipment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 65 (May): 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104125.
Marler, R. T., and J. S. Arora. 2004. “Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26 (6): 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6.
Mirjalili, S., S. Saremi, S. M. Mirjalili, and L. D. S. Coelho. 2016. “Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: A novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization.” Expert Syst. Appl. 47 (Apr): 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.039.
Mohd, M. H., B. J. Lee, Y. Cui, and J. K. Paik. 2015. “Residual strength of corroded subsea pipelines subject to combined internal pressure and bending moment.” Ships Offshore Struct. 10 (5): 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2015.1037678.
Mousavi, S. S., and A. S. Moghaddam. 2020. “Failure pressure estimation error for corroded pipeline using various revisions of ASME B31G.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 109 (Jan): 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104284.
Noble, W. S. 2006. “What is a support vector machine?” Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (12): 1565–1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1206-1565.
Peng, S., Z. Zhang, E. Liu, W. Liu, and W. Qiao. 2021. “A new hybrid algorithm model for prediction of internal corrosion rate of multiphase pipeline.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 85 (Jan): 103716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103716.
Shuai, J., C. Zhang, and F. Chen. 2008. “Prediction of failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on non-linear finite element analysis.” Acta Pet. Sin. 29 (6): 933–937.
Wold, S., K. Esbensen, and P. Geladi. 1987. “Principal component analysis.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2 (1–3): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9.
Xu, Z. D., Y. Yang, and A. N. Miao. 2021. “Dynamic analysis and parameter optimization of pipelines with multidimensional vibration isolation and mitigation device.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (1): 04020058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000504.
Zhang, Y. 2020. “Residual strength of multi-point corroded pipeline based on finite element and PSO-BP.” Master’s dissertation, School of Management, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology.
Zhu, F. 2020. “Pipeline residual strength evaluation based on PCA-PSO-BP neural network.” Oil-Gasfield Surf. Eng. 39 (7): 50–56.
Zhu, S. B., Z. L. Li, S. M. Zhang, L. L. Liang, and H. F. Zhang. 2018. “Natural gas pipeline valve leakage rate estimation via factor and cluster analysis of acoustic emissions.” Measurement 125 (Sep): 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.076.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 4November 2021

History

Received: Feb 26, 2021
Accepted: May 12, 2021
Published online: Jul 23, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hongfang Lu, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Zhao-Dong Xu, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tom Iseley, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Trenchless Technology Center, Louisiana Tech Univ., Ruston, LA 71270. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-5182. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A New Pipeline Condition Assessment Method Using a Multicomponent Interferometric Dictionary for Quantification of Pipeline Notches, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1518, 15, 2, (2024).
  • Metal Corrosion Rate Prediction of Small Samples Using an Ensemble Technique, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 10.32604/cmes.2022.020220, 134, 1, (267-291), (2023).
  • Theory and Machine Learning Modeling for Burst Pressure Estimation of Pipeline with Multipoint Corrosion, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1481, 14, 3, (2023).
  • Leveraging Machine Learning for Pipeline Condition Assessment, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1464, 14, 3, (2023).
  • Predicting Solid-Particle Erosion Rate of Pipelines Using Support Vector Machine with Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1367, 14, 2, (2023).
  • A Data-Driven Danger Zone Estimation Method Based on Bayesian Inference for Utility Tunnel Fires and Experimental Verification, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4280, 37, 1, (2023).
  • Mechanical behavior of high-pressure pipeline installed through horizontal directional drilling under seismic loads, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105073, 136, (105073), (2023).
  • An integrated modeling method of uncertainties: application-orientated fuzzy random spatiotemporal analysis of pipeline structures, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104825, 131, (104825), (2023).
  • Health Monitoring Technology Based on Artificial Intelligence, Pipeline Inspection and Health Monitoring Technology, 10.1007/978-981-19-6798-6_4, (117-212), (2023).
  • Background and Health Problems of Pipelines, Pipeline Inspection and Health Monitoring Technology, 10.1007/978-981-19-6798-6_1, (1-20), (2023).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share