Theory and Machine Learning Modeling for Burst Pressure Estimation of Pipeline with Multipoint Corrosion
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14, Issue 3
Abstract
Burst pressure is an essential parameter to measure the residual bearing capacity of pipelines with corrosion defects. Accurate prediction of burst pressure is beneficial to evaluate the remaining life of pipelines. The traditional estimation formulas mainly focus on single-point corrosion but seldom consider the case of multipoint corrosion. Although DNV-RP-F101 considers multipoint corrosion, this method only considers the influence of axial spacing of adjacent corrosion defects on burst pressure but does not consider the influence of circumferential spacing. This work refers to the pipe corrosion criterion (PCORRC) and DNV-RP-F101 methods and modifies the calculation formula of the PCORRC method by introducing (). The average relative error is only 11.46%, which is 27.65% lower than the previous formula. In addition, this paper presents a method for estimating the burst pressure of pipelines with multipoint corrosion defects. This method considers not only the axial spacing between defects but also the circumferential spacing. The results show that the maximum relative error is 6.52%. A machine learning modeling framework for predicting burst pressure in multipoint corroded pipelines is proposed. The case using radial basis function neural network as the prediction tool shows that the average Pearson correlation coefficient of the prediction results in the test set is 0.903, indicating that the prediction performance is good.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This article is funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220848) and Major Project of Fundamental Research on Frontier Leading Technology of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20222006).
References
Ahammed, M. 1997. “Prediction of remaining strength of corroded pressurised pipelines.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 71 (3): 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00081-6.
Arumugam, T., S. Karuppanan, and M. Ovinis. 2020. “Residual strength analysis of pipeline with circumferential groove corrosion subjected to internal pressure.” Mater. Today Proc. 29 (12): 88–93.
Benjamin, A. C., J. L. F. Freire, R. D. Vieira, and D. J. Cunha. 2016a. “Interaction of corrosion defects in pipelines—Part 1: Fundamentals.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 144 (Aug): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.05.007.
Benjamin, A. C., J. L. F. Freire, R. D. Vieira, and D. J. Cunha. 2016b. “Interaction of corrosion defects in pipelines—Part 2: MTI JIP database of corroded pipe tests.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 145 (Sep): 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.06.006.
Bjørnøy, O. H., G. Sigurdsson, and E. Cramer. 2000. “Residual strength of corroded pipelines, DNV test results.” In Proc., 10th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. Richardson, TX: OnePetro.
Cai, J., X. Jiang, G. Lodewijks, Z. Pei, and W. Wu. 2018. “Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with combined dent and metal loss.” Mar. Struct. 61 (14): 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.05.006.
Cao, L. 2016. “Residual strength evaluation method research of pipeline corrosion defects.” Master’s thesis, School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ.
Chaves, I. A., and R. E. Melchers. 2011. “Pitting corrosion in pipeline steel weld zones.” Corros. Sci. 53 (12): 4026–4032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.005.
Chen, Y., H. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Li, and J. Zhou. 2015. “Failure analysis of high strength pipeline with single and multiple corrosions.” Mater. Des. 67 (Feb): 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.088.
Chen, Z., X. Li, W. Wang, Y. Li, L. Shi, and Y. Li. 2023. “Residual strength prediction of corroded pipelines using multilayer perceptron and modified feedforward neural network.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 231 (Mar): 108980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108980.
Dewanbabee, H. 2009. Behaviour of corroded X46 steel pipe under internal pressure and axial load. Windsor, UK: Univ. of Windsor.
González-Arévalo, N. E., J. C. Velázquez, M. Díaz-Cruz, A. Cervantes-Tobón, G. Terán, E. Hernández-Sanchez, and S. Capula-Colindres. 2021. “Influence of aging steel on pipeline burst pressure prediction and its impact on failure probability estimation.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 120 (Jun): 104950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104950.
Hopkins, P., and D. G. Jones. 1992. “A study of the behavior of long and complex-shaped corrosion in transmission pipelines.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 211. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Idris, N. N., Z. Mustaffa, M. E. A. B. Seghier, and N. T. Trung. 2021. “Burst capacity and development of interaction rules for pipelines considering radial interacting corrosion defects.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 121 (20): 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105124.
Lu, H., T. Iseley, J. Matthews, W. Liao, and M. Azimi. 2021a. “An ensemble model based on relevance vector machine and multi-objective SALP swarm algorithm for predicting burst pressure of corroded pipelines.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 203 (Jun): 108585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108585.
Lu, H., H. Peng, Z. D. Xu, J. C. Matthews, N. Wang, and T. Iseley. 2022. “A feature selection—Based intelligent framework for predicting maximum depth of corroded pipeline defects.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 36 (5): 04022044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001753.
Lu, H., Z. D. Xu, T. Iseley, and J. C. Matthews. 2021b. “Novel data-driven framework for predicting residual strength of corroded pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000587.
Lu, H., Z. D. Xu, T. Iseley, H. Peng, and L. Fu. 2023. Pipeline inspection and health monitoring technology: The key to integrity management. Berlin: Springer.
Ma, B., J. Shuai, D. Liu, and K. Xu. 2013. “Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 32 (Apr): 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.015.
Ma, Y., J. Zheng, Y. Liang, J. J. Klemeš, J. Du, Q. Liao, H. Lu, and B. Wang. 2022. “Deeppipe: Theory-guided neural network method for predicting burst pressure of corroded pipelines.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 162 (Jun): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.036.
Noor, N., N. Ozman, and N. Yahaya. 2011. “Deterministic prediction of corroding pipeline remaining strength in marine environment using DNV RP-F101 (Part A).” J. Sustainability Sci. Manage. 6 (1): 69–78.
O’Grady, T. I., D. T. Hisey, and J. F. Kiefner. 1992a. “Method for evaluating corroded pipe addresses variety of patterns.” Oil Gas J. 90 (41): 91–95.
O’Grady, T. J., D. T. Hisey, and J. F. Kiefner. 1992b. “A systematic method for the evaluation of corroded pipelines.” In Pipeline engineering, 27–35. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Oh, D., J. Race, S. Oterkus, and B. Koo. 2020. “Burst pressure prediction of API 5L X-grade dented pipelines using deep neural network.” J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8 (10): 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100766.
Souza, R. D., A. C. Benjamin, R. D. Vieira, J. L. F. Freire, and J. T. P. Castro. 2007. “Part 4: Rupture tests of pipeline segments containing long real corrosion defects.” Exp. Tech. 31 (1): 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00134.x.
Stephens, D. R., and B. N. Leis. 2000. “Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to high-toughness pipe.” In Proc., Int. Pipeline Conf. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Su, Y., J. Li, B. Yu, Y. Zhao, and J. Yao. 2021. “Fast and accurate prediction of failure pressure of oil and gas defective pipelines using the deep learning model.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. 216: 108016.
Sun, J., and Y. F. Cheng. 2018. “Assessment by finite element modeling of the interaction of multiple corrosion defects and the effect on failure pressure of corroded pipelines.” Eng. Struct. 165 (Jun): 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.040.
Wang, C., J. Zheng, Y. Liang, Q. Liao, B. Wang, and H. Zhang. 2022. “Deeppipe: Operating condition recognition of multiproduct pipeline based on KPCA-CNN.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 13 (2): 04022006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000641.
Wang, Y., L. Xu, J. Sun, and Y. F. Cheng. 2021. “Mechano-electrochemical interaction for pipeline corrosion: A review.” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 1 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.01.002.
Zheng, J., C. Wang, Y. Liang, Q. Liao, Z. Li, and B. Wang. 2022. “Deeppipe: A deep-learning method for anomaly detection of multi-product pipelines.” Energy 259 (Jun): 125025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125025.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 30, 2023
Accepted: Mar 2, 2023
Published online: Apr 28, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Lei Xu, Pengfei Yu, Shaomu Wen, Yongfan Tang, Yunfu Wang, Yuan Tian, Ting Mao, Changjun Li, Visualization and Analysis of Oil and Gas Pipeline Corrosion Research: A Bibliometric Data-Mining Approach, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1605, 15, 3, (2024).
- Yufeng Yang, Qiang Zhang, Xixiang Zhang, Shuyi Xie, Gang Wu, Lifeng Li, Intelligent Methods for Pipeline Operation and Integrity, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1490, 15, 1, (2023).