Technical Papers
Apr 13, 2018

Rutting-Resistance Investigation of Alternative Polymerized Asphalt Mixtures

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 6

Abstract

Polymers have been incorporated into asphalt as a way to mitigate permanent deformation at high performance temperatures for many years. There are several types of polymers used in asphalt binders to improve the rheological and engineering properties of asphalt mixtures, including styrene butadiene styrene (SBS), ground tire rubber, styrene butadiene rubber, ethylene vinyl acetate, and polyethylene. SBS is the most popular polymer used in high-traffic pavement compared with other polymer modifiers. However, recent studies have shown that mixtures containing some other modifiers are cost-effective and perform as well as or better than SBS-modified binders in some cases. The experimental design in this study included one base binder, PG 64-22; two aggregate sources; SBS and five other modifiers; and three antistripping additives (ASAs). Asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) and Hamburg wheel tracker (HWT) were used to investigate the rut resistances of these alternative modified-asphalt mixtures. It was found that the APA and HWT rut depths of all alternative modified mixtures met the requirements of rut resistance, and these values were typically located in the range of 1–3 mm regardless of polymer type, ASA type, and aggregate source. The ASAs used in this study were effective and did not display significant differences in rut-resistance values from various polymerized mixtures. Simple logarithmic formulas for HWT rut depth during the loading process and the normal distributions of rut depths were developed in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2007. “Determining rutting susceptibility of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA).” AASHTO TP63, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. 2016. “Standard method of test for hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA).” AASHTO T324, Washington, DC.
Adedeji, A., T. Grunfelder, F. S. Bates, C. W. Macosko, M. Stroup-Gardiner, and D. E. Newcomb. 1996. “Asphalt modified by SBS triblock copolymer structure and properties.” Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (12): 1707–1723.
Amirkhanian, S., F. Xiao, and D. Herndon. 2014. The evaluation and specification development of alternative modified asphalt binders in South Carolina. Columbia, South Carolina: South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Aschenbrener, T. 1995. “Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device to predict moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1492: 193–201.
Becker, Y., M. P. Mendez, and Y. Rodriguez. 2001. “Polymer modified asphalt.” Vision Technol. 9 (1): 39–50.
Casola, J. 2006. “Modified asphalt market 2005–2006.” In Proc., Association of Modified Asphalt Producers Meeting. Avon, OH: The Association of Modified Asphalt Producers.
Fini, E. H., E. W. Kalberer, A. Shahbazi, M. Basti, Z. You, H. Ozer, and Q. Aurangzeb. (2011). “Chemical characterization of biobinder from swine manure: Sustainable modifier for asphalt binder.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (11): 1506–1513.
Imaninasab, R. 2016. “Rutting resistance and resilient modulus evaluation of polymer-modified SMA mixtures.” Pet. Sci. Technol. 34 (16): 1483–1489.
Kandhal, P. S., and L. A. Cooley. 2003. Accelerated laboratory rutting tests: Evaluation of the asphalt pavement analyzer. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kanitpong, K., and H. Bahia. 2005. “Relating adhesion and cohesion of asphalts to the effect of moisture on laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1901: 33–43.
Liu, G., E. Nielsen, J. Komacka, G. Leegwater, and M. Van de Ven. 2015. “Influence of soft bitumens on the chemical and rheological properties of reclaimed polymer-modified binders from the ‘old’ surface-layer asphalt.” Constr. Build. Mater. 79: 129–135.
Liu, L., F. Xiao, H. Zhang, and S. Amirkhanian. 2017. “Rheological characteristics of alternative modified binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 144: 442–450.
Maupin, G. W., and D. W. Mokarem. 2006. Investigation of proposed AASHTO rut test procedure using the asphalt pavement analyzer. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Portugal, A. C. X., L. C. D. F. L. Lucena, A. E. D. F. L. Lucena, D. B. Costa, and K. A. de Lima. 2017. “Rheological properties of asphalt binders prepared with maize oil.” Constr. Build. Mater. 152: 1015–1026.
Qi, X., P. E. Sebaaly, and J. A. Epps. 1995. “Evaluation of polymer-modified asphalt concrete mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 7 (2): 117–124.
Rahman, F., and M. Hossain. 2014. Review and analysis of Hamburg wheel tracking device test data. Topeka, KS: Kansas Dept. of Transportation.
Sengoz, B., and B. Isikyakar. 2008. “Analysis of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified bitumen using fluorescent microscopy and conventional test methods.” J. Hazard. Mater. 150 (2): 424–432.
Souliman, M. I., M. Mamlouk, and A. Eifert. 2016. “Cost-effectiveness of rubber and polymer modified asphalt mixtures as related to sustainable fatigue performance.” Procedia Eng. 145: 404–411.
Tarefder, R., and S. Yousefi. 2015. “Rheological examination of aging in polymer modified asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (2): 04015112.
Timm, H. D., R. Powell, J. R. Willis, and R. Kluttz. 2012. “Pavement rehabilitation using high polymer asphalt mix.” In Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wen, H., S. Bhusal, and B. Wen. 2013. “Laboratory evaluation of waste cooking oil-based bioasphalt as an alternative binder for hot mix asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (10): 1432–1437.
Xiao, F., S. Amirkhanian, H. Wang, and P. Hao. 2014. “Rheological property investigations for polymer and polyphosphoric acid modified asphalt binders at high temperatures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 64: 316–323.
Xiao, F., S. N. Amirkhanian, and Z. Luo. 2016. “Performance properties of alternative polymerized asphalt mixtures containing various antistripping additives.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (8): 04016050.
Xiao, F. P., S. N. Amirkhanian, and C. H. Juang. 2007. “Rutting resistance of rubberized asphalt concrete pavements containing reclaimed asphalt pavement mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (6): 475–483.
Yan, Y., S. Chun, R. Roque, and S. Kim. 2016. “Effects of alternative polymer modifications on cracking performance of asphalt binders and resultant mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 121: 569–575.
Yildirim, Y. 2007. “Polymer modified asphalt binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (1): 66–72.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30Issue 6June 2018

History

Received: Dec 1, 2015
Accepted: Dec 5, 2017
Published online: Apr 13, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Feipeng Xiao, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ruoyu Li
Graduate Research Assistant, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China.
Serji Amirkhanian
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.
Jie Yuan
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 201804, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share