Effects of Aggregate Size on the Rutting and Stripping Resistance of Recycled Asphalt Mixtures
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 2
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to examine the effect of the nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) on the rutting and stripping performance of Georgia asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) mixtures using the Hamburg wheel-tracking device (HWTD). Five NMASs of 25, 19, 12.5, 9.5, and 4.75 mm of Superpave mixtures were investigated at three test temperatures of 50, 64, and 70°C. The test results were analyzed in terms of five indexes of rutting and stripping resistance: (1) number of loading passes at failure (), (2) rut depth at 20,000 wheel passes, (3) stripping inflection point (SIP), (4) creep slope (CS), and (5) stripping slope (SS). The results indicated that Superpave mixtures containing RAP with large NMAS performed better than those with small NMAS in both rut and antistripping resistance. The relationships between the NMAS and SIP showed high correlation coefficients of more than than 0.86 at 64°C. The test temperatures of 64 and 70°C are appropriate for distinguishing size effect for the mixtures with regard to the three parameters of the number of wheel pass at selected rut depth, SIP, and CS.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank GDOT for its financial support to this research project. Special thanks are extended to Dr. Peter Wu and Ms. Sheila Hines from GDOT for their technical advisement.
References
AASHTO. (2014). “Standard method of test for percent air voids in compacted dense and open asphalt mixtures.” AASHTO T269, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010). “Standard practice for mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt (HMA).” AASHTO R30, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012). “Standard method of test for theoretical maximum specific gravity () and density of hot mix asphalt (HMA).” AASHTO T209, Washington, DC.
Ahlrich, R. C. (1996). “Influence of aggregate gradation and particle shape/texture on permanent deformation of hot mix asphalt pavements.”, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Aschenbrener, T. (1995). “Evaluation of Hamburg wheel tracking device to predict moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1492, 193–201.
Aschenbrener, T., and Far, N. (1994). “Short-term aging of hot mix asphalt.”, Colorado Dept. of Transportation, Denver.
Asphalt Institute. (1995). “Mix design method for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types (MS-2).” Lexington, KY.
ASTM. (2015a). “Standard test method for recovery of asphalt from solution by Abson method.” ASTM D1856-09, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2015b). “Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate.” ASTM C127, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2015c). “Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate.” ASTM C128, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test method for resistance to degradation of large-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine.” ASTM C131/131M-14, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bassett, C. E. (1990). “Effects of maximum aggregate size on rutting potential and other properties of asphalt-aggregate mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1259, 107–119.
Brown, E. R., and Bassett, C. E. (1989). “The effects of maximum aggregates size on properties of asphalt aggregate mixes.”, Highway Research Center, Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL.
Button, J. W., Perdomo, D., and Lytton, R. L. (1990). “Influence of aggregate on rutting in asphalt concrete pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1259, 141–152.
Chen, J., Huang, B., and Shu, X. (2013). “Air-void distribution analysis of asphalt mixture using discrete element method.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 1375–1385.
Chen, J., and Liao, M. (2002). “Evaluation of internal resistance in hot mix asphalt (HMA) concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater., 16(6), 313–319.
Choubane, B., Page, G. C., and Musselman, J. A. (1998). “Investigation of the suitability of the asphalt pavement analyzer for predicting pavement rutting.”, State Materials Office, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Gainesville, FL.
Choubane, B., Page, G. C., Musselman, J. A., Perdomo, D., and Lytton, R. L. (2000). “Suitability of asphalt pavement analyzer for predicting pavement rutting.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1723, 107–115.
Cooley, L. A., Jr., Kandhal, P. S., Buchanan, M. S., Fee, F., and Epps, A. (2000). “Loaded wheel testers in the United States: State of the practice.”, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL.
GDOT (Georgia Department of Transportation). (2014). “Control of superpave bituminous mixture design—Appendix C, method of calculating batch weights for mix designs with recycled asphalt.”, Office of Materials and Testing, Georgia Dept. of Transportation, Atlanta.
Harrigan, E. T. (2014). “Precision estimates of AASHTO T 324, ‘Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA).’”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Izzo, R. P., and Tahmoressi, M. (1998). “Evaluation of the use of Hamburg wheel-tracking device for moisture susceptibility of hot mix asphalt.”, Texas Dept. of Transportation Branch, Materials and Tests Section, Construction Division, Austin, TX.
Izzo, R. P., and Tahmoressi, M. (1999). “Use of the Hamburg wheel-tracking device for evaluating moisture susceptibility of hot-mix asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1681, 76–85.
Kandhal, P. S., and Cooley, A., Jr. (2003). “Accelerated laboratory rutting tests: Evaluation of the asphalt pavement analyzer.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Kim, S., Shen, J., and Myung Jeong, M. (2017) “Evaluation of aggregate sizes on performance of Georgia asphalt mixture evaluated by hamburg wheel tracking device.” TRB 96th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Lundy, J. R., and Sandoval-Gil, J. A. (2004). “Permanent deformation characteristics of Oregon mixes using the asphalt pavement analyzer.”, Oregon Dept. of Transportation Unit and Federal Highway Administration, Salem, OR.
McDaniel, R., and Anderson, R. M. (2001). “Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method: Technician’s manual.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Rahman, F., and Hossain, M. (2014). “Review and analysis of hamburg wheel tracking device test data.”, Kansas Dept. of Transportation, Transportation Center, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D., and Kennedy, T. W. (1998). Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction, National Asphalt Pavement Association Education Foundation, Lanhan, MD.
Shen, J., Amirhanian, S., and Miller, J. A. (2007) “Effects of rejuvenating agents on superpave mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 376–384.
Shen, J., Kim, S., and Myung Jeong, M. (2017) “Evaluation of Georgia asphalt mixture properties using a hamburg wheel tracking device.”, Georgia Dept. of Transportation, Georgia Southern Univ., Atlanta.
Skok, E., Johnson, E., and Turk, A. (2002). “Asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) evaluation.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
Walubita, L. F., et al. (2012). “Hot-mix asphalt permanent deformation evaluated by Hamburg wheel tracking, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2296, 46–56.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 16, 2016
Accepted: Jul 19, 2017
Published online: Nov 29, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 29, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.