Technical Papers
Mar 15, 2012

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Alternative Reinforcement Materials for Bridge Superstructures Considering Cost and Maintenance Uncertainties

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

A life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was conducted on prestressed concrete bridge superstructures using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars and strands. Traditional reinforcement materials of uncoated steel with cathodic protection and epoxy-coated steel were also considered for comparison. A series of deterministic LCCAs were first conducted to identify a range of expected cost outcomes for different bridge spans and traffic volumes. Then, a probabilistic LCCA was conducted on selected structures that included activity timing and cost random variables. It was found that although more expensive initially, the use of CFRP reinforcement has the potential to achieve significant reductions in life-cycle cost, having a 95% probability to be the least expensive alternative beginning at year 23–77 after initial construction, depending on the bridge case considered. In terms of life-cycle cost, the most effective use of CFRP reinforcement was found to be for an AASHTO beam bridge in a high traffic volume area.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, 2nd Ed., Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2007). LRFD bridge design specifications, 4th Ed., Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2009). LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GRFP-reinforced concrete bridge decks and traffic railings, Washington, D.C.
Advanced Composite Cable Club (ACC). (2002). Rep. of Study Group on Application of Life Cycle, Cost, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
American Automobile Association. (2008). Your driving costs, AAA Association Communication Brochure, Heathrow, FL.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2004). “Prestressing concrete structures with FRP tendons.” ACI 440.4 R-04, Farmington Hills, MI.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2006). “Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI 440.1 R-06, Farmington Hills, MI.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.”ACI 318-08, Farmington Hills, MI.
Bhaskaran, R., Palaniswamy, N., and Rengaswamy, N. S. (2006). “Life-cycle cost analysis of a concrete road bridge across open sea.” Mater. Perform.MTPFBI, 45(10), 51–55.
Burati, J. L., Weed, R. M., Hughes, C. S., and Hill, H. S. (1995). “Optimal procedures for quality assurance specifications.” Rep. FHWA-RD-02-095, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA
Chandler, R. F. (2004). “Life-cycle cost model for evaluating the sustainability of bridge decks.” Rep. No. CSS04-06, Center for Sustainable Systems, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Daigle, L., and Lounis, Z. (2006). “Life cycle cost analysis of high performance concrete bridges considering their environmental impacts.” NRCC-48696, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Ehlen, M. A. (1999). “Life-cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng.JMCEE7, 11(3), 224–230.
Ehlen, M. A., and Marshall, H. E. (1996). The economics of new-technology materials: A case study of FRP bridge decking, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD.
Fagen, M. E., and Phares, B. M. (2000). “Life cycle cost analysis of a low volume road bridge alternative.” Transportation Research Record 1696, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 8–13, 20001.
Fam, A. Z., Rizkalla, S. H., and Tadros, G. (1997). “Behavior of CFRP for prestressing and shear reinforcements of concrete highway bridges.” Struct. J.ASTJEG, 94(1), 77–86.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2001). “Long term effectiveness of cathodic protection systems on highway structures.” Publication No. FHWA-RD-01-096, McLean, VA.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). Life-cycle cost analysis primer, Office of Asset Management, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2005). “Crash cost estimates by maximum police-reported injury severity within selected crash geometries.” FHWA-HRT-05-051, U.S. DOT, Washington D.C.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng.JCCEE5, 15(1), 27–34.
Furuta, H., Koyama, K., and Frangopol, D. M. (2007). “Life-cycle performance and cost analysis of bridge network considering seismic risk.” Proc., 13th IFIP WG 7.5 Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems: Assessment, Design and Life-Cycle Performance, Taylor & Francis, London, 15–26.
Gervasio, H., and da Silva, L., S. (2008). “Comparative life-cycle analysis of steel-concrete composite bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 4(4), 251–269.
Hastak, M., Mirmiran, A., and Richard, D. (2003). “A framework for life-cycle cost assessment of composites in construction.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos.JRPCDW, 22(15), 1409–1430.
Hegazy, T., Elbeltagi, E., and El-Behairy, H. (2004). “Bridge deck management system with integrated life-cycle cost optimization.” Transportation Research Record 1866, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 44–50, 20001.
Huang, Y., Adams, T. M., and Pincheira, J. A. (2004). “Analysis of life-cycle maintenance strategies for concrete bridge decks.” J. Bridge Eng., 9(3), 250–258.JBENF2
Jensen, E., Grace, N., Eamon, C. D., Shi, X., and Matsagar, V. (2009). “Life cycle cost analysis of CFRP reinforced concrete bridges.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
Kaito, K., Abe, M., Koide, Y., and Fujino, Y. (2001). “Bridge management strategy for a steel plate girder bridge based on minimum total life cycle cost.” Proc. SPIEPSISDG, 4337, 194–202.
Kendall, A., Keoleian, G. A., and Helfand, G. E. (2008). “Integrated life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis model for concrete bridge deck applications.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 14(3), 214–222.
Meiarashi, S., Nishizaki, I., and Kishima, T. (2002). “Life-cycle cost of all-composite suspension bridge.” J. Compos. Constr.JCCOF2, 6(4), 206–214.
Michigan DOT. (2010). Traffic monitoring information system (TMIS) of MDOT, 〈http://apps.michigan. gov/tmis/〉.
Michigan DOT. (MDOT). (2001). Michigan design manual, bridge design, Lansing, MI.
Michigan DOT. (MDOT). (2003). Michigan design manual, bridge design, Lansing, MI.
Michigan DOT. (MDOT). (2006). “Hours and cost estimate.” Metro region FY 2006 bridge project scoping job summary, Lansing, MI.
Michigan DOT. (MDOT). (2008). Bridge repair cost estimate, Lansing, MI.
Mohammadi, J., Guralnick, S. A., and Yan, L. (1995). “Incorporating life-cycle costs in highway-bridge planning and design.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 121(5), 417–424.
Nishizaki, Itaru, Takeda, Nobufumi, Ishizuka, Yoshio, Shimomura, Takumi (2006). “A case study of life cycle cost based on a real FRP bridge.” 3rd Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civ. Eng., 〈http://www.pwri.go.jp/eng/activity/pdf/reports/nishizaki.061211.pdf〉 (Mar. 8, 2012).
Nystrom, H. E., Watkins, S. E., Nanni, A., and Murray, S. (2003). “Financial viability of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridges.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 19(1), 2–8.
Praticò, F., Saride, S., and Puppala, A. (2011). “Comprehensive life-cycle cost analysis for selection of stabilization alternatives for better performance of low-volume roads.” Transportation Research Record 2204, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 120–129, 20001.
Rafig, M. I., Chryssanthopolus, M., and Onoufriou, T. (2005). “Comparison of Bridge Management Strategies Using Life-Cycle Cost Analysis.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Bridge Manage., Thomas Telford Publishing, London, 578–586.
Saito, M., Kumares, C. S., and Anderson, V. L. (1988). “Bridge replacement cost analysis.” Transportation Research Record 1180, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 19–24, 20001.
Skitmore, M., and Ng, T. (2002). “Analytical and approximate variance of total project cost.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 456–460.
Smith, Jeffrey L., and Virmani, Paul Y. (1996). “Performance of epoxy-coated rebars in bridge decks.” Public RoadsPUROAQ, 60(2).
Sobanjo, J. O., and Thompson, P. D. (2001). Development of agency maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) cost data for Florida’s bridge management system, Univ. of Florida Rep. to FDOT, Gainesville FL.
Thoft-Christensen, P. (2009). “Life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) analysis of bridges from a user and social point of view.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 5(1), 49–57.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual 2000, Washington, D.C.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2003). “Bridge life-cycle cost analysis.” NCHRP Rep. 483, Washington, D.C.
U.S. DOT. (1997). Memorandum: The value of saving travel time: Departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations, Washington, D.C.
U.S. DOT, Analysis Division. (2002). 2000 work zone traffic crash facts, Washington, D.C.
U.S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Highway statistics 2007: Annual vehicle distance traveled in miles and related Data—2007 by highway category and vehicle type, Washington, D.C.
Val, D. V. (2007). “Factors affecting life-cycle cost analysis of RC structures in chloride contaminated environments.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 13(2), 135–143.
Vu, K. A. T., and Stewart, M. G. (2005). “Predicting the likelihood and extent of reinforced concrete corrosion-induced cracking.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 131(11), 1681–1689.
Weed, R. M. (2001). “Derivation of equation for cost of premature pavement failure.” Transportation Research Record 1761, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 93–96.
Weyers, R., and Goodwin, F. E. (1999). “Life-cycle cost analysis for zinc and other protective coatings for steel structures.” Transportation Research Record 1680, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 63–73, 20001.
Won, Jong-Pil, Park, Chan-Gi, and Jang, Chang-Il. (2007). “Tensile facture and bond properties of ductile hybrid FRP reinforcing bars.” Polym. Polym. Compos., 15(1), 9–16.
Zayed, T., Chang, L-M., and Fricker, J. D. (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis using deterministic and stochastic methods: Conflicting results.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil.JPCFEV, 16(2), 63–74.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24Issue 4April 2012
Pages: 373 - 380

History

Received: Nov 1, 2010
Accepted: Sep 25, 2011
Published online: Mar 15, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher D. Eamon, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ., Detroit, MI 48202 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Elin A. Jensen, M.ASCE
Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Lawrence Technological Univ., Southfield, MI 48075.
Nabil F. Grace, F.ASCE
Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ., Southfield, MI 48075.
Xiuwei Shi
Graduate Student, Civil Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ., Southfield, MI 48075.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share