Abstract

When critical infrastructure system services are disrupted, households typically respond by reducing, delaying, or relocating their demand (e.g., delaying laundry), or augmenting supply (e.g., using a generator). While this phenomenon is well known, there has been little systematic empirical investigation of it. Focusing on electric power and water service interruptions and using revealed and stated preference survey data from Los Angeles County, California, we develop 24 mixed logit models, one each to predict the probability an individual undertakes a specified adaptation as a function of outage duration and characteristics of the individual. The analysis aims to determine: (1) how common different household adaptations are; (2) how adaptation implementation varies with infrastructure type, outage duration, and uses of the service; (3) what household characteristics are associated with implementation of different adaptations; and (4) how adaptations tend to occur together. The percentage of individuals who report doing an adaptation varies greatly across adaptations and outage durations, from 2% to 88%. In general, adaptations that require moving out of the home are the least common of those investigated. For electric power outages, adaptations that could be done at home are less likely as the outage duration increases, while those that require going somewhere are more likely as the duration increases. For water outages, all adaptations (except delaying consumption) are more likely as an outage lasts longer. Using electric power or water for medical devices and/or work and business has a large effect on the likelihood of implementing many adaptations. Preevent conservation habits are also associated with an increased likelihood of implementing adaptations. The influence of household characteristics varies greatly across adaptations. There is evidence that some adaptations tend to occur together (e.g., using water from lakes and the government) and others tend not to (e.g., delaying electricity use and going to a hotel).

Practical Applications

Knowing what kinds of adaptations are found among different segments of the population, how common they are, and when they are likely to be implemented can help policymakers know what sorts of crisis-coping behaviors to expect in their locality, and can help them to know the timeframe in which those adaptations would be implemented. This in turn can provide needed knowledge for how to support those adaptations. Such support could take the form of enhanced contacts and outreach in specific populations (e.g., medically fragile), advance planning (having materials on hand, or including adaptations in drills or exercises), or timely improvising as an event unfolds.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All survey data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Science Foundation for financial support of this research under Award No. CMMI-1735483.

References

Abi Ghanem, D., S. Mander, and C. Gough. 2016. “‘I think we need to get a better generator’: Household resilience to disruption to power supply during storm events.” Energy Policy 92 (12): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.003.
Aliloedin, W. W. 2014. “Climate challenge and water scarcity adaptation strategies in the Area of Pacitan, Indonesia.” Doctoral dissertation, Institut fur Geographie, Giessen Univ.
Bhat, C. R., and S. Castelar. 2002. “A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 36 (7): 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00020-0.
Bourque, L. B., R. Regan, M. M. Kelley, M. M. Wood, M. Kano, and D. S. Mileti. 2013. “An examination of the effect of perceived risk on preparedness behavior.” Environ. Behav. 45 (5): 615–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512437596.
Chakalian, P., L. C. Kurtz, and D. M. Hondula. 2018. “Understanding vulnerability and adaptive capacity to large-scale power failure in the United States.” Accessed October 6, 2021. https://hazards.colorado.edu/quick-response-report/understanding-vulnerability-and-adaptive-capacity-to-large-scale-power-failure-in-the-united-states.
Clay, L. A., J. B. Goetschius, M. A. Papas, J. Trainor, N. Martins, and J. M. Kendra. 2020. “Does preparedness matter? The influence of household preparedness on disaster outcomes during Superstorm Sandy.” Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 14 (1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.78.
Dargin, J. S., and A. Mostafavi. 2020. “Human-centric infrastructure resilience: Uncovering well-being risk disparity due to infrastructure disruptions in disasters.” PLoS One 15 (6): e0234381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234381.
Eakin, H., A. M. Lerner, D. Manuel-Navarrete, B. H. Aguilar, A. Martínez-Canedo, B. Tellman, L. Charli-Joseph, R. Fernández-Álvarez, and L. Bojórquez-Tapia. 2016. “Adapting to risk and perpetuating poverty: Household’s strategies for managing flood risk and water scarcity in Mexico City.” Environ. Sci. Policy 66 (3): 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.006.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2013. “Build a kit.” Accessed July 28, 2021. https://www.ready.gov/kit.
Hahsler, M., B. Grün, and K. Hornik. 2005. “arules—A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets.” J. Stat. Software 14 (15): 18637. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i15.
Heidenstrøm, N., and L. Kvarnlöf. 2017. “Coping with blackouts: A practice theory approach to household preparedness.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 26 (2): 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12191.
Heidenstrøm, N., and H. Throne-Holst. 2020. “‘Someone will take care of it’. Households’ understanding of their responsibility to prepare for and cope with electricity and ICT infrastructure breakdowns.” Energy Policy 144 (23): 111676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111676.
Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene. 2008. “Combining RP and SP data: Biases in using the nested logit ‘trick’—Contrasts with flexible mixed logit incorporating panel and scale effects.” J. Transp. Geogr. 16 (2): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.07.001.
Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene. 2015. Applied choice analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Klinger, C., O. Landeg, and V. Murray. 2014. “Power outages, extreme events and health: A systematic review of the literature from 2011-2012.” PLoS Curr. 6 (2): 1371. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.04eb1dc5e73dd1377e05a10e9edde673.
Lavasani, M., M. Hossan, H. Asgari, and X. Jin. 2017. “Examining methodological issues on combined RP and SP data.” Transp. Res. Procedia 25 (5): 2330–2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.218.
Louviere, J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Martins, V. N., H. M. Louis-Charles, J. Nigg, J. Kendra, and S. Sisco. 2018. “Household disaster preparedness in New York City before Superstorm Sandy: Findings and recommendations.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage. 15 (4): 1515. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2017-0002.
Martins, V. N., J. Nigg, H. M. Louis-Charles, and J. M. Kendra. 2019. “Household preparedness in an imminent disaster threat scenario: The case of Superstorm Sandy in New York City.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 34 (11): 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.003.
Merrin, G. J., J. S. Hong, and D. L. Espelage. 2015. “Are the risk and protective factors similar for gang-involved, pressured-to-join, and non-gang-involved youth? A social-ecological analysis.” Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 85 (6): 522.
Moreno, J., and D. Shaw. 2019. “Community resilience to power outages after disaster: A case study of the 2010 Chile earthquake and tsunami.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 34 (Dec): 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.016.
Palm, J. 2009. “Emergency management in the Swedish Electricity Grid from a household perspective.” J. Contingencies and Crisis Management 17 (1): 55–63.
R Core Team. 2021. “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” Accessed October 6, 2021. https://www.R-project.org.
Sampson, R. J., S. W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. “Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.” Science 277: 918–924.
Sarrias, M., and R. Daziano. 2017. “Multinomial logit models with continuous and discrete individual heterogeneity in R: The GMNL package.” J. Stat. Software 79 (2): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v079.i02.
Scanlon, J. 1999. “Emergent groups in established frameworks: Ottawa Carleton’s response to the 1998 ice disaster.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 7 (1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00096.
Teel, J. n.d. Planning for the most likely power outage. Denver: Agility Recovery Inc.
Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wamsler, C., and E. Brink. 2014. “Interfacing citizens’ and institutions’ practice and responsibilities for climate change adaptation.” Urban Clim. 7 (10): 64–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2013.10.009.
Wang, G. Q., and J. Y. Zhang. 2015. “Variation of water resources in the Huang-huai-hai areas and adaptive strategies to climate change.” Quat. Int. 380–381: 180–186.
Weick, K. E. 1993. “The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster.” Administrative Sci. Q. 38 (4): 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Oct 15, 2021
Accepted: Jun 15, 2022
Published online: Sep 14, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abderrahmane Abbou
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-1466
V. Nuno Martins
Postdoctoral Scholar, Disaster Research Center, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
Professor, Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-5610
Linda K. Nozick
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14850.
Zachary Cox
Ph.D. Student, Disaster Research Center, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
Maggie Leon-Corwin
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Sociology, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74075.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Framework for Transitions in the Built Environment: Insights from Compound Hazards in the COVID-19 Era, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2285, 30, 1, (2024).
  • Household Adaptations to and Impacts from Electric Power and Water Outages in the Texas 2021 Winter Storm, Natural Hazards Review, 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1742, 24, 4, (2023).
  • Infrastructure Resilience Framework, Infrastructure System Resilience, 10.1061/9780784485088.ch2, (7-33), (2023).
  • Searching for signal and borrowing wi-fi: Understanding disaster-related adaptations to telecommunications disruptions through social media, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103548, 86, (103548), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share