Abstract

In February 2021, a winter storm brought snow, ice, and freezing temperatures, which caused severe interruptions in the electric power and water supply systems in Texas and surrounding areas. In this paper, we use survey data to investigate the ways that households adapted and reacted to those outages. The analysis aimed to determine (1) how common different household adaptations were, (2) how adaptations varied with outage and household characteristics, (3) how adaptations tended to occur together, (4) how unhappy households were as a result, (5) how household unhappiness varied with outage and household characteristics, and (6) what concerns influenced the unhappiness level. Results are compared with findings from a study that used an almost identical survey instrument but was based on a larger data set from Los Angeles. Findings from both studies suggest that almost everyone implemented at least one adaptation; most implemented several. They also agreed the most common adaptations were using candles, a flashlight, and/or a lantern; charging the cell phone in the car; purchasing bottled water; and delaying or reducing consumption. Both studies indicate that households experienced varied levels of unhappiness, which were similar for electric power and water interruptions. The reported levels of unhappiness were notably higher in Texas than Los Angeles, however, possibly because the outages had relatively long durations and were recent. Financial, time/effort, health, and stress concerns all were found to have a substantial influence on the extent of unhappiness, in both the Texas and Los Angeles analyses, suggesting that it is critical to consider all of them. Analysis of the Texas study introduced the new finding that repeated service outages during an event is associated with both increased adaptation implementation and greater unhappiness. Analyzing larger data sets from additional events in different locations would be helpful to further understanding of household experiences in service outages.

Practical Applications

Several practical applications emerge from this work. First, by knowing how people are likely to adapt, officials can better prepare to support their constituents during a crisis. Anticipating the distribution of unhappiness could point infrastructure operators to consider other measures for service quality besides downtime alone, as important as that is. Knowing the differential effects of outages on different populations can improve officials’ understanding of social vulnerabilities in their communities, which is needed for planning, education, and outreach. Electric and water outages accompany many kinds of hazard events; the extent to which a local population can adapt, and how officials and infrastructure operators can enhance those adaptations, will be important elements of local community resilience.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All survey data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Science Foundation for financial support of this research under Award CMMI-1735483.

References

Abbou, A., R. Davidson, J. Kendra, V. Martins, B. Ewing, L. Nozick, Z. Cox, and M. Leon-Corwin. 2022. “Household adaptations to infrastructure system service interruptions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 28 (4): 04022036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000715.
Archer, K., D. Hedeker, R. Nordgren, and R. Gibbons. 2015. “Mixor: An R package for longitudinal and clustered ordinal response modeling. R package version 1.0.4.” Accessed July 31, 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mixor.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2016. Critical assessment of lifeline system performance: Understanding societal needs in disaster recovery. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Clay, L. A., J. B. Goetschius, M. A. Papas, J. Trainor, N. Martins, and J. M. Kendra. 2020. “Does preparedness matter? The influence of household preparedness on disaster outcomes during superstorm sandy.” Disaster Med. Public Health Preparedness 14 (1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.78.
Coleman, N., A. Esmalian, and A. Mostafavi. 2020. “Equitable resilience in infrastructure systems: Empirical assessment of disparities in hardship experiences of vulnerable populations during service disruptions.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (4): 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000401.
Dargin, J. S., and A. Mostafavi. 2020. “Human-centric infrastructure resilience: Uncovering well-being risk disparity due to infrastructure disruptions in disasters.” PLoS One 15 (6): e0234381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234381.
Davidson, R. A., J. Kendra, B. Ewing, L. K. Nozick, K. Starbird, Z. Cox, and M. Leon-Corwin. 2022. “Managing disaster risk associated with critical infrastructure systems: A system-level conceptual framework for research and policy guidance.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 39 (2): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2022.2067848.
DeYoung, S. E., J. N. Sutton, A. K. Farmer, D. Neal, and K. A. Nichols. 2019. “‘Death was not in the agenda for the day’: Emotions, behavioral reactions, and perceptions in response to the 2018 Hawaii wireless emergency alert.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 36 (May): 101078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101078.
Ercumen, A., B. F. Arnold, E. Kumpel, Z. Burt, I. Ray, K. Nelson, and J. M. Colford Jr. 2015. “Upgrading a piped water supply from intermittent to continuous delivery and association with waterborne illness: A matched cohort study in urban India.” PLoS Med. 12 (10): e1001892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001892.
Esmalian, A., M. Ramaswamy, K. Rasoulkhani, and A. Mostafavi. 2019. “Agent-based modeling framework for simulation of societal impacts of infrastructure service disruptions during disasters.” In Proc., Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience, 16–23. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482445.003.
Farmer, A., and S. DeYoung. 2019. “The pets of Hurricane Matthew: Evacuation and sheltering with companion animals.” Anthrozoös 32 (3): 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1598661.
FEMA. 2013. “Build a kit.” Accessed July 28, 2021. http://www.ready.gov/build-a-kit.
Hahsler, M., B. Grün, and K. Hornik. 2005. “arules—A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets.” J. Stat. Software 14 (Sep): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i15.
Harrell, F. 2015. Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Berlin: Springer.
Hedeker, D., and R. Gibbons. 1996. “MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis.” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 49 (2): 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(96)01720-8.
Heidenstrøm, N., and L. Kvarnlöf. 2018. “Coping with blackouts: A practice theory approach to household preparedness.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 26 (2): 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12191.
Heidenstrøm, N., and H. Throne-Holst. 2020. “‘Someone will take care of it’. Households’ understanding of their responsibility to prepare for and cope with electricity and ICT infrastructure breakdowns.” Energy Policy 144 (Sep): 111676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111676.
Jeandron, A., J. M. Saidi, A. Kapama, M. Burhole, F. Birembano, T. Vandevelde, A. Gasparrini, B. Armstrong, S. Cairncross, and J. H. Ensink. 2015. “Water supply interruptions and suspected cholera incidence: A time-series regression in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.” PLoS Med. 12 (10): e1001893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001893.
Klinger, C., O. Landeg, and V. Murray. 2014. “Power outages, extreme events and health: A systematic review of the literature from 2011–2012.” PLoS Curr. 6 (Jan). https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.04eb1dc5e73dd1377e05a10e9edde673.
Martins, V., H. Louis-Charles, J. Nigg, J. Kendra, and S. Sisco. 2018. “Household disaster preparedness in New York City before Superstorm Sandy: Findings and recommendations.” J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage. 15 (4): 201. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2017-0002.
Merrin, G. J., J. S. Hong, and D. L. Espelage. 2015. “Are the risk and protective factors similar for gang-involved, pressured-to-join, and non-gang-involved youth? A social-ecological analysis.” Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 85 (6): 522. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000094.
Mongold, E., R. Davidson, J. Trivedi, S. DeYoung, T. Wachtendorf, and P. Anyidoho. 2021. “Hurricane evacuation beliefs and behaviour of inland vs. coastal populations.” Environ. Hazards 20 (4): 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1829531.
Moreno, J., and D. Shaw. 2019. “Community resilience to power outages after disaster: A case study of the 2010 Chile earthquake and tsunami.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 34 (Mar): 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.016.
NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) Consultants Joint Venture. 2014. Earthquake-resilient lifelines: NEHRP research, development and implementation roadmap. Redwood City, CA: NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture.
Osberghaus, D., and T. Abeling. 2022. “Heat vulnerability and adaptation of low-income households in Germany.” Global Environ. Change 72 (Jan): 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102446.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sampson, R. J., S. W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. “Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.” Science 277 (5328): 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918.
Soleimani, N. 2022. “Develop a probabilistic scenario-based model of the risk of multiple infrastructure systems to earthquakes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware.
Stock, A., R. Davidson, J. Kendra, V. Martins, B. Ewing, L. Nozick, K. Starbird, and M. Leon-Corwin. 2023. “Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services.” Nat. Hazards 115 (3): 2279–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05638-8.
Tabandeh, A., P. Gardoni, and C. Murphy. 2018. “A reliability- based capability approach.” Risk Anal. 38 (2): 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12843.
Tabandeh, A., P. Gardoni, C. Murphy, and N. Myers. 2019. “Societal risk and resilience analysis: Dynamic Bayesian network formulation of a capability approach.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 5 (1): 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000996.
US Census Bureau. 2019. “ACS demographic and housing estimates, DP05. American community survey.” Accessed October 20, 2021. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/.
van Buuren, S. 2012. Flexible imputation of missing data. Interdisciplinary statistics series. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
van Buuren, S., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn. 2011. “mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R.” J. Stat. Software 45 (3): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
Wolf, J., W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, V. Abrahamson, and R. Raine. 2010. “Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: An empirical study of two UK cities.” Global Environ. Change 20 (1): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.09.004.
Yang, Y., H. Tatano, Q. Huang, H. Liu, G. Yoshizawa, and K. Wang. 2021. “Evaluating the societal impact of disaster-driven infrastructure disruptions: A water analysis perspective.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 52 (Jan): 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101988.
Zhang, F. 2019. In the dark: How much do power sector distortions cost south Asia? Washington, DC: World Bank.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 24Issue 4November 2023

History

Received: Aug 17, 2022
Accepted: May 23, 2023
Published online: Jul 27, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Nafiseh Soleimani [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Biden School of Public Policy and Administration, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-1466. Email: [email protected]
Bradley Ewing [email protected]
Professor, Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409. Email: [email protected]
Linda K. Nozick [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share