Technical Papers
Mar 14, 2022

Feasibility of a Surface-Based Controlled Source Electromagnetic Method for Detection of Buried Pipelines and Corrosion Effects

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

The controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) geophysical method is used for a number of purposes, including exploration and characterization of oil and geothermal deposits. Here, based on idealized modeling scenarios, we explore an adaptation of the method to remotely inspect shallow buried pipelines and determine its suitability for monitoring corrosion because of the sensitivity of CSEM responses to electrical conductivity contrasts within the subsurface. We show that the electric field response from an in-line transmitter-receiver configuration provides more diagnostic information than the broadside configuration while both are likely to detect the pipeline response in the presence of ambient noise. The presence of a conductive pipeline is considerably easier to detect in sandy soils than in clays and there is a reduction in amplitude and response shape when the pipeline is resistive. In-line responses can diagnose the level of corrosion, although it is difficult to distinguish between a highly corroded pipeline and one with a break. In cases where a pipeline break is present, some data processing may be required to precisely locate the break.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All software used to develop the results and figures shown in this paper is available at no charge from the first author upon request.

References

Badea, E. A., M. E. Everett, G. A. Newman, and O. Biro. 2001. “Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using coulomb-gauged potentials.” Geophysics 66 (3): 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444968.
Constable, S. C. 2010. “Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration.” Geophysics 75 (5): 75A67–75A81. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483451.
Constable, S. C., and L. Srnka. 2007. “An introduction to marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration.” Geophysics 72 (2): WA3–WA12. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2432483.
Cuevas, N., and M. Pezzoli. 2018. “On the effect of the metal casing in surface-borehole electromagnetic methods.” Geophysics 83 (3): E173–E187. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0055.1.
Edwards, N. 2005. “Marine controlled source electromagnetics: Principles, methodologies, future commercial applications.” Surv. Geophys. 26 (6): 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-005-1830-3.
Everett, M. E., and A. D. Chave. 2019. “On the physical principles underlying electromagnetic induction.” Geophysics 84 (5): W21–W32. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0232.1.
Fitterman, D. V. 2015. “Tools and techniques: Active-source electromagnetic methods.” In Vol. 11 of Resources in the near-surface earth, treatise on geophysics, edited by L. Slater, 295–333. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Heagy, L., R. Cockett, D. Oldenburg, and M. Wilt. 2015. “Modelling electromagnetic problems in the presence of cased wells.” In Proc., SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 699–703. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Holden, J., T. P. Burt, and M. Vilas. 2002. “Application of ground-penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 27 (3): 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.316.
Jordana, J., M. Gasulla, and R. Pallas-Areny. 2001. “Electrical resistance tomography to detect leaks from buried pipes.” Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 (8): 1061. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/8/311.
Kohnke, C., L. Liu, R. Streich, and A. Swindinsky. 2018. “A method of moments approach to model the electromagnetic response of multiple steel casings in a layered earth.” Geophysics 83 (2): WB81–WB96. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0303.1.
Myer, D., S. Constable, K. Key, M. E. Glinsky, and G. Liu. 2012. “Marine CSEM of the Scarborough gas field, part 1: Experimental design and data uncertainty.” Geophysics 77 (4): E281–E299. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0380.1.
Passalacqua, H. 1983. “Electromagnetic fields due to a thin resistive layer.” Geophys. Prospect. 31 (6): 945–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01099.x.
Puzyrev, V., C. Torres-Verdin, and V. Calo. 2017. “Electromagnetic response prediction for conductive permeable, heterogeneous steel-cased wells.” In Proc., 79th EAGE Conf. and Exhibition. Houten, Netherlands: European Association of Geocientists and Engineers.
Schumacher, C. R. 1987. “Electrodynamic similitude and physical scale modelling of nondispersive targets.” J. Appl. Phys. 62 (7): 2616. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.339848.
Stratton, J. A. 1941. Electromagnetic theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Streich, R. 2016. “Controlled-source electromagnetic approaches for hydrocarbon exploration and monitoring on land.” Surv. Geophys. 37 (1): 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9336-0.
Thiel, S. 2017. “Electromagnetic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing: Relationship to permeability, seismicity and stress.” Surv. Geophys. 38 (5): 1133–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9426-2.
Thiesson, J., A. Tabbagh, M. Dabas, and A. Chevalier. 2017. “Characterization of buried cables and pipes using electromagnetic induction (EMI) loop-loop frequency domain devices.” Geophysics 83 (1): E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0476.1.
Um, E. S., and D. L. Alumbaugh. 2007. “On the physics of the marine controlled-source electromagnetic method.” Geophysics 72 (2): WA13–WA26. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2432482.
Vo, C. K., S. G. H. Staples, D. M. J. Cowell, B. T. H. Varcoe, and S. Freear. 2020. “Determining the depth and location of buried pipeline by magnetometer survey.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (2): 04020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000438.
Wahab, S., D. Chapman, C. Rogers, K. Y. Foo, N. Metje, S. Nawawi, M. Isa, and A. Madun. 2018. “Assessing the condition of buried pipe using ground penetrating radar (GPR).” In Proc., ISPRS—Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 77–81. Hannover, Germany: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W9-77-2018.
Ward, S. H., and G. W. Hohmann. 1987. “Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications.” In Vol. 1 of Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, edited by M. N. Nabighian, 131–311. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Weiss, C. J. 2007. “The fallacy of the ‘shallow-water problem’ in marine CSEM exploration.” Geophysics 72 (6): A93–A97. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2786868.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Jun 8, 2020
Accepted: Jan 12, 2022
Published online: Mar 14, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M Univ., MS 3115, College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-5241. Email: [email protected]
Mark E. Everett [email protected]
Professor and Howard Karren Endowed Professor, Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M Univ., MS 3115, College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share