Technical Papers
Mar 16, 2022

The Other Side of the Interdependency Coin: Identifying Coordination and Investment Opportunities for Infrastructure Systems

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

A vast amount of investment in infrastructure is required to respond to short- and long-term social, technological, and environmental needs and developments. Because infrastructure systems are highly interconnected, much can be gained by considering these interdependencies when planning future investments. However, identifying opportunities that arise from these infrastructure interdependencies has mainly been neglected. So far, the risk perspective has dominated interdependency studies. Alternatively, this paper proposes an agent-based modeling approach supporting infrastructure decision makers (1) to reveal the effects of planned sector-specific investments on the performance of interdependent infrastructures; and (2) to identify situations around which cross-sectoral coordination and collaboration can be shaped. The selected modeling approach treats infrastructure as sociotechnical systems, incorporating sector-driven operational decisions and infrastructure demand changes. They included operational decisions that respond to temporary or longer-term demand-capacity mismatch to account for the flexibility in exploiting available systemwide capacities. This modeling approach results in a more realistic estimation of infrastructure performance and beneficial co-investment opportunities. A regional transportation infrastructure system in the Netherlands is used as a case to demonstrate the approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The project is part of the research program Responsive Innovations funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) and Next Generation Infrastructures (NGInfra). The authors would like to thank the experts of the infrastructure agencies involved in the knowledge institute NGInfra for their contributions to the research.

References

Adelt, F., J. Weyer, and R. D. Fink. 2014. “Governance of complex systems: Results of a sociological simulation experiment.” Ergonomics 57 (3): 434–438.
Almoghathawi, Y., K. Barker, and L. A. Albert. 2019. “Resilience-driven restoration model for interdependent infrastructure networks.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 185 (May): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.006.
Anand, N., D. Meijer, J. Van Duin, L. Tavasszy, and S. Meijer. 2016. “Validation of an agent based model using a participatory simulation gaming approach: The case of city logistics.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 71 (Oct): 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.002.
Blockley, D. 2013. “Do civil engineering systems need systematising? Tackling complexity—Top 10 issues for civil engineering systems.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 30 (3–4): 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2013.865019.
Bloomfield, R. E., P. Popov, K. Salako, V. Stankovic, and D. Wright. 2017. “Preliminary interdependency analysis: An approach to support critical-infrastructure risk-assessment.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (Nov): 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.030.
Bonabeau, E. 2002. “Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems.” Supplement, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (S3): 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899.
Busscher, T., T. Tillema, and J. Arts. 2015. “In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts?” Transp. Policy 42 (Aug): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.007.
Chappin, E. J. L., L. J. de Vries, J. C. Richstein, P. Bhagwat, K. Iychettira, and S. Khan. 2017. “Simulating climate and energy policy with agent-based modelling: The energy modelling laboratory (EMLab).” Environ. Modell. Software 96 (Oct): 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.009.
Crooks, A. T., and A. J. Heppenstall. 2012. “Introduction to agent-based modelling.” In Agent-based models of geographical systems, edited by A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See, and M. Batty, 85–105. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
de Dios Ortuzar, J., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling transport. New York: Wiley.
De Jong, G., A. Burgess, L. Tavasszy, R. Versteegh, M. de Bok, and N. Schmorak. 2011. “Distribution and modal split models for freight transport in The Netherlands.” In Proc., 2011 European Transport Conf., Association for European Transport. On the Generalized Cost-Demand Elasticity of Intermodal Container Transport. Glasgow, UK: Association for European Transport.
DeLaurentis, D. A. 2008. “Understanding transportation as a system of systems problem.” In System of systems engineering: Innovations for the 21st century, 520–541. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dijkema, G. P. J., Z. Lukszo, and M. P. C. Weijnen. 2013. “Introduction.” In Vol. 9 of Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. Agent-based social systems. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Engelen, G., and R. White. 2008. “Validating and calibrating integrated cellular automata based models of land use change.” In The dynamics of complex urban systems, 185–211. Berlin: Springer.
Eusgeld, I., C. Nan, and S. Dietz. 2011. “‘System-of-systems’ approach for interdependent critical infrastructures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (6): 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.010.
Fang, Y., and E. Zio. 2017. “Optimizing the resilience of interdependent infrastructure systems against intentional attacks.” In Proc., 2017 2nd Int. Conf. on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS). New York: IEEE.
Glorioso, A., and A. Servida. 2012. “Infrastructure sectors and the information infrastructure.” In Critical infrastructure protection: Information infrastructure models, analysis, and defense, edited by J. Lopez, R. Setola, and S. D. Wolthusen, 39–51. Berlin: Springer.
Godfrey, P. 2010. “Using systems thinking to learn to deliver sustainable built environments.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 27 (3): 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2010.482656.
Grafius, D. R., L. Varga, and S. Jude. 2020. “Infrastructure interdependencies: Opportunities from complexity.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (4): 04020036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000575.
Hall, J. W., S. Thacker, M. C. Ives, Y. Cao, M. Chaudry, S. P. Blainey, and E. J. Oughton. 2016a. “Strategic analysis of the future of national infrastructure.” In Vol. 170 of Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering, 39–47. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.
Hall, J. W., M. Tran, A. J. Hickford, and R. J. Nicholls. 2016b. The future of national infrastructure: A system-of-systems approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hiteva, R., and J. Watson. 2019. “Governance of interactions between infrastructure sectors: The making of smart grids in the UK.” Environ. Innovation Societal Transitions 32 (Sep): 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.006.
Huang, L., J. Chen, and Q. Zhu. 2018. “Distributed and optimal resilient planning of large-scale interdependent critical infrastructures.” In Proc., 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC). New York: IEEE.
Kammouh, O., M. Nogal, R. Binnekamp, and A. R. Wolfert. 2021. “Multi-system intervention optimization for interdependent infrastructure.” Autom. Constr. 127 (Jul): 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103698.
Koç, A., and D. P. Morton. 2015. “Prioritization via stochastic optimization.” Manage. Sci. 61 (3): 586–603. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1865.
Kraan, O., G. J. Kramer, and I. Nikolic. 2018. “Investment in the future electricity system—An agent-based modelling approach.” Energy 151 (May): 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.092.
Lewis, N. A. 2016. “Infrastructure investment, an engineering perspective.” Eng. Econ. 61 (2): 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1172143.
Liander. 2018. “Eerste deel vervanging Apeldoornse leidingen door Liander en Vitens afgerond.” Accessed July 6, 2020. https://www.liander.nl/nieuws/2018/07/05/eerste-deel-vervanging-apeldoornse-leidingen-door-liander-en-vitens-afgerond.
Ligtenberg, A., R. J. van Lammeren, A. K. Bregt, and A. J. Beulens. 2010. “Validation of an agent-based model for spatial planning: A role-playing approach.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 34 (5): 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.04.005.
Luiijf, E. A. M., and M. H. A. Klaver. 2004. “Protecting a nation’s critical infrastructure: The first steps.” In Proc., 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583). New York: IEEE.
Ma, T., and Y. Nakamori. 2009. “Modeling technological change in energy systems—From optimization to agent-based modeling.” Energy 34 (7): 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.03.005.
Maier, H. R., J. H. Guillaume, H. van Delden, G. A. Riddell, M. Haasnoot, and J. H. Kwakkel. 2016. “An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation: How do they fit together?” Environ. Modell. Software 81 (Jul): 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.014.
Moallemi, E. A., and S. Malekpour. 2018. “A participatory exploratory modelling approach for long-term planning in energy transitions.” Energy Res. Social Sci. 35 (Jan): 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.022.
Moloney, M., K. Fitzgibbon, and E. McKeogh. 2018. “Systems-of-systems methodology for strategic infrastructure decision making: Ireland as a case study.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 34 (3–4): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2018.1447568.
Moss, S. 2008. “Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models.” J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 11 (1): 5.
Nikolic, I., K. H. van Dam, and J. Kasmire. 2013. “Practice.” In Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. Agent-based social systems. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Otto, A., J. W. Hall, A. J. Hickford, R. J. Nicholls, D. Alderson, S. Barr, and M. Tran. 2016. “A quantified system-of-systems modeling framework for robust national infrastructure planning.” IEEE Syst. J. 10 (2): 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2361157.
Ouyang, M. 2014. “Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121 (Jan): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040.
Rinaldi, S. M., J. P. Peerenboom, and T. K. Kelly. 2001. “Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies.” IEEE Control Syst. 21 (6): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131.
Roelich, K., C. Knoeri, J. K. Steinberger, L. Varga, P. T. Blythe, D. Butler, R. Gupta, G. P. Harrison, C. Martin, and P. Purnell. 2015. “Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 92 (Mar): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.008.
Saidi, S., L. Kattan, P. Jayasinghe, P. Hettiaratchi, and J. Taron. 2018. “Integrated infrastructure systems—A review.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 36 (Jan): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.022.
Tavasszya, L., and G. de Jong. 2013. “Introduction.” In Modelling freight transport, edited by L. Tavasszya and G. de Jong, 1–12. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Thacker, S., R. Pant, and J. W. Hall. 2017. “System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (Nov): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.023.
Van Dam, K. H., I. Nikolic, and Z. Lukszo. 2012. Vol. 9 of Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. New York: Springer.
Voinov, A., et al. 2018. “Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job.” Environ. Modell. Software 109 (Nov): 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028.
Voinov, A., N. Kolagani, M. K. McCall, P. D. Glynn, M. E. Kragt, F. O. Ostermann, S. A. Pierce, and P. Ramu. 2016. “Modelling with stakeholders—Next generation.” Environ. Modell. Software 77 (Mar): 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016.
Wu, P. P.-Y., C. Fookes, J. Pitchforth, and K. Mengersen. 2015. “A framework for model integration and holistic modelling of socio-technical systems.” Decis. Support Syst. 71 (Mar): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.006.
Young, K., and J. W. Hall. 2015. “Introducing system interdependency into infrastructure appraisal: From projects to portfolios to pathways.” Infrastruct. Complexity 2 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0005-8.
Zhang, C., J. Kong, and S. P. Simonovic. 2018. “Modeling joint restoration strategies for interdependent infrastructure systems.” PLoS One 13 (4): e0195727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195727.
Zhang, P., and S. Peeta. 2011. “A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 45 (3): 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Sep 23, 2020
Accepted: Dec 14, 2021
Published online: Mar 16, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522 NB, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-8085. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522 NB, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3753-5378
Ellen-Wien P. W. M. Augustijn, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Univ. of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522 NB, Netherlands.
Full Professor, Head of Dept. of Civil Engineering and Management, Univ. of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede 7522 NB, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-4858

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share