Technical Papers
Apr 28, 2021

Long-Term Leaching Behavior of Chromite Ore Processing Residue as Backfill Material and the Propagation of Chromium in the Surrounding Soil

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25, Issue 3

Abstract

Leaching characteristics of chromium ore processing residue (COPR) for the long term (simulating a 20-year leaching scenario) were investigated using laboratory flow-through column testing with synthetic rainwater and groundwater for 250 pore volumes of flow (PVFs). Four saturated column experiments simulated the long-term leaching of chromium (Cr) from two types of COPR [unweathered, gray-black (GB) and weathered, hard-brown (HB)] via advective groundwater and rainwater flow. The release of total [Cr(T)] and hexavalent Cr [Cr(VI)] from GB and HB COPR showed peak concentration before 5.5 PVFs and decreased significantly thereafter. The concentrations of Cr(T) and Cr(VI) from GB and HB COPR reached a steady state (5–20 mg/L) after 150 PVFs under groundwater and rainwater permeation. A substantial residual (>65%) of Cr(T) in the COPR was found after the column tests and continued releasing for an even more extended period (>250 PVFs). Higher concentrations of Cr(T) and Cr(VI) were released from COPR when permeated with groundwater relative to those with rainwater due to the highly alkaline (pH = 12.0) environment. Amorphous compounds may be a vital sink related to the release of the Cr from COPR, which can explain the higher release of Cr from HB COPR (33.2% and 22.5% cumulative leaching in groundwater and rainwater, respectively) than that from GB COPR (21.3% and 19.8% cumulative leaching in groundwater and rainwater, respectively). The temporal leaching behavior of Cr(T) obtained from the experiment was used as the input of a numerical model to investigate the long-term transport of Cr(T) through different soil substrates (sand or clay) as well as a bentonite cutoff wall. In an area with a sandy substrate of high permeability, a sand–bentonite cutoff wall is shown to control the transportation of Cr in the long term effectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ajmal, M., A. A. Nomani, and A. Ahmad. 1984. “Acute toxicity of chrome electroplating wastes to microorganisms: Adsorption of chromate and chromium(VI) on a mixture of clay and sand.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 23 (2): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206970.
Bartlett, R. J., and B. R. James. 1988. “Mobility and bioavailability of chromium in soils.” In Chromium in the natural and human environments, edited by J. O. Nriagu and E. Nieboer, 267–303. New York: Wiley.
Benson, C. H., H. Zhai, and X. Wang. 1994. “Estimating hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay liners.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (2): 366–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:2(366).
Boecher, A. T., J. M. Tinjum, and H. Xu. 2012. “Quantification of mineralogical and amorphous species in chromium ore processing residue.” J. Residuals Sci. Technol. 9 (4): 131–141.
Burke, T., J. Fagliano, M. Goldoft, R. E. Hazen, R. Tglewicz, and T. McKee. 1991. “Chromite ore processing residue in Hudson County, New Jersey.” Environ. Health Perspect. 92: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9192131.
Carroll, H., and J. Dye. 2009. Chromium transport study report, Dundalk Marine Terminal, Baltimore, Maryland. Englewood, CO: CH2M Hill.
Castelbaum, D., and C. D. Shackelford. 2009. “Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite slurry mixed sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1941–1956. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000169.
Chrysochoou, M., and D. Dermatas. 2007. “Application of the Rietveld method to assess chromium(VI) speciation in chromite ore processing residue.” J. Hazard. Mater. 141 (2): 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.081.
Chrysochoou, M., S. Fakra, D. Moon, and D. Dermatas. 2009. “Microstructural analyses of Cr(VI) speciation in chromite ore processing residue (COPR).” Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 5461–5466. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9005338.
Dermatas, D., and M. Chrysochoou. 2005. The Rietveld method as a tool for assessing heavy-metal immobilization in S/S treatment investigations. Stabilization/solidification treatment and remediation: Advances in s/s for waste and contaminated land. 97–106. London: Taylor & Francis.
Evans, J. C., and D. G. Ruffing. 2017. “Design and construction of an experimental soil–bentonite cut-off wall.” Geotech. Front. 2017: 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480441.018.
Geelhoed, J. S., J. C. Meeussen, S. Hillier, D. G. Lumsdon, R. P. Thomas, J. G. Farmer, and E. Paterson. 2002. “Identification and geochemical modeling of processes controlling leaching of Cr(VI) and other major elements from chromite ore processing residue.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66 (22): 3927–3942. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00977-8.
Geelhoed, J. S., J. C. Meeussen, D. G. Lumsdon, M. J. Roe, R. P. Thomas, J. G. Farmer, and E. Paterson. 1999. “Processes determining the behaviour of chromium in chromite ore processing residue used as landfill.” Land Contam. Reclam. 7 (4): 271–279.
Geelhoed, J. S., J. C. Meeussen, M. J. Roe, S. Hillier, R. P. Thomas, J. G. Farmer, and E. Paterson. 2003. “Chromium remediation or release? Effect of iron(II) sulfate addition on chromium(VI) leaching from columns of chromite ore processing residue.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (14): 3206–3213. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0264798.
Graham, M. C., J. G. Farmer, P. Anderson, E. Paterson, S. Hillier, D. G. Lumsdon, and R. J. Bewley. 2006. “Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue.” Sci. Total Environ. 364 (1–3): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.007.
Griffin, R. A., A. K. Au, and R. R. Frost. 1977. “Effect of pH on adsorption of chromium from landfill-leachate by clay minerals.” J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 12 (8): 431–449.
Hillier, S., M. J. Roe, J. S. Geelhoed, A. R. Fraser, J. G. Farmer, and E. Paterson. 2003. “Role of quantitative mineralogical analysis in the investigation of sites contaminated by chromite ore processing residue.” Sci. Total Environ. 308: 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00680-0.
Khan, F. I., T. Husain, and R. Hejazi. 2004. “An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies.” J. Environ. Manage. 71 (2): 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003.
Koch, W. E. 1986. Standard reference materials: Methods and procedures used at the National Bureau of Standards to prepare, analyse and certify SRM2694, simulated rainwater, and recommendations for use. Washington DC: US Dept. of Commerce/National Bureau of Standards.
Lioy, P. J., N. Freeman, T. Wainman, A. H. Stern, R. Boesch, T. Howell, and S. I. Shupack. 1992. “Microenvironmental analysis of residential exposure to chromium-laden wastes in and around new Jersey homes.” Risk Anal. 12 (2): 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00676.x.
Liu, L., W. Li, W. Song, and M. Guo. 2018. “Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability.” Sci. Total Environ. 633: 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.161.
Liu, Z., J. Zheng, W. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Ren, P. Ning, and Z. Lin. 2020. “Identification of the key host phases of Cr in fresh chromite ore processing residue (COPR).” Sci. Total Environ. 703: 135075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135075.
Lu, H., M. Luan, and J. Zhang. 2010. “Transport of Cr(VI) through clay liners containing activated carbon or acid-activated bentonite.” Appl. Clay Sci. 50 (1): 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.010.
Matern, K., H. Weigand, A. Singh, and T. Mansfeldt. 2017. “Environmental status of groundwater affected by chromite ore processing residue (COPR) dumpsites during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (4): 3582–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8110-2.
Meegoda, J. N., W. Kamolpornwijit, Z. Hu, R. Mueller, and R. Patraju. 2008. “Conversion of chromium ore processing residue to chrome steel.” In GeoCongress 2008: Geotechnics of Waste Management and Remediation, Geotechnical Special 177, edited by M. V. Khire, A. N. Alshawabkeh, and K. R. Reddy, 383–390. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Meuser, H. 2013. Groundwater, soil vapour and surface water treatment. In Vol. 23 of Soil remediation and rehabilitation, 279–346. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Millspaugh, A. M., J. M. Tinjum, and T. A. Boecher. 2010. “Specific gravity of expansive chromium ore processing residue with complex microstructure.” Geotech. Test. J. 33 (4): 1–7.
NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection). 2005. New Jersey chromium workgroup report for public comment and response to peer review comments. Trenton, NJ: NJDEP.
Rhoades, K., J. Eun, and J. M. Tinjum. 2016. “Transport of hexavalent chromium in the vadose zone by capillary and evaporative transport from chromium ore processing residue.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (4): 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0010.
Schwartz, C., A. Wylie, A. Davis, and B. James. 2000. Investigation of the expansive behavior of chromium tailings—Final report on phase II investigations. Baltimore: Maryland Port Administration.
Shackelford, C. D., and D. E. Daniel. 1991. “Diffusion in saturated soil. I: Background.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (3): 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:3(467).
Tinjum, J. M. 2006. “Mineralogical properties of chromium ore processing residue and chemical remediation strategies.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Tinjum, J. M., C. B. Benson, and T. B. Edil. 2008b. “Mobilization of Cr(VI) from chromite ore processing residue through acid treatment.” Sci. Total Environ. 391 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.041.
Tinjum, J. M., C. H. Benson, and L. R. Blotz. 1997. “Soil–water characteristic curves for compacted clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (11): 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:11(1060).
Tinjum, J. M., C. Houck, and C. French. 2008a. “Field investigation techniques for characterization and delineation of COPR.” In GeoCongress 2008: Geotechnics of Waste Management and Remediation, Geotechnical Special Publication 177, edited by M. V. Khire, A. N. Alshawabkeh, and K. R. Reddy, 407–414. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Wang, X., J. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Chen, H. Hou, J. Yang, and X. Lu. 2017. “Long-term stability of FeSO4 and H2SO4 treated chromite ore processing residue (COPR): Importance of H+ and SO42−.” J. Hazard. Mater. 321: 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.048.
Wazne, M., S. C. Jagupilla, D. H. Moon, C. Christodoulatos, M. Kaouris, J. Morris, and A. Koutsospyros. 2008. “Leaching mechanisms of Cr(VI) from chromite ore processing residue.” J. Environ. Qual. 37: 2125–2134. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0443.
Weng, C. H., C. P. Huang, H. E. Allen, A. H.-D. Cheng, and P. F. Sanders. 1994. “Chromium leaching behavior in soil derived from chromite ore processing waste.” Sci. Total Environ. 154 (1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90615-7.
Weng, C.-H., C. P. Huang, and P. F. Sanders. 2002. “Transport of Cr(VI) in soils contaminated with chromite ore processing residue (COPR).” Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage 6 (1): 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2002)6:1(6).
USEPA. 1998. Toxicological review of hexavalent chromium in support of summary information on the integrated risk information system (IRIS). Washington, DC: USEPA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25Issue 3July 2021

History

Received: Oct 28, 2020
Accepted: Mar 25, 2021
Published online: Apr 28, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jiannan Chen, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando 32816, FL. Email: [email protected]
Jongwan Eun, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Yuan Feng, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68588, NE. Email: [email protected]
James M. Tinjum, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53715, WI. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share