Technical Papers
Apr 28, 2021

Effect of Salinity on Moisture Flow and Root Water Uptake in Sandy Loam Soil

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25, Issue 3

Abstract

The present study analyzes the effect of salinity on crop growth and root zone soil moisture dynamics. A newly developed root water uptake (RWU) model was used for simulation of soil moisture and RWU for irrigation field experiments where paddy was grown with irrigation water with varying salinity concentrations (0.5, 7.9, 14.7, and 21.2 dS/m). The growth of the crop was monitored regularly, and crop parameters such as leaf area index (LAI) and root depth along with the soil moisture profile were measured during the crop growth period. The nonlinear parameter for the RWU model was estimated using an empirical relation in terms of observed crop variables (LAI and root depth) for each saline irrigation condition. Root zone soil moisture and RWU for the prevailing hydrometeorological conditions during the crop period and soil-crop parameters were simulated for the analysis. The irrigation experiments show that the growth of the crop is significantly affected by the salt concentration in soil-water, resulting in a decrease in the crop canopy (LAI) and root depth decreases with an increase in the salt concentration. The model simulation results show that an increase in salt concentration in irrigation water results in reduced root water extraction and reduced moisture content in the soil profile.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support received from the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Acm
adjustment coefficient;
C
specific soil moisture capacity;
ETc
crop evapotranspiration;
ETo
reference evapotranspiration;
Es
soil evaporation;
f(ψ)
matric stress response function;
f(π)
osmotic stress response function;
Kc
crop coefficient;
Kc adj
adjusted crop coefficient;
Ks
saturated hydraulic conductivity;
K(ψ)
unsaturated hydraulic conductivity;
LAIdense
normal leaf area index;
Rj max
maximum root depth;
S
sink term for RWU;
Smax
maximum root water extraction;
Tj
crop transpiration;
Tj max
maximum daily crop transpiration;
Ts
specific transpiration;
t
time coordinate;
tpeak
time in days to maximum daily transpiration/root depth;
z
vertical coordinate;
zrj
root depth on jth day;
α, β
parameters of RWU model;
αv, nv, mv
van Genuchten water retention parameters;
θ
volumetric soil moisture content;
θr
residual water content;
θs
saturation water content;
ψ
soil pressure head;
ψa
soil pressure head at anaerobiosis;
ψamc
pressure head at available moisture content;
ψfc
soil pressure head at field capacity;
ψw
soil pressure head at wilting point;
π
osmotic potential head;
πmax
critical osmotic head; and
πw
wilting point osmotic head.

References

Albasha, R., J. C. Mailhol, and B. Cheviron. 2015. “Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models—Experimental and numerical analysis.” Agric. Water Manage. 155: 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010.
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome: FAO.
Basile, A., G. Buttafuoco, G. Mele, and A. Tedeschi. 2012. “Complementary techniques to assess physical properties of a fine soil irrigated with saline water.” Environ. Earth Sci. 66 (7): 1797–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1404-2.
Bauder, J. W., and T. A. Brock. 1992. “Crop species, amendment, and water quality effects on selected soil physical properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (4): 1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040047x.
Bernstien, L. 1975. “Effects of salinity and sodicity on plant growth.” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 13 (1): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.13.090175.001455.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1980. Indian standards, methods of test for soils, Part 7: Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction, 1–9. IS:2720-7. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1985. Indian standard, methods of test for soils, Part 4: Grain size analysis, 1–38. IS:2720-4. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Browning, L. S., K. R. Hershberger, and J. W. Bauder. 2007. “Soil water retention at varying matric potentials following repeated wetting with modestly saline-sodic water and subsequent air drying.” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38 (19–20): 2619–2634. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701662836.
Cai, G., J. Vanderborght, M. Langensiepen, A. Schnepf, H. Hüging, and H. Vereecken. 2018. “Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (4): 2449–2470. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018.
Cardon, G. E., and J. Letey. 1992a. “Plant water uptake terms evaluated for soil water and solute movement models.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (6): 1876–1880. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060038x.
Cardon, G. E., and J. Letey. 1992b. “Soil-Based irrigation and salinity management model: II. Water and solute movement calculations.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (6): 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060040x.
Celia, M. A., E. T. Bouloutas, and R. L. Zarba. 1990. “A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (7): 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01483.
Chawla, K. L., B. K. Khosla, and D. R. Sharma. 1983. “Hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil as influenced by salinisation and desalinisation.” Irrig. Sci. 4 (4): 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389647.
Childs, S. W., and R. J. Hanks. 1975. “Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 39 (4): 617–622. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900040016x.
de Jong van Lier, Q., K. Metselaar, and J. C. van Dam. 2007. “Response to “comment on ‘root water extraction and limiting soil hydraulic conditions estimated by numerical simulation’”.” Vadose Zone J. 6 (3): 527–528. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0042L.
de Jong van Lier, Q., J. C. van Dam, and K. Metselaar. 2009. “Root water extraction under combined water and osmotic stress.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 (3): 862–875. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0157.
de Jong van Lier, Q., J. C. van Dam, and K. Metselaar. 2010. “Reply to “comment on ‘macroscopic root water uptake distribution using a matric flux potential approach’”.” Vadose Zone J. 9 (2): 503. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0167.
de Willigen, P., J. C. van Dam, M. Javaux, and M. Heinen. 2012. “Root water uptake as simulated by three soil water flow models.” Vadose Zone J. 11 (3): vzj2012.0018. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0018.
dos Santos, M. A., Q. de Jong Van Lier, J. C. van Dam, and A. H. F. Bezerra. 2017. “Benchmarking test of empirical root water uptake models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (1): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-473-2017.
Dudley, L. M., and U. Shani. 2003. “Modeling plant response to drought and salt stress: Reformulation of the root-sink term.” Vadose Zone J. 2 (4): 751–758. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.7510.
Erie, L. J., O. F. French, and K. Harris. 1965. Consumptive use of water by crops in Arizona. Tucson, AZ: Technical Bulletin (Univ. of Arizona).
Feddes, R. A., P. J. Kowalik, and H. Zaradny. 1978. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Wageningen, Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.
Gardener, W. R. 1960. “Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants.” Soil Sci. 89 (2): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196002000-00001.
Gonçalves, M. C., J. Šimunek, T. B. Ramos, J. C. Martins, M. J. Neves, and F. P. Pires. 2006. “Multicomponent solute transport in soil lysimeters irrigated with waters of different quality.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (8): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004802.
Hillel, D., C. G. E. M. van Beek, and H. Talpaz. 1975. “A microscopic-scale model of soil water uptake and salt movement to plant roots.” Soil Sci. 120 (5): 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197511000-00010.
Homaee, M. 1999. “Root water uptake under non-uniform transient salinity and water stress.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen Univ. and Research Center.
Homaee, M., C. Dirksen, and R. A. Feddes. 2002a. “Simulation of root water uptake I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions.” Agric. Water Manage. 57 (2): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00072-0.
Homaee, M., R. A. Feddes, and C. Dirksen. 2002b. “Simulation of root water uptake II. Non-uniform transient water stress using different reduction functions.” Agric. Water Manage. 57 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00071-9.
Homaee, M., R. A. Feddes, and C. Dirksen. 2002c. “Simulation of root water uptake III. Non-uniform transient combined salinity and water stress.” Agric. Water Manage. 57 (2): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00073-2.
Homaee, M., and U. Schmidhalter. 2008. “Water integration by plants root under non-uniform soil salinity.” Irrig. Sci. 27 (1): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0123-2.
Javaux, M., T. Schröder, J. Vanderborght, and H. Vereecken. 2008. “Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake.” Vadose Zone J. 7 (3): 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0115.
Jorda, H., A. Perelman, N. Lazarovitch, and J. Vanderborght. 2018. “Exploring osmotic stress and differences between soil–root interface and bulk salinities.” Vadose Zone J. 17 (1): 170029. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.01.0029.
Kumar, S., K. S. Hari Prasad, and D. S. Bundela. 2020. “Effect of sodicity on soil-water retention and hydraulic properties.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 146 (5): 04020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001461.
Levy, G. J., D. Goldstein, and A. I. Mamedov. 2005. “Saturated hydraulic conductivity of semiarid soils: Combined effects of salinity, sodicity, and rate of wetting.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69 (3): 653–662. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0232.
Li, K. Y., J. B. Boisvert, and R. De Jong. 1999. “An exponential root-water-uptake model.” Can. J. Soil Sci. 79 (2): 333–343. https://doi.org/10.4141/S98-032.
Mass, E. V., and G. J. Hoffman. 1977. “Crop salt tolerance—current assessment.” J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 103 (2): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001137.
Metselaar, K., and Q. de Jong van Lier. 2007. “The shape of the transpiration reduction function under plant water stress.” Vadose Zone J. 6 (1): 124–139. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0086.
Molz, F. J., and I. Remson. 1970. “Extraction term models of soil moisture use by transpiring plants.” Water Resour. Res. 6 (5): 1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i005p01346.
Molz, F. J., I. Remson, A. A. Fungaroli, and R. L. Drake. 1968. “Soil moisture availability for transpiration.” Water Resour. Res. 4 (6): 1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR004i006p01161.
Mualem, Y. 1976. “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
Nimah, M. N., and R. J. Hanks. 1973. “Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations: I. description and sensitivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 37 (4): 522–527. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700040018x.
Ojha, C. S. P., K. S. H. Prasad, V. Shankar, and C. A. Madramootoo. 2009. “Evaluation of a nonlinear root-water uptake model.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 135 (3): 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000067.
Ojha, C. S. P., and A. K. Rai. 1996. “Nonlinear root-water uptake model.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 122 (4): 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1996)122:4(198).
Paniconi, C., A. A. Aldama, and E. F. Wood. 1991. “Numerical evaluation of iterative and noniterative methods for the solution of the nonlinear richards equation.” Water Resour. Res. 27 (6): 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00334.
Peters, A., W. Durner, and S. C. Iden. 2017. “Modified feddes type stress reduction function for modeling root water uptake: Accounting for limited aeration and low water potential.” Agric. Water Manage. 185: 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.010.
Postiglione, L., G. Barbieri, and A. Tedeschi. 1995. “Long-term effects of irrigation with saline water on some characteristics of a clay loam soil.” Riv. Agronomia 29 (1): 24–30.
Prasad, R. 1988. “A linear root water uptake model.” J. Hydrol. 99 (3–4): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90055-8.
Pupisky, H., and I. Shainberg. 1979. “Salt effects on the hydraulic conductivity of a sandy soil.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43 (3): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300030001x.
Rhoades, J. D., A. Kandiah, and A. M. Mashali. 1992. The use of saline waters for crop production. Rome: FAO.
Richards, L. A. 1931. “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” J. Appl. Phys. 1 (5): 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010.
Richards, L. A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and sodic soils. Washington, DC: USDA Agriculture.
Russo, D. 2013. “Consequences of salinity-induced-time-dependent soil hydraulic properties on flow and transport in salt-affected soils.” Procedia Environ. Sci. 19: 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.071.
Russo, D., and E. Bresler. 1977. “Effect of mixed Na-Ca solutions on the hydraulic properties of unsaturated Soils1.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41 (4): 713–717. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100040019x.
Russo, D., A. Laufer, R. H. Shapira, and D. Kurtzman. 2013. “Assessment of solute fluxes beneath an orchard irrigated with treated sewage water: A numerical study.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (2): 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20085.
Shainberg, I., J. D. Rhoades, and R. J. Prather. 1981. “Effect of low electrolyte concentration on clay dispersion and hydraulic conductivity of a sodic soil.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45 (2): 273–277. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020009x.
Shalhevet, J., and Th. C. Hsiao. 1986. “Salinity and drought: A comparison of their effect on osmotic adjustment, assimilation, transpiratio and growth.” Irrig. Sci. 7 (4): 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270435.
Shankar, V., K. S. Hari Prasad, C. S. P. Ojha, and R. S. Govindaraju. 2012. “Model for nonlinear root water uptake parameter.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (10): 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000469.
Singh, P. N., and W. W. Wallender. 2008. “Effects of adsorbed water layer in predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity for clays with Kozeny–Carman equation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(829).
Singh, P. N., and W. W. Wallender. 2011. “Effects of soil water salinity on field soil hydraulic functions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137 (5): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000290.
Skaggs, T. H., M. Th. van Genuchten, P. J. Shouse, and J. A. Poss. 2006. “Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress.” Agric. Water Manage. 86 (1–2): 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.005.
Sonkar, I., H. P. Kotnoor, and S. Sen. 2019. “Estimation of root water uptake and soil hydraulic parameters from root zone soil moisture and deep percolation.” Agric. Water Manage. 222: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.037.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic condictivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1987. A numerical model for water and solute movement in and below the root zone. Riverside, CA: United States Dept. of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Salinity Laboratory.
Vrugt, J. A., J. W. Hopmans, and J. Simunek. 2001. “Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (4): 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541027x.
Wind, G. P. 1969. “Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method.” In Vol. 1 of Water in the Unsaturated Zone, Proc. Wageningen Symp., 181–191. Place de Fontenoy, Paris: International Association of Scientific Hydrology (IASH).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25Issue 3July 2021

History

Received: Jan 20, 2021
Accepted: Mar 10, 2021
Published online: Apr 28, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Satendra Kumar [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
Ickkshaanshu Sonkar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar 140001, India. Email: [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-917X. Email: [email protected]
K. S. Hari Prasad [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
C. S. P. Ojha, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Radar remote sensing-based inversion model of soil salt content at different depths under vegetation, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.13306, 10, (e13306), (2022).
  • Analysis of mulched drip irrigation with brackish water in cotton fields using the HYDRUS-3D numerical model, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 10.1139/cjss-2022-0047, 102, 4, (959-976), (2022).
  • A numerical model for simulating soil moisture dynamics and root water uptake under saline irrigation, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10.1080/09715010.2022.2076571, (1-14), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share