Abstract

For construction management students completing the construction planning and scheduling course to meet work expectations and provide effective benefit to their employers, the course curriculum should accurately reflect the needs of industry. The objective of this research is to identify the scheduling knowledge/expertise/proficiency that practitioners expect to see in a new hire and to compare this with what is currently offered in construction planning and scheduling courses. First, the syllabi of planning and scheduling courses offered in 55 construction management programs were collected and evaluated. Then, 35 critical topics and six student learning outcomes were identified by inspecting the accreditation requirements and the literature at large. Two survey questionnaires were developed and administered to instructors and industry practitioners to record the priorities they attached to those 35 topics and six students learning outcomes. The levels of importance and the degree of association reported by instructors and practitioners were analyzed. The result indicates that instructors’ and practitioners’ priorities concerning scheduling topics and learning outcomes are not in sync. Recommendations are provided to help instructors who teach construction planning and scheduling to design their syllabus accordingly, to improve their curriculum by understanding what practitioners expect from professional schedulers, and to encourage practitioners to update their knowledge and expectations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abudayyeh, O., J. Russell, D. Johnston, and J. Rowings. 2000. “Construction engineering and management undergraduate education.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (3): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(169).
Adnan, H., N. Hashim, N. Mohd, and N. Ahmad. 2012. “Ethical issues in the construction industry: Contractor’s perspective.” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 35: 719–727.
Ahmed, S. M., C. Yaris, R. U. Farooqui, and M. Saqib. 2014. “Key attributes and skills for curriculum improvement for undergraduate construction management programs.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 10 (4): 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.900833.
Akintoye, A. S. 1998. “Delivery of postgraduate programmers in construction management in the UK: An industrial perspective.” In Building education and research. London: E & FN Spon.
Anthony, T., S. Vedaraman, H. Evan, and A. Eric. 2015. “Peer teaching in construction project management scheduling.” In Proc., ASEE Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Arditi, D., and G. Polat. 2010. “Graduate education in construction management.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 136 (3): 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000014.
Bhattacharjee, S., S. Ghosh, D. E. Young-Corbett, and C. M. Fiori. 2013. “Comparison of industry expectations and student perceptions of knowledge and skills required for construction career success.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 9 (1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2011.647248.
Binnekamp, R., A. Wolfert, O. Kammouh, and M. Nogal. 2020. “The open design education approach—An integrative teaching and learning concept for management and engineering.” In Proc., 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conf. (EDUCON). New York: IEEE.
Burgett, J. M., A. Perrenoud, and J. P. Smith. 2018. “Identification and prioritization of critical subject matter within mechanical systems curriculum in construction management education.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 14 (4): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1372535.
CCCSE (Center for Community College Student Engagement). 2014. Contingent commitments: Bringing part-time faculty into focus. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Cicmil, S., and H. Gaggiotti. 2018. “Responsible forms of project management education: Theoretical plurality and reflective pedagogies.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (1): 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.005.
Collier, K. 2001. Construction contracts. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Damci, A., D. Arditi, and G. Polat. 2013. “Resource leveling in line-of-balance scheduling.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 28 (9): 679–692.
Danaei, K. J. 2019. “Literature review of adjunct faculty.” Educ. Res. Theory Pract. 30 (2): 17–33.
Department of the Army. 2018. Engineering regulation no: 1-1-11. Washington, DC: USAC.
Fahmy, A., T. M. Hassan, and H. Bassionic. 2014. “Questionnaire survey on dynamic scheduling in construction.” PM World J. 5 (3): 1–20.
FMI (Fails Management Institute). 2004. Survey of construction industry ethical practices. Vienna, VA: Construction Management Association of America.
Forcael, E., V. Gonzalez, F. Orozco, A. Opazo, A. Suazo, and P. Aranguiz. 2015. “Application of problem-based learning to teaching the critical path method.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 141 (3): 04014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000236.
Galloway, P. D. 2006. “CPM scheduling—How industry views its use.” Cost Eng. 48 (1): 24–29.
Greenberg, J., A. McKee, and K. Walsh. 2015. “Teacher prep review: A review of the nation’s teacher preparation programs.” SSRN Electr. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2353894.
Gu, C., and W. T. Li. 2018. “Thinking and exploration on teaching of construction organization and schedule control course.” Sci. Technol. Innovation Guide 15 (29): 133–134.
Guerrero, D., M. Palma, and G. La Rosa. 2014. “Developing competences in engineering students. The case of project management course.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 112 (Feb): 832–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1239.
Guggemos, A. A., and M. Khattab. 2015. “Beyond the industry advisory board: Increasing the role of industry engagement to support program quality.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Han, S., J. O. Choi, and J. T. O’Connor. 2017. “Quality of baseline schedules: Lessons from higher education capital facility projects.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 143 (1): 04016017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000302.
Hanna, A. S., and K. T. Sullivan. 2005. “Bridging the gap between academics and practice: A capstone design experience.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 131 (1): 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:1(59).
Hauck, A. J. 1997. “Construction management curriculum reform and integration with a broader discipline: A case study.” In Proc., 33rd Annual Conf., 33–44. Seattle: Univ. of Washington.
Holt, G. D. 1997. “Construction research questionnaires and attitude measurement: Relative index or mean?” J. Constr. Procure. 3 (2): 88–96.
Howard, H. S. 1986. “A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods.” Med. Educ. 20 (6): 481–486.
Howard, L. G., Z. Xi, A. Anika, E. P. Paul, and P. Andrew James. 2014. “Preparing teachers and university students to translate engineering research to K-8 students in an after-school program.” In Proc., ASEE Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2019. “Litigation proneness of dispute resolution clauses in construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000301.
Jian-Wei, Y. 2011. “Problems needing solution in current quality supervision and countermeasures.” Shanxi Archit. 37 (31): 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.149.
Kholbaev, B. A. 2020. “Efficient project management: Work breakdown structure.” Econ. Innovative Technol. 4 (3): 1–10.
Lee, S., and L. Chinn. 2018. CIOB undergraduate education framework. Bracknell, UK: Chartered Institute of Building.
Lee, S., D. Nikolic, and J. I. Messner. 2015. “Framework of the virtual construction simulator 3 for construction planning and management education.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (2): 05014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000388.
Li, Y., L. I. Yongkui, L. Jinghua, and P. Zongzheng. 2018. “Exploration on teaching reform of project schedule management based on 4D-BIM.” Res. Explor. Lab. 37 (12): 213–216.
MacCarthy, B. L., and J. R. Wilson. 2001. Human performance in planning and scheduling Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Meyer, M. D., and L. J. Jacobs. 2000. “A civil engineering curriculum for the future: The Georgia Tech case.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 126 (2): 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:2(74).
Oglesby, C. H. 1990. “Dilemmas facing construction education and research in 1990s.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (1): 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:1(4).
Palles-Clark, R. 2006. “Time impact analysis.” Contract J. 434 (6581): 26.
Prince, M. J., R. M. Felder, and R. Brent. 2007. “Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies.” J. Eng. Educ. 96 (4): 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00939.x.
Prince, R. H. 2006. “Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 12 (2): 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0030-y.
Richard, R., H. Donna, O. Andrea, and B. Michael. 2009. “Diffusing prevention through design principles through engineering textbooks.” In Proc., ASEE Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Schmid, B. 2020. “Development of an open textbook for engineering economics.” In Proc., 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. Content Access. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Sengupta, D., and M. M. El-Halwagi. 2017. “Incorporating systems thinking in the engineering design curriculum: Path forward for sustainability education.” In Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies, 201–213. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Souder, C., and D. M. Gier. 2006. “What does the construction industry expect from recent construction management graduates?” In Proc., 42nd ASC Annual Conf. Cheyenne, WY: Associated Schools of Construction.
Summers, M. L. 2002. “Developing a college industry relationship: The use of industrial advisory boards.” In Proc., 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
USACE. 2017. Project schedules: Regulation No. 1-1-11. Washington, DC: USACE.
Wang, W. 2017. “Exploration on teaching reform of engineering project schedule planning and control course guided by practical ability goal.” China Manage. Inf. 20 (1): 254–255.
Wentz, B., J. Sweet, and M. M. Schneier. 2014. Construction law for design professionals, construction managers and contractors. Singapore: Cengage Learning.
Wong, C. H., G. D. Holt, and P. A. Cooper. 2000. “Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 18 (7): 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900433050.
Xu, N., and L. Wang. 2016. “The application of workshop teaching method in scheduling course.” Educ. Teach. Forum 8 (8): 165–166.
Zecheru, V., and B. G. Olaru. 2016. “Work breakdown structure (WBS) in project management.” Rev. Int. Comp. Manage. 17 (1): 61–69.
Zhili, G., M. Charles, and G. Zhi. 2012. “Integrating building information modeling (BIM) in teaching project scheduling and control.” In Proc., ASEE Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 148Issue 3July 2022

History

Received: Jan 17, 2021
Accepted: Feb 10, 2022
Published online: Mar 30, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 30, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, North China Univ. of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-6745. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82072 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-2282. Email: [email protected]
Yingjie Liu [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, North China Univ. of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China. Email: [email protected]
David Arditi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616. Email: [email protected]
Chenchen Xu [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, North China Univ. of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China. Email: [email protected]
Euysup Shim, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Technology, Illinois State Univ., Normal, IL 61790. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the positive factors influencing the performance of Ghanaian construction projects, Construction Innovation, 10.1108/CI-08-2022-0190, (2024).
  • A Review of the Digital Skills Needed in the Construction Industry: Towards a Taxonomy of Skills, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13112711, 13, 11, (2711), (2023).
  • Research on the Innovation of Talent Cultivation Mode and Industry-Education Integration Mechanism of College Education in the Internet Era, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 10.2478/amns.2023.2.01354, 9, 1, (2023).
  • Teaching lessons learnt by civil-engineering teachers from the COVID-19 pandemic at the University of Burgos, Spain, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0279313, 17, 12, (e0279313), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share