Abstract

The Geotechnical Women Faculty (GTWF) project has aimed since its inception in 2016 to promote gender parity among faculty within the subfield of geotechnical engineering and to increase the quality and number of connections among current faculty. This paper is a case study of one element of the GTWF project that offered seed grants to gender-diverse faculty groups to foster networking, collaborative, and mentoring relationships. Seed grants were evaluated through participants’ final reports and interviews conducted by GTWF project researchers. Content analysis was performed on the interview data using two different coding methods, manual and quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) Miner, which were used together to identify key themes. The effectiveness of this project’s seed grants were judged through qualitative assessment, a novel approach among the existing literature on seed grant programs. The study’s findings demonstrate the effectiveness of small grant funding in promoting collaboration and mentoring among junior faculty and leading to greater reported levels of confidence and self-efficacy. Seed grant recipients experienced financial success, with approximately 50% of seed grant projects obtaining additional grant funding.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

A project of this scope and duration is due to the labor of many dozens of individuals, only a few of whom can we properly thank. Among those present at the outset, we thank Dr. Rick Fragaszy (now retired) of the NSF for his decades of championing women in the geotechnical field. We also thank Caitlin Caron for her many hours on content analysis and project coordination and for conducting the interviews that made this paper possible, Ananya Bhupathipali for content analysis and database maintenance, and the student employees who labored intensively at the daily tasks required to sustain such an undertaking. A mighty thank you goes to our fantastic colleagues at Syracuse University Sharon Alestalo for her contribution to the GTWF project from the very beginning, both workshops, and seed grant development, as well as her razor-sharp editing and insights; Sabina Redington, for handling all sorts of budgetary complexities; and Lisa Keley-Heyn for coordinating between Syracuse and “the outside world.” Additionally, we would like to thank the dozens of specialists, technicians, and support staff that allowed all of these projects to run—the building maintenance, IT, administrative, and transportation workers who keep the universities in shape and enable all the work that goes on there. Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Award No. CMMI-1536542. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and are not necessarily consistent with the policies or opinions of the NSF.

References

Abadie, A., A. Christy, and M. Lima. 2006. “Longitudinal survey of female faculty in biological & agricultural engineering in the United States and Canada.” Trans. ASABE 52 (4): 1397–1405.
Alestalo, S. W., S. K. Bhatia, and B. Sukumaran. 2015. “Support of women geotechnical engineering faculty: History and initiatives.” In Proc., 2015 Int. Association of Foundation Drilling, the Deep Foundations Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ayoub, M., S. Gottschalk, and B. Muller. 2017. “Impact of public seed-funding on academic spin-offs.” J. Technol. Transfer. 42 (5): 1100–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9476-5.
Belotto, J. 2018. “Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis.” Qual. Rep. 23 (11): 2622–2633.
Bhatia, S. K. 1989. Women in geotechnical engineering: Issues and prospects. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Cho, Y. I. 2008. “Intercoder reliability.” In Encylopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Costa, J. 1999. “The impact of seed-grant funding on extramural research awards.” In Proc., Research Papers in Economics. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.21620.
Douglas, J. W., and R. E. Hartley. 2011. “The fly ball effect: A theoretical framework for understanding the impacts of short-term seed grants.” Public Budgeting Financial 31 (4): 74–92.
Fleming, L. N. 2008. “Diversity in engineering education: An African-American female professor’s perspective.” Leadership Manage. Eng. 8 (1): 32–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:1(32).
Ford, D., A. Harkins, and C. Parnin. 2017. “Someone like me: How does peer parity influence participation of women on stack overflow?” In Proc., IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing. New York: IEEE.
Fujioka, L., S. Hom, and L. Wilkins. 2007. ISISHAWAII: The power of one plus one for bringing girls and young women into the science and engineering pipeline. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Gallagher, P. M., S. W. Alestalo, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, S. K. Bhatia, and S. Soundarajan. 2017. “Connecting faculty in geotechnical engineering: Thriving in a networked world.” GeoStrata 2 (21): 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481622.034.
Gallagher, P. M., S. W. Alestalo, S. K. Bhatia, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and S. Soundarajan. 2018. “Geotechnical women faculty from 1989–2017: A U.S. Case study.” In Proc., 2018 Int. Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo., 5–10. Dallas: IFCEE.
Gallagher, P. M., S. K. Bhatia, S. W. Alestalo, S. Soundarajan, and A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos. 2019. “Increasing collaboration among geotechnical engineering faculty: A case study from the ‘geotechnical engineering women faculty: Networked and thriving’ project.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2019: Data, Software, Education, and a Tribute to Ralph Peck, 86–98. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hartman, H., et al. 2019. “Strategies for improving diversity and inclusion in an engineering department.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 145 (2): 04018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000404.
Howe, C. 2010. “Confronting the unique challenges faced by new female faculty.” In Proc., Conf. ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Leibowitz, B., V. Bozalek, J. Farmer, J. Garraway, N. Herman, J. Jawitz, and L. Quinn. 2017. “Collaborative research in contexts of inequality: The role of social reflexivity.” Higher Educ. 74 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0029-5.
Leonard, K., and G. Nicholls. 2013. “History and status of female faculty in civil engineering.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 139 (3): 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000152.
Misra, J., L. Smith-Doerr, D. Nilanjana, G. Weaver, and J. Normanly. 2017. “Collaboration and gender equity among academic scientists.” Soc. Sci. 6 (1): 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010025.
NSF.gov. 2020. “Advance at a glance.” Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/.
Riegle, S. 2006. “Mentoring and socialization: Senior female faculty and mentoring practices.” Int. J. Learn. Change 4 (1): 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2006.013911.
Roy, J. 2019. Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Van Dijk, H., and M. L. van Engen. 2019. “The flywheel effect of gender role expectations in diverse work groups.” Front. Psychol. 10 (May): 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00976.
Yip, J., and K. Kram. 2017. Developmental networks: Enhancing the science and practice of mentoring, 88–100. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Yoder, B. L. 2015. Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Yun, J., B. Baldi, and M. D. Sorcinelli. 2016. “Mutual mentoring for early-career and underrepresented faculty: Model, research, and practice.” Innov. Higher Educ. 41 (5): 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9359-6.
Zuiches, J. J. 2013. “The impact of seed grants as incentives for engagement.” J. Higher Educ. Outreach Engagement 17 (4): 57–74.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 147Issue 3July 2021

History

Received: Jul 20, 2020
Accepted: Oct 29, 2020
Published online: Feb 18, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse Univ., 151 Link Hall Syracuse, Syracuse, NY 13244. (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-774X. Email: [email protected]
Data Analyst, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse Univ., 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-1347. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Drexel Univ., 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9844-8978. Email: [email protected]
Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 421 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720. Email: [email protected]
Sucheta Soundarajan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Electrical and Computer Science, Syracuse Univ., 4-127 Center for Science and Technology, Syracuse, NY 13244. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • State of the Field: Changing Geotechnical Faculty Demographics and Recognition, Geo-Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784484067.048, (485-496), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share