Motivating Engineering Students by Providing Two Midterm Exams and Dropping the Lower Mark
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 147, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper investigated the effect of grade dropping on students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction. In three different engineering courses that were taught by the author, an optional second midterm exam was offered near the end of the semester. The optional second midterm exam covered materials that were not covered by the first midterm exam. The lower mark of the two exams would be dropped for students who chose to take the optional second midterm exam. Both observational assessment (by using two-tailed -tests and -tests to measure the improvements in students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction) and students’ feedback (through an online survey) were utilized. It was found that grade dropping led to significant improvements in students’ performance on the comprehensive final exam, class attendance rates (due to the increased motivation), and students’ satisfaction (as expressed in students’ evaluation for the adequacy and fairness of the grading policy). The lowest-performing and highest-performing students did not significantly benefit from grade dropping. Furthermore, the effects of grade dropping were more significant for male students than for female students.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data (in aggregated form without any personal identifiers) that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2020a. “At a glance.” Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.abet.org/about-abet/at-a-glance/.
ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2020b. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2019–2020: Criterion 3. Student outcomes.” Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3.
Benson, L., A. Kirn, and C. Faber. 2013. “CAREER: Student motivation and learning in engineering.” In Proc., 120th ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, Paper No. 6363. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Grant, D., and W. B. Green. 2013. “Grades as incentives.” Empirical Econ. 44 (3): 1563–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0578-0.
Griffin, R., A. MacKewn, E. Moser, and K. W. Van Vuren. 2013. “Learning skills and motivation: Correlates to superior academic performance.” Bus. Educ. Accredit. 5 (1): 53–65.
Hadsell, L., and R. J. MacDermott. 2010. “Grade dropping, strategic behavior, and student satisficing.” Am. J. Bus. Educ. 3 (7): 57–72.
Lin, Y., W. McKeachie, and Y. Kim. 2003. “College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning.” Learn. Individual Differ. 13 (3): 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4.
MacDermott, R. J. 2013. “The impact of assessment policy on learning: Replacement exams or grade dropping.” J. Econ. Educ. 44 (4): 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2013.825114.
Maksy, M. M. 2012a. “Major factors associated with the performance of students taking undergraduate accounting courses at the upper level.” Int. J. Bus. Acc. Finance 6 (2): 159–177.
Maksy, M. M. 2012b. “Motivation and distraction factors associated with student performance in intermediate accounting: An empirical investigation.” J. Acc. Finance 12 (3): 188–208.
Martin, H., S. Vital, L. Ellis, and C. Obrien-Delpesh. 2018. “Motivating civil engineering students: Self-determinacy perspective.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 144 (4): 04018005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000374.
Matei, M., and M. Abrudan. 2011. “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: An investigation of performance correlation.” Ann. Faculty Econ. 1 (1): 671–677.
Nelson, C. 1996. “Student diversity requires different approaches to college teaching, even in math and science.” Am. Behav. Sci. 40 (2): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764296040002007.
Pintrich, P. R. 2003. “A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts.” J. Educ. Psychol. 95 (4): 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
Richardson, M., C. Abraham, and R. Bond. 2012. “Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Psychol. Bull. 138 (2): 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.
Sewell, E. 2004. “Grade dropping: An empirical analysis.” J. Econ. Educ. 35 (1): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.24-34.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 28, 2019
Accepted: May 27, 2020
Published online: Aug 17, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 17, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.