Technical Papers
Jun 5, 2020

Exploring First-Year Engineering Students’ Innovation Self-Efficacy Beliefs by Gender and Discipline

Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

The expectations for engineers to solve complex, global issues are growing at rates that exceed current curricula in engineering education. Studies show that early career engineering students are not confident in their ability to innovate. In this paper, the authors investigated the innovation self-efficacy beliefs (i.e., questioning, observing, experimenting, idea networking, and associational thinking) of first-year engineering students and how those beliefs might differ by gender and engineering discipline. This study used multiple regression to examine the innovation self-efficacy beliefs of 2,678 first-year engineering students. Findings indicate men interested in construction management engineering had significant innovation self-efficacy beliefs in all areas except idea networking. Of those interested in civil engineering, only women were more likely to hold innovation self-efficacy beliefs in the area of experimenting. The authors’ work highlights how students enter college with positive innovation self-efficacy beliefs and uncovers specific behavioral and cognitive skills that can be developed through the engineering curricula.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation CAREER Grant No. 1554057.

References

Abudayyeh, O., J. Russell, D. Johnston, and J. Rowings. 2000. “Construction engineering and management undergraduate education.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (3): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(169).
Adams, R. S., S. Daly, L. Mann, and G. Dall’Alba. 2011. “Being a professional: Three perspectives on design thinking, acting, and being.” Des. Stud. 32 (6): 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.004.
ASCE. 2008. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Aschauer, A. B. 1999. “Tinkering with technological skill: An examination of the gendered uses of technologies.” Comput. Compos. 16 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)80003-6.
Atman, C. J., R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem. 2007. “Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners.” J. Eng. Educ. 96 (4): 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x.
Atman, C. J., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna. 2008. “Characterizing design learning: A mixed-methods study of engineering designers’ use of language.” J. Eng. Educ. 97 (3): 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00981.x.
Atwood, S. A., and J. E. Pretz. 2016. “Creativity as a factor in persistence and academic achievement of engineering undergraduates.” J. Eng. Educ. 105 (4): 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20130.
Bairaktarova, D., and M. Eodice. 2017. Creative ways of knowing. New York: Springer.
Bandura, A. 1991. “Social cognitive theory of self-regulation.” Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Processes 50 (2): 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
Bandura, A. 2006. “Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.” Self-Efficacy Beliefs Adolesc. 5 (1): 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Becerik-Gerber, B., D. J. Gerber, and K. Ku. 2011. “The pace of technological innovation in architecture, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into the curricula.” Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 16: 411–432.
Becher, T., and P. R. Trowler. 2001. “Disciplinary socialization.” In Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, 41–54. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
Beddoes, K., and M. Borrego. 2008. “Feminist theory in three engineering education journals: 1995–2008.” J. Eng. Educ. 100 (2): 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00014.x.
Besterfield-Sacre, M., M. F. Cox, M. Borrego, K. Beddoes, and J. Zhu. 2014. “Changing engineering education: Views of U.S. faculty, chairs, and deans.” J. Eng. Educ. 103 (2): 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20043.
Bix, A. S. 2004. “From ‘engineeresses’ to ‘girl engineers’ to ‘good engineers’: A history of women’s U.S. engineering education.” NWSA J. 16 (1): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.2004.0028.
Brownell, S. E., M. J. Kloser, T. Fukami, and R. Shavelson. 2012. “Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based ‘cookbook’ and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences.” J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 41 (4): 36–45.
Brunhaver, S. R., R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley, and S. D. Sheppard. 2017. “Bridging the gaps between engineering education and practice.” In U.S. engineering in a global economy, 129–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bucciarelli, L. L., and S. Kuhn. 1997. “Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit.” In Between craft and science: Technical work in US settings, edited by S. R. Barley and J. E. Orr, 210. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Carrillo, P., and P. Chinowsky. 2006. “Exploiting knowledge management: The engineering and construction perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 22 (1): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:1(2).
Charyton, C., R. J. Jagacinski, J. A. Merrill, W. Clifton, and S. DeDios. 2011. “Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering.” J. Eng. Educ. 100 (4): 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00036.x.
Clough, M. P., and K. J. Kauffman. 1999. “Improving engineering education: A research-based framework for teaching.” J. Eng. Educ. 88 (4): 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00481.x.
Crismond, D., and R. S. Adams. 2012. “The informed design teaching and learning matrix.” J. Eng. Educ. 101 (4): 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x.
Crismond, D., L. Gellert, R. Cain, and S. Wright. 2013. “Minding design missteps a watch list of misconceptions for beginning designers.” Sci. Children 51 (2): 80–85.
Cropley, D. H. 2015. “Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education.” Psychol. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 9 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000008.
Daly, S. R., E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert. 2014. “Teaching creativity in engineering courses.” J. Eng. Educ. 103 (3): 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048.
Danielak, B. A., A. Gupta, and A. Elby. 2014. “Marginalized identities of sense-makers: Reframing engineering student retention.” J. Eng. Educ. 103 (1): 8–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20035.
Denning, P. J., and R. Dunham. 2010. The innovator’s way: Essential practices for successful innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeVellis, R. F. 2016. Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dubois, A., and L.-E. Gadde. 2002. “The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 20 (7): 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210163543.
Dyer, J. H., H. Gregersen, and C. M. Christensen. 2011. The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Dyer, J. H., H. B. Gregersen, and C. Christensen. 2008. “Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures.” Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2 (4): 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.
Dym, C. L., A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. Leifer. 2005. “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning.” J. Eng. Educ. 94 (1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.
Eris, O. 2004. Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.
Faulkner, W. 2009a. “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. I. Observations from the field.” Eng. Stud. 1 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620902721322.
Faulkner, W. 2009b. “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox.” Eng. Stud. 1 (3): 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620903225059.
Ferguson, D. M., E. J. Cawthorne, Jr., B. Ahn, and M. W. Ohland. 2013. “Engineering innovativeness.” J. Eng. Entrepreneurship 4 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7814/jeen5v3p1fcah.
Ferguson, D. M., K. W. Jablokow, M. W. Ohland, and S. Purzer. 2017a. “Identifying the characteristics of engineering innovativeness.” Eng. Stud. 9 (1): 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1312419.
Ferguson, D. M., K. W. Jablokow, M. W. Ohland, and S. Purzer. 2017b. “The diverse personas of engineering innovators.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 33 (1): 19–29.
Ferrari, A., R. Cachia, and Y. Punie. 2009. Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. Brussels, Belgium: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission.
Frehill, L. M. 2004. “The gendered construction of the engineering profession in the united states, 1893–1920.” Men Masculinities 6 (4): 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260963.
Glassman, A. M., and R. Opengart. 2016. “Teaching innovation and creativity: Turning theory into practice.” J. Int. Bus. Educ. 11: 113.
Godwin, A., G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock. 2016a. “Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice.” J. Eng. Educ. 105 (2): 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118.
Godwin, A., G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler. 2016b. “Disciplinary differences in out-of-school high school science experiences and influence on students’ engineering choices.” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res. 6 (2): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1131.
Godwin, A., D. Verdín, B. S. Benedict, R. A. Baker, T. J. Milton, and J. T. Yeggy. 2018. “Board 51: CAREER: Actualizing latent diversity: Building innovation through engineering students’ identity development.” In Proc., 2018 ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/30050.
Goldin, C., and L. Katz. 2008. The race between technology and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Habib, E., C. Cruz-Neira, Y. Ma, and D. Williams. 2010. “Development of a virtual hydrologic observatory for integration of field observations and model simulations into engineering hydrology courses.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Hartman, H., and M. Hartman. 2009. “Do gender differences in undergraduate engineering orientations persist when major is controlled?” Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol. 1 (1): 61–82.
Honaker, J., G. King, and M. Blackwell. 2011. “Amelia II: A program for missing data.” J. Stat. Software 45 (7): 1–47.
Hutchison, M., D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner. 2006. “Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students.” J. Eng. Educ. 95 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00876.x.
Johnston, D. W., N. T. Ahluwalia, and M. B. Gwyn. 2007. “Improving the professional engineering licensure process for construction engineers.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (9): 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133%3A9(669).
Jorgenson, J. 2002. “Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work.” Manage. Commun. Q. 15 (3): 350–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902153002.
Kale, S., and A. E. Karaman. 2012. “Benchmarking the knowledge management practices of construction firms.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 18 (3): 335–344. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.698910.
Kirton, M. 1976. “Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure.” J. Appl. Psychol. 61 (5): 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622.
Kleysen, R. F., and C. T. Street. 2001. “Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior.” J. Intellectual Capital 2 (3): 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660.
Leonardi, P. M., M. H. Jackson, and A. Diwan. 2009. “The enactment-externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering.” Acad. Manage. J. 52 (2): 400–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37315471.
Lord, S. M., R. A. Layton, M. W. Ohland, and M. K. Orr. 2013. “Student demographics and outcomes in electrical and mechanical engineering.” In Proc., 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE), 57–63. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684788.
Marshman, E. M., Z. Y. Kalender, T. Nokes-Malach, C. Schunn, and C. Singh. 2018. “Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm?” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14 (2): 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123.
National Academy of Engineering. 2012. Lifelong learning imperative in engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2010. Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
NSF and NCSES (National Science Foundation and National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics). 2017. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Alexandria, VA: NSF and NCSES.
Ohland, M. W., S. M. Lord, and R. A. Layton. 2015. “Student demographics and outcomes in civil engineering in the United States.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (4): 7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000244.
Perry-Smith, J. E., and P. V. Mannucci. 2017. “From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 42 (1): 53–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462.
Perry-Smith, J. E., and C. E. Shalley. 2003. “The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 28 (1): 89–106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925236.
Pilotte, M. K. 2013. “Engineering: Defining and differentiating its unique culture.” Ph.D. dissertations, Purdue Univ. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3714228/.
Postman, P. N., and C. Weingartner. 1969. Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Delta.
Potvin, G., Z. Hazari, L. Klotz, A. Godwin, R. Lock, J. Cribbs, and N. Barclay. 2013. “Disciplinary differences in engineering students’ aspirations and self-perceptions.” In Proc., ASEE 2013 Annual Conf. & Exposition, 1–11. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/19452.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2012. “Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.” Accessed November 12, 2019. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-executive-report-final_2-13-12.pdf.
Redish, E. F., and K. A. Smith. 2008. “Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers.” J. Eng. Educ. 97 (3): 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00980.x.
Schaller, R. R. 1997. “Moore’s law: Past, present and future.” IEEE Spectr. 34 (6): 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/6.591665.
Schar, M., S. K. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. D. Sheppard. 2017. “Innovation self-efficacy: A very brief measure for engineering students.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education.
Schexnayder, C., and S. Anderson. 2011. “Construction engineering education: History and challenge.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (10): 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000273.
Schwartz, J., L. Collins, H. Stockton, D. Wagner, and B. Walsh. 2017. Rewriting the rules for the digital age: 2017 Deloitte global human capital trends. New York: Deloitte University Press.
Scott, G., L. E. Leritz, and M. D. Mumford. 2004. “The effectiveness of creativity training.” Creativity Res. J. 16 (4): 361–388. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048004517.
Scott, S. G., and R. A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.” Acad. Manage. J. 37 (3): 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701.
Simonton, D. K. 1984. “Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 46 (6): 1273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273.
Smith, J. L., K. L. Lewis, L. Hawthorne, and S. D. Hodges. 2013. “When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.” Personality Social Psychol. Bull. 39 (2): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212468332.
Snyder, T. D., C. de Brey, and S. A. Dillow. 2016. “Digest of education statistics, 2014.” Accessed August 29, 2019. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016006.
Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2013. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. London: Pearson Education.
Tonso, K. L. 1999. “Engineering gender—Gendering engineering: A cultural model for belonging.” J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 5 (4): 365. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v5.i4.60.
Tonso, K. L. 2006. “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world.” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 1 (2): 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2.
Tota-Maharaj, K. 2012. “A critical perspective of an online hands-on laboratory framework for environmental engineering courses.” Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 2 (3): 58. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v2i3.2104.
US Department of Education, and Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics. n.d. IPEDS: Integrated postsecondary education data system. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Education.
Verdín, D., and A. Godwin. 2018. “Exploring Latina first-generation college students’ multiple identities, self-efficacy, and institutional integration to inform achievement in engineering.” J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 24 (3): 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2018018667.
Verdín, D., A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G. Potvin. 2018a. “Engineering women’s attitudes and goals in choosing disciplines with above and below average female representation.” Social Sci. 7 (3): 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030044.
Verdín, D., A. Godwin, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler. 2018b. “Understanding how first-generation college students’ out-of-school experiences, physics and STEM identities relate to engineering possible selves and certainty of career path.” In Proc., IEEE Frontiers in Education. New York: IEEE.
Wickham, H. 2009. Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
Williams, M. M., and C. George-Jackson. 2014. “Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in stem.” J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 20 (2): 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014004477.
Winthrop, R., E. McGivney, T. Williams, and P. Shankar. 2016. “Innovation and technology to accelerate progress in education.” In Background paper for education commission, 1–86. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Wolf, G. 1996. “Steve Jobs: The next insanely great thing.” Wired Magazine 4: 67–76.
Wulf, W. W., and G. M. Fisher. 2002. “A makeover for engineering education.” Issues Sci. Technol. 18 (3): 35–39.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146Issue 4October 2020

History

Received: May 28, 2019
Accepted: Mar 6, 2020
Published online: Jun 5, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Polytechnic School, Arizona State Univ., Tempe AZ 85281 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-1104. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Engineering Education, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47906. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-3356. Email: [email protected]
School of Engineering Education, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47906. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-7640. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share