A Grounded-Theory Study of Civil Engineering Design Practice in Malaysia
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146, Issue 2
Abstract
The heart of engineering lies in problem solving. Critical thinking and mathematical thinking are inexorably linked and indispensable in complex engineering problem solving. However, the preparedness of prospective engineers in terms of having the required skills to face future challenges in the engineering workplace is still questionable and worrisome. Therefore, a study to understand the application of these two types of thinking in professional engineering practice is urgently crucial. This study focuses on having insight into the interrelation and interaction among pertinent elements of critical thinking and mathematical thinking used by engineers in professional civil engineering design practice, in the form of a substantive theory. This paper presents qualitative research using a modified grounded-theory method. Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight informants from engineering firms through theoretical sampling. Data were analyzed using modified grounded-theory analysis with analytic tools to interrelate the inductive codes, which contrasts with the more usual grounded-theory analysis. The substantive theory, named math-related critical thinking, explains six essential processes used in professional engineering design for justifying decisions reasonably. The substantive theory provides useful information for prospective engineers and engineering education, along with some implications for designing engineering curricula.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ABET. 2014. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore: ABET.
Aizikovitsh, E., and M. Amit. 2009. “An innovative model for developing critical thinking skills through mathematical education.” In Proc., Int. Conf. of the Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project: Models in developing mathematics education, edited by L. Paditz and A. Rogerson, 19–22. Dresden, Germany: Univ. of Applied Sciences.
Aizikovitsh, E., and M. Amit. 2010. “Evaluating an infusion approach to the teaching of critical thinking skills through mathematics.” Procedia–Social Behav. Sci. 2 (2): 3818–3822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.596.
Almunifi, A. A., and A. Y. Aleryani. 2019. “Knowledge and skills level of graduate civil engineers employers and graduates’ perceptions.” Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 9 (1): 84–101. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i1.9744.
ASCE. 2008. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bailin, S., R. Case, J. R. Coombs, and L. B. Daniels. 1999. “Conceptualizing critical thinking.” J. Curriculum Stud. 31 (3): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183133.
Bailin, S., and H. Siegel. 2003. “Critical thinking.” In The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education, edited by N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, and P. Standish, 181–193. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beyer, B. K. 1995. Critical thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Birks, M., and J. Mills. 2011. Grounded theory: A practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Bloom, B. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded E.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Cardella, M. E. 2006. Engineering mathematics: An investigation of students’ mathematical thinking from a cognitive engineering perspective. Washington, DC: Univ. of Washington.
Cardella, M. E., and C. Atman. 2007. “Engineering students’ mathematical thinking: In the wild and with a lab based task.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 12.652.1–12.652.13. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Ceylan, T., and L. W. Lee. 2003. “Critical thinking and engineering education.” In Proc., Sectional Conf., 41–43. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria.” Qual. Sociology 19 (6): 418–427.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. 2008. “The selection of a research design.” In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 3rd ed. 3–22. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. London: Pearson.
Croft, A., and J. Ward. 2001. “A modern and interactive approach to learning engineering mathematics.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 32 (2): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00190.
Devlin, K. J. 2002. The math gene: How mathematical thinking evolved and why numbers are like gossip. New York: Basic Books.
Devlin, K. J. 2012. Introduction to mathematical thinking. Palo Alto, CA: Keith Devlin.
Duderstadt, J. J. 2008. Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research and education. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan.
EAC-BEM (Engineering Accreditation Council, Board of Engineers Malaysia). 2012. Engineering programme accreditation manual. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: EAC-BEM.
Ennis, R. H. 1985. “A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills.” Educ. Leadersh. 43 (2): 44–48.
Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities.” In Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, edited by J. B. Baron and R. S. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Facione, P. A. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. 2007. “Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts.” Accessed December 15, 2014. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/similar?doi=10.1.1.334.894&type=cc.
Facione, P. A. 2013. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A., N. C. Facione, and C. A. Giancarlo. 2000. “The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill.” Informal Logic 20 (1): 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254.
Felder, R. 2012. “Engineering education: A Tale of two paradigms.” In Shaking the foundations of geo-engineering education, edited by B. McCabe, M. Pantazidou, and D. Phillips, 9–14. Leiden, Netherlands: CRC Press.
Forcael, E., G. Garce, P. Backhouse, and E. Bastias. 2018. “How do we teach? A practical guide for engineering educators.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 34 (5): 1451–1466.
Furedy, C., and J. J. Furedy. 1985. “Critical thinking: Toward research and dialogue.” In Using research to improve teaching: New directions for teaching and learning, edited by J. G. Donald and A. M. Sullivan, 51–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Glaser, B. G. 2008. “The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.” Grounded Theory Rev. 7 (3): 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843.
Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Johnson, B., and L. Christensen. 2000. Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Jonassen, D., J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee. 2006. “Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators.” J. Eng. Educ. 95 (2): 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.
Jonassen, D. H. 2004. Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kadir, M. A. A. 2007. “Critical thinking: A family resemblance in conceptions.” Educ. Hum. Dev. 1 (2): 1–11.
Katagiri, S. 2004. Mathematical thinking and how to teach it. Tokyo: Meijitosyo.
King, F., L. Goodson, and F. Rohani. 2008. Higher order thinking skills. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State Univ.
Knutson, C. 2012. “Critical thinking, getting it right.” Accessed June 21, 2015. http://www.engineerleader.com/critical-thinking-getting-it-right/.
Lipman, M. 1988. “Critical thinking—What can it be?” Educ. Leadersh. 8 (1): 38–43.
Lowden, K., S. Hall, D. Elliot, and J. Lewin. 2011. Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. London: Edge Foundation.
Manoharan, T., M. J. Masnan, and M. S. Abu. 2007. “Teaching mathematics for future engineers: Overcoming issues of educational inadequacies.” In Proc., Regional Conf. on Engineering Education, 479–486. Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Marcut, I. 2005. “Critical thinking—Applied to the methodology of teaching mathematics.” Educatia Matematica 1 (1): 57–66.
Mason, J., L. Burton, and K. Stacey. 2010. Thinking mathematically. 2nd ed. London: Pearson.
Matlin, M. W. 2009. Cognition. 7th ed. Danvers, MA: Wiley.
McGowan, W. R., and C. R. Graham. 2009. “Factors contributing to improved teaching performance.” Innovative Higher Educ. 34 (3): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9103-6.
Munohsamy, T. 2015. “Malaysian employers’ perspective on engineering graduates’ employability skills: Evidence from 10 years of studies.” Palgo J. Educ. Res. 3 (2): 150–159.
Murali, S., and Y. Rajaram. 2015. “A study on the corporate expectations from engineering graduates in India–Bangalore.” J. Bus. Manage. 17 (6): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-17630109.
National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Osman, S., M. S. Abu, S. Mohammad, and M. Mokhtar. 2015a. “Integrating pertinent elements of critical thinking and mathematical thinking used by practicing civil engineers in grounded theory analysis.” J. Social Sci. Res. 8 (3): 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v8i3.3597.
Osman, S., M. S. Abu, S. Mohammad, and M. Mokhtar. 2015b. “Interrelation among pertinent elements of critical thinking and mathematical thinking in the real-world practice of civil engineering.” Malaysian J. Civ. Eng. 27 (2): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v27n2.376.
Osman, S., M. S. Abu, S. Mohammad, and M. Mokhtar. 2016. “Identifying pertinent elements of critical thinking and mathematical thinking used in civil engineering practice in relation to engineering education.” Qual. Rep. 21 (2): 212–227.
Osman, S., S. Mohammad, and M. S. Abu. 2015c. “A preliminary study on the integral relationship between critical thinking and mathematical thinking among practicing civil engineers.” AIP Conf. Proc. 1660 (1): 070030. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915748.
Osman, S., S. Mohammad, M. S. Abu, M. Mokhtar, and J. Ahmad. 2019. “Math-related critical thinking theory in civil engineering design.” Pertanika J. Social Sci. Humanities 27 (2): 899–913.
Paul, R. 2004. “The state of critical thinking today.” Accessed July 19, 2014. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-state-of-critical-thinking-today/523#top.
Paul, R. 2007. “Critical thinking in every domain of knowledge and belief.” Accessed August 21, 2014. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-in-every-domain-of-knowledge-and-belief/698.
Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2008. The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. 5th ed. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Paul, R. W. 1990. “Critical thinking: What, why, and how.” In Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.
Schoenfeld, A. H. 1985. Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. 1992. “Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics.” In Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning, edited by D. Grouws, 334–370. New York: MacMillan.
Scott, K. W. 2004. “Relating categories in grounded theory analysis: Using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix.” Qual. Rep. 9 (1): 113–126.
Scott, K. W., and D. Howell. 2008. “Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory: Using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 7 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700201.
Siegel, H. 2010. “Critical thinking.” In International encyclopedia of education, 141–145. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Sigel, I. E. 1984. “A constructivist perspective for teaching thinking.” Educ. Leadersh. 42 (3): 18–21.
Spinks, N., N. Silburn, and D. Birchall. 2006. Educating engineers for the 21st century: The industry view. Henley-on-Thames, UK: Henley Management College.
Stacey, K. 2007. What is mathematical thinking and why is it important?. Parkville, VIC, Australia: Univ. of Melbourne.
Sternberg, R. J. 2012. “What is mathematical thinking.” In The nature of mathematical thinking, edited by R. J. Sternberg and T. Ben-Zeev, 303–316. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Svinicki, M. D. 2010. A guidebook on conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas.
Tishman, S., E. Jay, and D. N. Perkins. 1993. “Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation.” Theory Pract. 32 (3): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590.
Townend, M. S. 2001. “Integrating case studies in engineering mathematics: A response to SARTOR 3.” Teach. Higher Educ. 6 (2): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045195.
Villalba, E. 2011. “Critical thinking.” In Encyclopedia of creativity. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Wood, T., G. Williams, and B. McNeal. 2006. “Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures.” J. Res. Math. Educ. 37 (3): 222–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035059.
World Economic Forum. 2016. The future jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
World Economic Forum. 2018. The future of jobs report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146 • Issue 2 • April 2020
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 9, 2018
Accepted: Oct 2, 2019
Published online: Dec 30, 2019
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 30, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.