Technical Papers
Oct 5, 2015

Dynamic Management of Risk Contingency in Complex Design-Build Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 2

Abstract

Contingency budgets are commonly used by managers to respond to uncertainty and control the project within the original cost and schedule targets. However, a variety of project participants with conflicting interests creates tensions when it comes to managing the risk contingency escrow account during the project development, and divergences often arise over the need for either retaining the unspent contingencies (for future risk and improved facility) or releasing it as a profit. With the purpose of studying the dynamics and main influences involved in the risk contingency management process of a design-build (DB) project, a system dynamics (SD) contingency management model is proposed to simulate the decision-making scenarios, under different project conditions and behavioral pressures of senior managers and owners. The model suggests that an aggressive proactive risk management practice might be an effective policy for managing the contingency budget in a complex engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) project.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous company for availability and support to this study. The authors wish also to thank Mr. Luca Morra, graduate student from the M.Sc. Program in Engineering & Management at Politecnico di Torino for effective and passionate contribution to this work.

References

Baccarini, D. (2005). “Understanding project cost contingency—A survey.” 〈http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2004-0105-0113_Baccarini.pdf〉 (Feb. 20, 2015).
Barraza, G. A., and Bueno, R. A. (2007). “Cost contingency management.” J. Manage. Eng., 23(3), 140–146.
Del Caño, A., and Pilar de la Cruz, M. (2002). “Integrated methodolody for project risk management.” J. Manage. Eng., 128(6), 473–485.
Doloi, H. (2012). “Empirical analysis of traditional contracting and relationship agreements for procuring partners in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 29(3), 224–235.
FIDIC. (2000). The FIDIC contracts guide, Geneva.
Ford, D. N. (2002). “Achieving multiple objectives through contingency management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1), 30–39.
Gordon, C. M. (1994). “Choosing appropriate construction contracting method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 196–209.
Günhan, S., and Arditi, D. (2007). “Budgeting owner’s construction contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(7), 492–497.
Harper, C., Molenaar, K., Anderson, S., and Schexnayder, C. (2014). “Synthesis of performance measures for highway cost estimating.” J. Manage. Eng., 04014005.
Idrus, A., Fadhil Nuruddin, M., and Rohman, M. A. (2011). “Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system.” Expert Syst. Appl., 38(3), 1501–1508.
IPMA (International Project Management Association). (2006). “IPMA competence baseline.” Nijkerk, Netherlands.
Kapsali, M. (2011). “Systems thinking in innovation project management: A match that works.” Int. J. Project Manage., 29(4), 396–407.
Khamooshi, H., and Cioffi, D. F. (2009). “Program risk contingency budget planning.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 56(1), 171–179.
Kutsch, E., and Hall, M. (2005). “Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertainty in information technology projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 23(8), 591–599.
Kwakkel, J. H., and Pruyt, E. (2015). “Using system dynamics for grand challenges: The ESDMA approach.” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 32, 358–375.
Lyneis, J. M., and Ford, D. N. (2007). “System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 23(2/3), 157–189.
Mak, S., and Picken, D. (2000). “Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(2), 130–136.
Miller, R., and Lessard, D. (2001). “Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19(8), 437–443.
Mills, A. (2001). “A systematic approach to risk management for construction.” Struct. Survey, 19(5), 245–252.
Mingers, J., and White, L. (2010). “A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 207(3), 1147–1161.
Osipova, E., and Eriksson, E. (2013). “Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 31(3), 391–399.
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., and De Meyer, A. (2002). “On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.” Manage. Sci., 48(8), 1008–1023.
PMI (Project Management Institute). (2009). “Practice standard for project risk management.” Newtown Square, PA.
Repenning, N. (2000). “A dynamic model of resource allocation in multi-project research and development systems.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 16(3), 173–212.
Repenning, N., and Sterman, J. D. (2001). “Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement.” Calif. Manage. Rev., 43(4), 64–88.
Richardson, G. P. (2011). “Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 27(3), 219–243.
Seyedhoseini, S. M., Noori, S., and Hatefi, M. A. (2009). “An integrated methodology for assessment and selection of the project risk response actions.” Risk Anal., 29(5), 752–763.
Sonmez, R., Ergin, A., and Birgonul, M. T. (2007). “Quantitative methodology for determination of cost contingency in international projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 23(1), 35–39.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, McGrawHill, New York.
Thal, A. E., Jr., Cook, J. J., and White, E. D., III (2010). “Estimation of cost contingency for air force construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(11), 1181–1188.
Tseng, C. L., Zhao, T., and Fu, C. C. (2009). “Contingency estimation using a real options approach.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 27(11), 1073–1087.
VensimDSS version 6.3 [Computer software]. Ventana Systems, Harvard, MA.
Weston, H. (1999). “Turner construction company: Management control systems.” Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
Xie, H., AbouRizh, S., and Zou, J. (2012). “Quantitative method for updating cost contingency throughout project execution.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 759–766.
Zhang, Y., and Fan, Z.-P. (2013). “An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies.” Int. J. Project Manage., 32(3), 412–422.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 2February 2016

History

Received: Oct 6, 2014
Accepted: Jul 7, 2015
Published online: Oct 5, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 5, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alberto De Marco, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Carlo Rafele [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, NIT-SCEE, National Univ. of Sciences and Technology, H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share