TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 25, 2009

Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management Success at Project and Organizational Levels in Contracting Firms

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

This research focuses on contracting firms within the construction sector. It characterizes and evaluates the composition of organizational culture using four culture types (clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchy), the strategic approach for knowledge flow, and the success of knowledge management (KM) systems at different hierarchical levels of contracting organizations (project and parent organization level). Responses from managers of local or overseas contracting firms operating in Hong Kong were collected using a carefully constructed questionnaire survey that was distributed through electronic mail. The organizational value is analyzed in terms of the four cultural models. Clan culture is found to be the most popular at both project and organization levels, which means that the culture of contracting firms very much depends on honest communication, respect for people, trust, and cohesive relationships. On the other hand, hierarchy culture, which focuses on stability and continuity, and analysis and control, seems to be the least favored at both levels. Another significant finding was that the two main KM strategies for knowledge flow, codification and personalization, were employed at both project and organization levels in equal proportion. This indicates that successful KM efforts at both enterprise levels utilize a hybrid and balanced approach for their knowledge flow, and that they complement each other. The findings also revealed that knowledge management system success factors emphasize the support of the management level. The results show that KM is critical and beneficial as indicated by 64% at the project and 74% at the organization level. The expectation is higher for organizations as they are the organizational memories in which experiences of past projects are archived and connected. Understanding these factors and the relationships among them has been demonstrated to be critical in order to increase the chances of success or to help with making decisions when applying KM.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bellaver, R. F., and Lusa, J. M. (2002). Knowledge management strategy and technology, Artech House, London.
Cameron, K. S., and Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture-based on the competing values framework, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Carrillo, P., Robinson, H., Al-Ghassani, A., and Anumba, C. (2004). “Knowledge management in UK construction: Strategies, resources and barriers.” Proj. Manage. J., 35(1), 46–56.
Chait, L. P. (2000). “Creating a successful KM system.” IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev., 28(2), 92–95.
Cong, X. M., and Pandya, K. V. (2003). “Issues of knowledge management in the PUBLIC sector.” Electron. J. Knowl. Manage., 1(2), 25–33.
Davenport, T. H., DeLong, D. W., and Beers, M. C. (1998). “Successful knowledge management projects.” Sloan Manage. Rev., 39(2), 43–57.
DeLong, D. W. (2004). Lost knowledge: Confronting the threat of an aging workforce, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fernie, S., Green, S. D., Weller, S. J., and Newcombe, R. (2003). “Knowledge sharing: Context, confusion and controversy.” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21(3), 177–187.
Foray, D., and Gault, F. (2003). “Measurement of knowledge management practices.” Measuring knowledge management in the business sector: First step, OECD Publications, Paris, 11–28.
Frappaolo, C. (2002). Knowledge management, Capstone, Oxford.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (1999). “What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?” Harvard Bus. Rev., 77(2), 106–115.
Hariharan, A., and Cellular, B. (2005). “Implementing seven KM enablers at Bharti.” Knowledge Management Review, 8(3), 8–9.
Hooijberg, R., and Petrock, F. (1993). “On cultural change: Using the competing values framework to help leaders execute a transformation strategy.” Hum. Resour. Manage., 32(1), 29–50.
Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., and Carrillo, P. M. (2005). “Cross-project knowledge management.” Knowledge management in construction, C. J. Anumba, C. O. Egbu, and P. M. Carrillo, eds., Blackwell, Oxford, 103–120.
Koenig, M. (2001a). “Don’t fall for that false dichotomy! Codification vs. personalization.” KMWorld Magazine, 10(8), ⟨http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Feature/Don%E2%80%99t-fall-for-that-false-dichotomy!-Codification-vs.-personalization--9272.aspx⟩ (Mar. 18, 2008).
Koenig, M. E. D. (2001b). “Lessons from the study of scholarly communication for the new information era.” Scientometrics, 51(3), 511–523.
Koenig, M. E. D. (2002) “Time saved—A misleading justification for KM.” KMWorld Magazine, 11(5), ⟨http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Feature/Time-saved—a-misleading-justification-for-KM--9347.aspx⟩ (Feb. 15, 2008).
Koenig, M. E. D., and Srikantaiah, T. K. (2004) Knowledge management lessons learned: What works and what doesn’t, American Society for Information Science and Technology for Information Today, Inc., Medford, N.J.
Love, P. E. D., Fong, P. S. W., and Irani, Z. (2005). Management of knowledge in project environments, Elsevier, New York.
Marwick, A. D. (2001). “Knowledge management technology.” IBM Syst. J., 40(4), 814–830.
O’Neill, R. M., and Quinn, R. E. (1993). “Applications of the competing values framework.” Hum. Resour. Manage., 32(1), 1–7.
Palmer, J., and Platt, S. (2005). Business case for knowledge management in construction, CIRIA, London.
Prusak, L. (1998). “Where did knowledge management come from?” IBM Syst. J., 40(4), 1002–1007.
Quinn, R. E., and Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). “The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life.” Research on organizational change and development, R. W. Woodman and W. A. Pasmore, eds., JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., 115–142.
Saint-Onge, H. (2002) Human Structural and Customer Capital, working paper, ⟨http://www.knowinc.com/saint-onge⟩ (Sept. 26, 2005).
Shand, D. (1998). “Harnessing knowledge management technologies in R&D.” Knowledge Management Review, 3, 20–26.
Tijhuis, W. (2005) Report on the Meeting held 15 June 2005, Helsinki, Finland, ⟨http://www.cibworld.nl/website/newsletter/0503/TG23Report.html⟩ (Jan. 9, 2006).
Yeung, A., Brockbank, J. W., and Ulrich, D. (1991). “Organizational culture and human resources practices: An empirical assessment.” Research on organizational change and development, R. W. Woodman and W. A. Pasmore, eds., JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., 59–81.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 1348 - 1356

History

Received: Jun 2, 2008
Accepted: Jun 22, 2009
Published online: Jun 25, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Patrick S. W. Fong [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Cecilia W. C. Kwok
Dept. of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share