Technical Papers
Jul 14, 2021

Seismic Response of Braced Heavy Timber Frames with Riveted Connections

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 5

Abstract

Braced timber frames (BTFs) are one the most efficient lateral load–resisting systems to resist earthquake and high wind loads. Design guidelines for this system currently do not exist in Canadian wood design standards. Only seismic force modification factors for moderately ductile BTFs and limited-ductility frames are specified by the National Building Code of Canada. The code is vague about what types of connections can be used to achieve moderately ductile or limited ductility BTFs. This study investigated the seismic response of 30 BTFs using rivets designed with Rd=2.0 and Ro=1.5 by conducting pushover analysis following the coefficient evaluation method. The influence of key design parameters—i.e., configurations (single- versus multistory), number of stories, story heights, and aspect ratios of the tiers—on the stiffness, strength, and ductility of BTFs was discussed. The proposed seismic force modification factors for BTFs with riveted connections were evaluated preliminarily using the concept of collapse margin ratio (CMR). It was found that the system ductility of BTFs was much lower than that of connections. Single-story buildings possessed higher ductility, and CMR compared with multistory buildings. Single- and multistory BTFs with wider bays had higher strength ratio of demand to capacity and lower ductility and CMR. The building height limit of 20  m was conservative for multistory BTFS. The response of the investigated BTFs proved that Rd=2.0 and Ro=1.5 were appropriate for the seismic design of BTFs with riveted connections. Moreover, connections with ductility not less than that of riveted connections can be adopted by moderately ductile BTFs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

ASCE. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing building. ASCE/SEI 41. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral force resisting systems for buildings. ASTM E2126. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Bruneau, M., C.-M. Uang, and R. Sabelli. 2011. Ductile design of steel structures. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Buchanan, A. H., B. L. Deam, J. A. Dean, and P. J. Moss. 1989. “Multi-storey timber buildings.” In Proc., of Workshop on Structural Behaviour of Timber Structures. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. EN1998-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, Z., Y. H. Chui, and G. Doudak. 2014a. “An approach for estimating seismic force modification factor of hybrid building systems.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Chen, Z., Y. H. Chui, C. Ni, and J. Xu. 2014b. “Seismic response of midrise light wood-frame buildings with portal frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4013003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000882.
Chen, Z., C. Ni, C. Dagenais, and S. Kuan. 2020. “WoodST: A temperature-dependent plastic-damage constitutive model used for numerical simulation of wood-based materials and connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (3): 040119225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002524.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2020a. “Connection and system ductility relationship for braced timber frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (12): 04020257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002839.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2020b. Expanding wood use towards 2025: Seismic performance of braced mass timber frames—Year 2. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2021. Expanding wood use towards 2025: Performance and draft design guidelines for braced timber frames under lateral loads. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Chen, Z., M. Popovski, and P. Symon. 2019. Solutions for upper mid-rise and mass timber high-rise construction—Seismic performance of braced mass timber frames—Year 1. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Engineering design in wood. CSA O86. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia. 2016. ABAQUS analysis user’s manual (version 6.14). Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia.
Karacabeyli, E., and C. Lum. 2021. Technical guide for the design and construction of tall wood buildings in Canada 2nd edition. Pointe-Claire, Canada: FPInnovations.
Kia, S. M., and M. Yahyai. 2004. “Relationship between local and global ductility demand in steel moment resisting frames.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, 885. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Lee, D.-G., J.-K. Song, and C.-B. Yun. 1997. “Estimation of system-level ductility demands for multi-storey structures.” Eng. Struct. 19 (12): 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00010-2.
Llanes-Tizoc, M. D., A. Reyes-Salazar, E. Bojorquez, J. Bojorquez, A. Lopez-Barraza, J. L. Rivera-Salas, and J. R. Gaxiola-Camacho. 2019. “Local, story, and global ductility evaluation for complex 2D steel buildings: Pushover and dynamic analysis.” MDPI Appl. Sci. 9 (1): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010200.
MacRae, G. 2010. “The development and use of the continuous column concept.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Urban Earthquake Engineering and 5th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
MacRae, G., Y. Kimura, and C. Roeder. 2004. “Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior.” J. Struct. Div. 106 (7): 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(381).
Mahmoodi, M., and A. Tasnimi. 2000. “Relationship between local and global ductility for concrete moment resisting frames.” In Proc., 3rd Conf. of Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Mitchell, D., R. Tremblay, E. Karacabeyli, P. Paultre, M. Saatcioglu, and D. L. Anderson. 2003. “Seismic force modification factors for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1139/l02-111.
NRC (National Research Council of Canada). 2015. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: NRC.
Oussalem, M., C. Farid, B. Ali, H. Ourida, and B. Abderrahim. 2013. “Local ductility and global behavior factor of steel frame structures braced by centered bars system.” Chem. Mater. Res. 5: 11–15.
Paulay, T., and M. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley.
Popovski, M. 2000. “Seismic performance of braced timber frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Popovski, M. 2004. Structural systems with riveted connections for non-residential buildings. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Forintek Canada.
Popovski, M. 2009. Lateral load resisting systems for engineered wood construction. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Popovski, M., and K. Karacabeyli. 2004. “Seismic performance of riveted connections in heavy timber construction.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Popovski, M., and K. Karacabeyli. 2006. “Seismic behaviour of structural systems with riveted connections in timber construction.” In Proc., 8th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (100th Anniversary Earthquake Conf.). Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Popovski, M., and K. Karacabeyli. 2008. “Force modification factors and capacity design procedures for braced timber frames.” In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Popovski, M., H. Prion, and E. Karacabeyli. 2002. “Seismic performance of connections in heavy timber construction.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 29 (3): 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1139/l02-020.
Popovski, M., H. Prion, and E. Karacabeyli. 2003. “Shake table tests on single-storey braced timber frames.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-060.
Reyes-Salazar, A., E. Bojorquez, J. Bojorquez, F. Valenzuela-Beltran, and M. D. Llanes-Tizoc. 2018. “Energy dissipation and local, story, and global ductility reduction factors in steel frames under vibrations produced by earthquakes.” Shock Vib. 2018: 9713685. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9713685.
Su, R. K. L., T. O. Tang, and C. L. Lee. 2013. “Evaluation of local and global ductility relationships for seismic assessment for regular masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames using a coefficient-based method.” Earthquakes Struct. 5 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.1.001.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Wada, A., Z. Qu, H. Ito, S. Motoyui, H. Sakata, and K. Kasai. 2009. “Seismic retrofit using rocking walls and steel dampers.” In Proc., ATC/SEI Conf. on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Yasumura, M. 1990. “Seismic behaviour of braced frames in timber construction.” In Proc., 23rd Meeting of the Int. Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Working Commission W18—Timber Structures. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 5October 2021

History

Received: Sep 17, 2020
Accepted: Apr 6, 2021
Published online: Jul 14, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 14, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Scientist, Building Systems, FPInnovations, 2665 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7051-358X. Email: [email protected]
Marjan Popovski, M.ASCE [email protected]
Lead Scientist, Building Systems, FPInnovations, 2665 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Cyclic Behavior and Damage Assessment of Superelastic SMA Dowel Connections for Braced Timber Frame Applications, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4686, 38, 5, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share