Cyclic Behavior and Damage Assessment of Superelastic SMA Dowel Connections for Braced Timber Frame Applications
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38, Issue 5
Abstract
Braced timber frames (BTFs) are an efficient lateral force resisting system that can effectively resist wind and earthquake loads. It is well-known that the performance of BTFs is strongly dependent on connection behavior, but clear design guidelines are not available for detailing ductile BTFs. Furthermore, conventional connections with steel fasteners can exhibit significant stiffness and strength degradation under earthquake loads and result in large residual deformations. There is a need for more resilient energy-dissipating connections for BTFs and other mass timber systems. This study investigates the behavior of dowel-type and bolted wood-steel-wood connections with superelastic nickel-titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloy (SMA) fasteners. Under bending, the SMA fasteners are able to effectively recover their original shape with negligible residual deformation, even after undergoing large deflections. The SMA connections tested in this research showed significant potential for self-centering. Post-test autopsies of the connection test specimens showed ductile deformation mechanisms and similar levels of wood crushing between the steel and SMA fasteners under cyclic loading. However, the connection displacement ductility ratios of 4.6 and 6.2 observed with SMA fasteners is not sufficient to meet the requirement for moderately ductile frames. Additional research is required to better understand and characterize the behavior of SMA connections at the component and connection levels.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Alam, M. S., M. Nehdi, and M. A. Youssef. 2008. “Shape memory alloy-based smart RC bridges: Overview of state-of-the-art.” Smart Struct. Syst. 4 (3): 367–389. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2008.4.3.367.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of wood and wood-based materials. ASTM D2395-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for evaluating dowel-bearing strength of wood and wood-based products. ASTM D5764-97a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral force resisting systems for buildings. ASTM E2126. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. ASTM D4442. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for determining bending yield moment of nails. ASTM F1575M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baird, Z., J. Woods, C. Viau, and G. Doudak. 2023. “Seismic performance of bolted glulam timber brace connections with internal steel plates.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 1176–1182. Oslo, Norway: World Conference on Timber Engineering 2023.
Blomgren, H.-E., J.-P. Koppitz, A. Diaz Valdés, and E. Ko. 2016. “The heavy timber buckling-restrained braced frame as a solution for commercial buildings in regions of high seismicity.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 3515–3524. Vienna, Austria: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Brown, J., M. Li, A. Palermo, S. Pampanin, and F. Sarti. 2021. “Investigating CLT lateral load resisting systems for taller timber buildings.” In Proc., 2021 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conf. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Brühl, F., U. Kuhlmann, and A. Jorissen. 2011. “Consideration of plasticity within the design of timber structures due to connection ductility.” Eng. Struct. 33 (11): 3007–3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.013.
Canadian Standards Association. 2019. Engineering design in wood. CSA-O86. Mississauga, ON, Canada: Canadian Standards Association Group.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2014. Eurocode 5—Design of timber structures—Part 1-1: General—Common rules and rules for buildings. EN 1995-1-1:2004/A2:2014. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2020a. “Connection and system ductility relationship for braced timber frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (12): 04020257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002839.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2020b. Expanding wood use towards 2025: Seismic performance of braced mass timber frames—Year 2. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Chen, Z., and M. Popovski. 2021. “Seismic response of braced heavy timber frames with riveted connections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (5): 04021051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001618.
Chen, Z., M. Popovski, and P. Symons. 2019. Solutions for upper mid-rise and high-rise mass timber construction: Seismic performance of braced mass timber frames—Year 1. Vancouver, BC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Chen, Z., D. Tung, and E. Karacabeyli. 2022. Modelling guide for timber structures. Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Christopoulos, C., R. Tremblay, H.-J. Kim, and M. Lacerte. 2008. “Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (1): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96).
Daneshvar, H., Y. H. Chui, C. Dickof, and T. Tannert. 2023. “Experimental parametric study of perforated steel plate fuses for mass timber seismic force resisting systems.” J. Build. Eng. 73 (Aug): 106772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106772.
Daneshvar, H., J. Niederwestberg, C. Dickof, R. Jackson, and Y. Hei Chui. 2022. “Perforated steel structural fuses in mass timber lateral load resisting systems.” Eng. Struct. 257 (Apr): 114097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114097.
Erochko, J., C. Christopoulos, R. Tremblay, and H. J. Kim. 2013. “Shake table testing and numerical simulation of a self-centering energy dissipative braced frame.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (11): 1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2290.
Fang, C., M. C. H. Yam, H. Ma, and K. F. Chung. 2015. “Tests on superelastic Ni–Ti SMA bars under cyclic tension and direct-shear: Towards practical recentering connections.” Mater. Struct. 48 (4): 1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0212-4.
Granello, G., A. Palermo, S. Pampanin, S. Pei, and J. van de Lindt. 2020. “Pres-Lam buildings: State-of-the-art.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (6): 04020085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002603.
Hajimirza, S. T., P. Dusicka, A. Smith, and C. Griffin. 2019. “Cyclic behavior of self-centering mass timber wall and floor system.” In Proc., 12th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
Hashemi, A., P. Zarnani, F. M. Darani, A. Valadbeigi, G. C. Clifton, and P. Quenneville. 2018. “Damage avoidance self-centering steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) using innovative resilient slip friction joints (RSFJs).” Key Eng. Mater. 763 (Feb): 726–734. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.726.
Huang, H., and W. S. Chang. 2017. “Seismic resilience timber connection—Adoption of shape memory alloy tubes as dowels.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 24 (10): e1980. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1980.
Huang, H., W.-S. Chang, K. Chen, and B. Key. 2019. “Study of SMA-dowelled timber connection reinforced by densified veneer wood under cyclic loading.” MATEC Web Conf. 275 (Mar): 01015. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927501015.
Jorissen, A. 1998. “Double shear timber connections with dowel type fasteners.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ.
Karacabeyli, E., and C. Lum. 2022. Technical guide for the design and construction of tall wood buildings in Canada. Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada: FPInnovations.
Kim, H. J., and C. Christopoulos. 2009. “Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post-tensioned self-centering steel frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (3): 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.859.
Ma, H., T. Wilkinson, and C. Cho. 2007. “Feasibility study on a self-centering beam-to-column connection by using the superelastic behavior of SMAs.” Smart Mater. Struct. 16 (5): 1555. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/008.
Miller, D. J., L. A. Fahnestock, and M. R. Eatherton. 2012. “Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace.” Eng. Struct. 40 (Jul): 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
Miller, S., J. E. Woods, J. Erochko, D. T. Lau, and C. F. Gilbert. 2021. “Experimental and analytical fragility assessment of a combined heavy timber–steel-braced frame through hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (2): 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3329.
Muños, W., A. Salenikovich, M. Mohammad, and P. Quenneville. 2008. “Determination of yield point and ductility of timber assemblies: In search for a harmonised approach.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Miyazaki, Japan: Engineered Wood Products Association.
Newcombe, M. P., S. Pampanin, and A. H. Buchanan. 2010. “Global response of a two storey Pres-Lam timber building.” In Proc., 2010 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conf. Christrchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Qiu, C., and S. Zhu. 2017. “Shake table test and numerical study of self-centering steel frame with SMA braces.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (1): 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2777.
Schwarze, R., M. Braun, W. Seim, P. Krooβ, M. Vollmer, and T. Niendorf. 2022. “Application and potential of shape memory alloys for dowel-type connections in timber structures.” Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 (6): 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2021.1920625.
Smith, I., and G. Foliente. 2002. “Load and resistance factor design of timber joints: International practice and future direction.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (1): 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(48).
Song, G., N. Ma, and H. N. Li. 2006. “Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures.” Eng. Struct. 28 (9): 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010.
Viau, C., and G. Doudak. 2021. “Behavior and modeling of glulam beams with bolted connections subjected to shock tube–simulated blast loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (1): 04020305. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002876.
Wang, W., C. Fang, and J. Liu. 2017. “Self-centering beam-to-column connections with combined superelastic SMA bolts and steel angles.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001675.
Xie, Q., L. Zhang, W. Zhou, L. Wang, and T. Zhou. 2019. “Cyclical behavior of timber mortise-tenon joints strengthened with shape memory alloy: experiments and moment-rotation model.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 13 (8): 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1501116.
Xie, Q., L. Zhang, Z. Zhou, and S. Li. 2020. “Lateral behavior of traditional Chinese timber-frames strengthened with shape-memory alloy: Experiments and analytical model.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (6): 04020083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002583.
Yasumura, M., and N. Kawai. 1998. “Estimating seismic performance of wood-framed structures.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 5th World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 564–571. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL Press.
Yousef-Beik, S. M. M., P. Zarnani, H. Bagheri, A. Hashemi, and P. Quenneville. 2019. “Damage-avoidance timber brace using a self-centring friction damper.” In Proc., Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Christrchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38 • Issue 5 • October 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 3, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jun 28, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Building materials
- Connections (structural)
- Construction engineering
- Construction methods
- Continuum mechanics
- Deformation (mechanics)
- Ductility
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Engineering mechanics
- Fastening
- Frames
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Mechanical properties
- Solid mechanics
- Structural behavior
- Structural engineering
- Structural mechanics
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Wood and wood products
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.