Bending Stiffness and Load–Deflection Response Prediction of Mass Timber Panel–Concrete Composite Floor System with Mechanical Connectors
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 5
Abstract
Mass timber panel–concrete (MTPC) composite floor systems are currently the preferred choice of designers for multistory modern mass timber construction. An analytical model for one-way-acting composite panels has been developed to predict the effective bending stiffness and load–deflection response of MTPC composite floor systems by considering the elastic-plastic behavior of interlayer connectors and the presence of a soft acoustic layer between concrete and timber. One-way-acting composite floor panels were tested under four-point bending and vibration with various configurations to validate the developed stiffness prediction model and investigate the influence of different parameters. The experiments showed that the model can predict the effective bending stiffness of MTPC composite systems within 10% of the bending test values in the elastic range and 14% of the modal test results. The so-called gamma method, commonly used for designing composite systems, provides predictions within 12% of the test bending stiffness, on average. Although both the gamma and proposed methods yield similar results, the proposed method is more comprehensive and less restrictive in terms of the underlying assumptions that underpin the method. The proposed model is also capable of predicting the postyielding load–deflection response of the composite system. A comparison of the predicted and tested load–deflection responses indicates a reasonable agreement between the two, although the predicted effective bending stiffness tends to be higher. The predictive capability of the model for the postyielding response can be further improved by considering the influence of cracking in concrete slabs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appears in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the financial support of this study under the Industrial Research Chair Program. Financial support was also provided by Landmark Group of Companies, FPInnovations, Canadian Wood Council, MTC Solutions, Rotho Blaas, Western Archrib, Pinkwood Ltd., and Alberta Innovates. In addition, Rotho Blaas, Nordic Structures, and Western Archrib provided test materials for the test program. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to the technicians of I. F. Morrison Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Alberta, for their assistance in the test program.
References
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM C469/C469M-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. ASTM D198-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard specification for establishing and monitoring structural capacities of prefabricated wood I-joists. ASTM D5055-19e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barrett, J. D., and W. Lau. 1994. Canadian lumber properties. Ottawa: Canadian Wood Council.
Ceccotti, A. 2002. “Composite concrete-timber structures.” Struct. Eng. Mater. 4 (3): 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.126.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2009. Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures. Part 1-1: General-common rules and rules for buildings. EN 1995-1-1. Brussels: CEN.
Chopra, A. 2012. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). 2018. Design of timber-concrete composite structures. Aachen, Germany: COST.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Engineering design in wood. CSA O86:19. Toronto: CSA.
Cuerrier-Auclair, S. 2020. Design guide for timber-concrete composite floors in Canada. : FPInnovations.
Cuerrier-Auclair, S., L. Sorelli, and A. Salenikovich. 2016. “Simplified nonlinear model for timber-concrete composite beams.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 117 (Oct): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.019.
ETA (European Technical Assessment). 2016. Rothoblaas self-tapping screws. Danmark: ETA.
Lukaszewska, E., H. Johnsson, and M. Fragiacomo. 2008. “Performance of connections for prefabricated timber-concrete composite floors.” Mater. Struct. 41 (9): 1533–1550. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9346-6.
Mirdad, M. A. H. 2020. “Structural performance of mass timber panel-concrete (MTPC) composite floor system with inclined self-tapping screws and an insulation layer.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta.
Mirdad, M. A. H., and Y. H. Chui. 2018. Behaviour of mass timber panel-concrete connections with inclined self-tapping screws and insulation layer. Seoul: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Mirdad, M. A. H., and Y. H. Chui. 2019. “Load-slip performance of mass timber panel-concrete (MTPC) composite connection with self-tapping screws and insulation layer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 213 (Jul): 696–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.117.
Mirdad, M. A. H., and Y. H. Chui. 2020a. “Stiffness prediction of mass timber panel-concrete (MTPC) composite connection with inclined screws and a gap.” Eng. Struct. 207 (Mar): 110215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110215.
Mirdad, M. A. H., and Y. H. Chui. 2020b. “Strength prediction of mass timber panel-concrete (MTPC) composite connection with inclined screws and a gap.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (8): 04020140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002678.
Mirdad, M. A. H., Y. H. Chui, and D. Tomlinson. 2021a. “Capacity and failure mode prediction of mass timber panel-concrete composite floor system with mechanical connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (2): 04020338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002909.
Mirdad, M. A. H., H. Daneshvar, T. Joyce, and Y. H. Chui. 2021b. “Sustainability design considerations for timber-concrete composite (TCC) floor systems.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021: 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688076.
Mohler, K. 1956. Uber das Tragverhalten von Biegetragern und Druckstaben mit zusammengesetztem Querschnitt und nachgiebigen Verbindungsmitteln. Karlsruhe, Germany: Habilitation, KTH.
Nordic Structures. 2021. “Nordic X-lam cross laminated timber.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.nordic.ca/en/products/nordic-x-lam-cross-laminated-timber-clt.
RothoBlaas. 2021. “Silent floor, soundproofing foils.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.rothoblaas.com/products/soundproofing/soundproofing-layers/silent-floor.
Tommola, J., and A. Jutila. 2001. “Analysis of wood-concrete composite girder with discrete shear connectors.” In Proc., Innovative Wooden Structures and Bridges Conf. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Western Archrib. 2021. “Western Archrib product, WESTDEK.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.westernarchrib.com/products/westdek-glt.
Yeoh, D., M. Fragiacomo, M. De Franceschi, and K. Boon. 2011. “State of the art on timber-concrete composite structures: A Literature review.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (10): 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000353.
Zhang, C., and P. Gauvreau. 2014. “Timber-concrete composite systems with ductile connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (7): 04014179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001144.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 8, 2021
Accepted: Apr 12, 2021
Published online: Jul 14, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 14, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Md Abdul Hamid Mirdad, Rafid Khan, Ying Hei Chui, Analytical Procedure for Timber−Concrete Composite (TCC) System with Mechanical Connectors, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12070885, 12, 7, (885), (2022).
- Yingwei Bao, Weidong Lu, Kong Yue, Hao Zhou, Binhui Lu, Zhentao Chen, Structural performance of cross-laminated timber-concrete composite floors with inclined self-tapping screws bearing unidirectional tension-shear loads, Journal of Building Engineering, 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104653, 55, (104653), (2022).
- Md Abdul Hamid Mirdad, Arman Jucutan, Rafid Khan, Jan Niederwestberg, Ying Hei Chui, Embedment and withdrawal stiffness predictions of self-tapping screws in timber, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128394, 345, (128394), (2022).