Load Configuration and Lateral Distribution of NATO Wheeled Military Trucks for Steel I-Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper presents the lateral load distribution of various North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) wheeled military trucks on a simple-span steel I-girder bridge . The military trucks are classified into the military load classification (MLC) system. The MLC trucks demonstrate different load configurations when compared to the standard HS20 truck in terms of wheel-line spacing, number of axles, and weight. A calibrated three-dimensional finite-element analysis is conducted to examine the MLC load effects. The applicability of the AASHTO LRFD provisions is evaluated using 72 different load models. The wheel-line spacing and weight of the MLC trucks cause different flexural behavior and load distributions of the bridge when compared to those of HS20. The current AASHTO LRFD approach to determine live load distribution factors may be reasonably applicable to the MLC trucks, including approximately 20% of conservative predictions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to the first writer.
References
AASHTO. (2002). AASHTO standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th Ed., Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 4th Ed., Washington, D.C.
Amer, A., Arockiasamy, M., and Shahawy, M. (1999). “Load distribution of existing solid slab bridges based on field tests.” J. Bridge Eng., 4(3), 189–193.
ANSYS, Inc. (2008). On-line manual, Canonsburg, Pa.
Barker, R. M., and Puckett, J. A. (1997). Design of highway bridges based on AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, Wiley, New York.
Department of the Army. (2002). Military nonstandard fixed bridging (FM3-34.343), Washington, D.C.
Dicleli, M., and Erhan, S. (2008). “Effect of soil and substructure properties on live-load distribution in integral abutment bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(5), 527–539.
Dicleli, M., and Erhan, S. (2009). “Live load distribution formulas for single-span prestressed concrete integral abutment bridge girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 14(6), 472–486.
Eamon, C. D., and Nowak, A. S. (2002). “Effects of edge-stiffening elements and diaphragms on bridge resistance and load distribution.” J. Bridge Eng., 7(5), 258–266.
Fu, G., Feng, J., Dekelbab, W., Moses, F., Cohen, H., and Mertz, D. (2008). “Impact of commercial vehicle weight change on highway bridge infrastructure.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(6), 556–564.
Huang, H., Shenton, H. W., and Chajes, M. J. (2004). “Load distribution for a highly skewed bridge: Testing and analysis.” J. Bridge Eng., 9(6), 558–562.
Huo, X. S., Wasserman, E. P., and Iqbal, R. A. (2005). “Simplified method for calculating lateral distribution factors for live load shear.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(5), 544–554.
Khaloo, A. R., and Mirzabozorg, H. (2003). “Load distribution factors in simply supported skew bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 8(4), 241–244.
Kim, Y. J., Green, M. F., and Wight, R. G. (2006). “Live load distributions on an impact-damaged prestressed concrete girder bridge.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges (CD-ROM), Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal.
Kim, Y. J., Green, M. F., and Wight, R. G. (2008). “Live load distributions on an impact-damaged prestressed concrete girder bridge strengthened with prestressed CFRP sheets.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(2), 202–210.
Liu, M., Frangopol, D. F., and Kim, S. (2009). “Bridge safety evaluation based on monitored live load effects.” J. Bridge Eng., 14(4), 257–269.
Mabsout, M., Tarhini, K., Jabakhanji, R., and Awwad, E. (2004). “Wheel load distribution in simply supported concrete slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 9(2), 147–155.
Mabsout, M. E., Tarhini, K. M., Frederick, G. R., and Tayar, C. (1997). “Finite-element analysis of steel girder highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 2(3), 83–87.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (1998). “Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures.” NCHRP 406, Washington, D.C.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Standardization Agency. (2002). Standardization agreement (STANAG) 2021, 6th Ed., Brussels, Belgium.
Ray, J., and Butler, C. D. (2004). “Rapid and global bridge assessment for the military.” J. Bridge Eng., 9(6), 550–557.
Samaan, M., Sennah, K., and Kennedy, J. B. (2005). “Distribution factors for curved continuous composite box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(6), 678–692.
Schwarz, M., and Laman, J. A. (2001). “Response of prestressed concrete I-girder bridges to live load.” J. Bridge Eng., 6(1), 1–8.
Song, S. -T., Chai, Y. H., and Hida, S. E. (2003). “Live-load distribution factors for concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 8(5), 273–280.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1990). “Truck weight limits: Issues and options.” Special Rep. 225, Washington, D.C.
Waldron, C. J., Cousins, T. E., Nassar, A. J., and Gomez, J. P. (2005). “Demonstration of use of high-performance lightweight concrete in bridge superstructure in Virginia.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 19(2), 146–154.
Yousif, Z., and Hindi, R. (2007). “AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution for beam-and-slab bridges: Limitations and applicability.” J. Bridge Eng., 12(6), 765–773.
Zokaie, T., Osterkamp, T. A., and Imbsen, R. A. (1991). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” Final Rep. No. NCHRP 12-26/1, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 16, 2009
Accepted: Feb 24, 2010
Published online: Mar 4, 2010
Published in print: Nov 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.