Abstract

Large-scale tornadoes in the United States can devastate the building stock of communities, leading to long-term negative effects in recovery. Resilience research has concluded that disaster losses are a predictable result of the interactions and interdependencies of the physical environment, the social and demographic characteristics of affected communities, and the built environment. To mitigate the growing losses incurred from natural disasters, these interactions must be quantified. An econometric modeling approach combining community data with building-level recovery measurements is presented to quantify these interactions among the physical, social, and built environments. A parcel-level aerial image analysis methodology for measuring building recovery is described that was tested for a 5-year recovery time frame following the 2011 Tuscaloosa tornado. Aerial images captured at 5, 18, 25, and 58 months following the tornado are used to document recovery efforts. Resilience curves at the census-block spatial aggregation as well as the affected region in Tuscaloosa are presented. To quantify the interactions of building recovery with the physical environment, built environment, and social and demographic characteristics, a resilience rapidity model is employed to identify correlations between the measured recovery patterns and variables describing the interactions found in affected parcels. Findings are presented for three categories of community characteristics: building-exposure characteristics, such as distance to the tornado path; building characteristics, such as building age; and social characteristics, such as insurance coverage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Most of the data used in this study were obtained from the city of Tuscaloosa, which were more than accommodating to the authors and whose partnership is greatly appreciated. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the Alabama Center for Insurance Information and Research.

References

ACRE (Alabama Center for Real Estate). 2012. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, housing needs analysis. Tuscaloosa, AL: ACRE.
Bhatia, U., D. Kumar, E. Kodra, and A. R. Ganguly. 2015. “Network science based quantification of resilience demonstrated on the Indian Railways Network.” PLoS One 10 (11): e0141890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141890.
Burby, R. J. 2005. “Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters?” Nat. Hazards Rev. 6 (2): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:2(67).
Burby, R. J., P. J. May, E. E. Malizia, and J. Levine. 2000. “Building code enforcement burdens and central city decline.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 66 (2): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976095.
Cimellaro, G. P., C. Fumo, A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2008. Quantification of seismic resilience of health care facilities. MCEER Technical Rep. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct. 32 (11): 3639–3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008.
Crawford, P. S., A. Graettinger, L. Powell, S. Awondo, E. Back, and S. Spector. 2017. “Five years after the April 27, 2011, Tuscaloosa tornado: A study in community resilience.” In Proc., AEI 2017: Resilience of the Integrated Building, 758–769. Reston, VA: ASCE.
CRSI (Community Resilience System Initiative). 2011. Community Resilience System Initiative (CRSI) Steering Committee final report: A roadmap to increased community resilience. Washington, DC: Community & Regional Resilience Initiative.
Cutter, S. L., L. Barnes, M. Berry, C. Burton, E. Evans, E. Tate, and J. Webb. 2008. “A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters.” Global Environ. Change 18 (4): 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013.
DHS (Dept. of Homeland Security). 2003. HAZUS-MH MRI technical manual. Washington, DC: Dept. of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate.
Ellingwood, B., J. van de Lindt, and T. P. McAllister. 2017. “The science behind community resilience assessment: An overview of the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Gopu, V., and M. Levitan. 2012. “Best design practices for wood frame construction in tornado prone areas.” World Conference on Timber Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Graettinger, A. J., D. Grau, J. van de Lindt, and D. O. Prevatt. 2012. “GIS for the geo-referenced analysis and rapid dissemination of forensic evidence collected in the aftermath of the Tuscaloosa tornado.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012, 2170–2179. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hammitt, J. K., E. S. Belsky, J. I. Levy, and J. D. Graham. 1999. “Residential building codes, affordability, and health protection: A risk‐tradeoff approach.” Risk Anal. 19 (6): 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01126.x.
Khanduri, A. C., and G. C. Morrow. 2003. “Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (4): 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00408-7.
Kikitsu, H., and P. P. Sarkar. 2015. “Building damage, wind speed estimation, and post disaster recovery in an EF5 Tornado.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 16 (2): 04014019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000156.
Manyena, S. B. 2006. “The concept of resilience revisited.” Disasters 30 (4): 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2016. “Tornado fragility and risk assessment of an archetype masonry school building.” Eng. Struct. 128: 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.030.
Mileti, D. 1999. Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2017. “Severe weather database files.” Storm Prediction Center. Accessed November 20, 2017. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/#data.
NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Prevatt, D. O., J. W. van de Lindt, A. Graettinger, W. Coulbourne, R. Gupta, S. Pei, S. Hensen, and D. Grau. 2011. Damage study and future direction for structural design following the Tuscaloosa tornado of 2011. Project Rep. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Ramseyer, C., L. Holliday, and R. Floyd. 2016. “Enhanced residential building code for tornado safety.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (4): 04015084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000832.
Reinhold, T. A., and B. Ellingwood. 1982. Tornado damage risk assessment. Rep No. NUREG/CR-2944. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
Remmer, N. S. 1980. “The regulatory environment.” J. Archit. Educ. 33 (4): 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1980.11102613.
Simmons, K. M., P. Kovacs, and G. A. Kopp. 2015. “Tornado damage mitigation: Benefit–cost analysis of enhanced building codes in Oklahoma.” Weather Clim. Soc. 7 (2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00032.1.
Standohar-Alfano, C. D., J. W. van de Lindt, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2017. “Vertical load path failure risk analysis of residential wood-frame construction in tornadoes.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (7): 04017045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001775.
Sutley, E. J., J. W. van de Lindt, and L. Peek. 2017. “Community-level framework for seismic resilience. I: Coupling socioeconomic characteristics and engineering building systems.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 18 (3): 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000239.
Theckethil, R. 2006. “Building codes: A regulatory mechanism for reducing the vulnerability of urban areas.” J. Secur. Educ. 1 (4): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_09.
van de Lindt, J. W., S. Pei, T. Dao, A. Graettinger, D. O. Prevatt, R. Gupta, and W. Coulbourne. 2013. “Dual-objective-based tornado design philosophy.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (2): 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000622.
Zhao, D., A. P. McCoy, and J. Smoke. 2015. “Resilient built environment: New framework for assessing the residential construction market.” J. Archit. Eng. 21 (4): B4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000177.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 25Issue 2June 2019

History

Received: Jan 5, 2018
Accepted: Dec 17, 2018
Published online: Mar 28, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 28, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, Center of Excellence for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-1447. Email: [email protected]
Alexander Hainen, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.
Sebastain Awondo, Ph.D.
Associate Researcher, Alabama Center for Insurance Information and Research, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.
Andrew Graettinger, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.
Lawrence Powell, Ph.D.
Director, Alabama Center for Insurance Information and Research, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share