Analysis of Life-Cycle Maintenance Strategies for Concrete Bridge Decks
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a project-level decision support tool for ranking maintenance scenarios for concrete bridge decks deteriorated as a result of chloride-induced corrosion. The approach is based on a mechanistic deterioration model and a probabilistic life-cycle cost analysis. The analysis includes agency and user costs of alternative maintenance scenarios and considers uncertainties in the agency cost and the corrosion rate in the deterioration model. The tool presented in this paper can be used to find the optimal condition index of a given bridge deck that minimizes life-cycle cost. Based on the results obtained on three existing bridge decks, it is shown that the total life-cycle cost (user cost plus agency cost) is a nonlinear function of the maximum tolerable condition of the deck, and that for a practical range of the relationship between total life-cycle cost and is convex.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adams, T. M., Pincheira, J. A., and Huang, Y. H. (2001). “Assessment and rehabilitation strategies/guidelines to maximize the service life of concrete structures.” Final Rep. for Wisconsin Highway Research Program No. 0092-00-17, Madison, Wis.
Babaei, K., Purvis, R. L., Clear, K. C., and Weyers, R. E. (1996). “Methodology for concrete removal, protection, and rehabilitation.” Rep. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Wilbur Smith Associates, Falls Church, Va.
Cady, P. D., and Weyers, R. E. (1992). “Predicting service life of concrete bridge decks subject to reinforcement corrosion.” Corrosion Forms and Control for Infrastructure, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., No. 1137, 328–338.
de Neufville, R. (1990). Applied systems analysis: Engineering planning and technology management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ehlen, M. A.(1999). “Life-cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 11(3), 224–230.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S.(2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Hawk, H. (2003). “Bridge life-cycle cost analysis.” NCHRP Rep. No. 483, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
McKenzie, A. (2001). “Economic analysis and special studies.” Mn/DOT Office of Investment Management, 〈http://www.oim.dot.state.mn.us/EASS/〉 (Feb. 23, 2004).
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2003). “Discount rates for cost-effectiveness, lease purchase, and related analyses.” OMB Circular No. A-94 Appendix C, 〈http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a094/a94_appx-c.html〉, Washington, D.C.
Pontis. (2001). Pontis release 4 user’s manual. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Purvis, R. L., Babaei, K., Clear, K. C., and Markow, M. J. (1994). “Life-cycle cost analysis for protection and rehabilitation of concrete bridges relatives to reinforcement corrosion.” Strategic Highway Research Program, Rep. No. SHRP-S-377, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Small, E. P., and Cooper, J.(1998). “Condition of the nation’s highway bridges—A look at the past, present, and future.” TR News, 194, 3–8.
Walls, J., and Smith, M. R. (1998). “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design.” Rep. No. FHWA-SA-98-079, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 8, 2002
Accepted: Aug 14, 2003
Published online: Apr 15, 2004
Published in print: May 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.