Asphalt Works Subcontracting Disputes in Large Construction Programs
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
Subcontracting is a common, and sometimes warranted, practice on large construction projects. However, it is also well recognized that disputes are likely to develop between subcontractors and general contractors in trying to achieve target objectives of cost, quality, and time. This paper tackles quality- and time-related disputes that are peculiar to the case of subcontracting asphalt works under a large construction program, such as that of a new airport construction. In particular, it reports on disagreements regarding the achieved thickness and surface smoothness of the constructed asphalt concrete layer, and on activity-interfacing and delay-attribution issues resulting from improper contractual and scheduling practices. Factors believed to be relevant to both classes of disputes are identified, and analyses are offered to pinpoint significant anomalies. Finally, arguments are developed and recommendations given, that reflect best industry practices whose application could help minimize the likelihood of facing such disputes in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Budwig, J. L. ( 1996). “Bituminous pavement smoothness: Statistically based approach to acceptance.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1544, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 125–134.
2.
Carr, R. I. (1993). “Cost, schedule, and time variances and integration.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(2), 245–265.
3.
Collins, R., Gulden, W., and Brown, D. R. ( 1996). “Twenty-five years of pavement smoothness specifications in Georgia.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1545, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 11–15.
4.
De La Garza, J. M., Vorster, M. C., and Parvin, C. M. (1991). “Total float traded as commodity.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(4), 716–727.
5.
Fernando, E. G. ( 1997). “Applicability of new flexible pavement smoothness specification for asphalt overlays.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1575, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 18–24.
6.
Gulden, W., Stone, J., and Richardson, D. ( 1983). “Use of response-type roughness meters for pavement acceptance in Georgia.” Transp. Res. Rec. 946, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 20–25.
7.
Halpin, D. W., and Riggs, L. S. ( 1992). Planning and analysis of construction operations, Wiley, New York.
8.
Hearne, T. M., Jr. Barbee, C. L., and Helms, L. N. ( 1996). “Asphalt rideability: Construction control with a straightedge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1543, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 81–88.
9.
Hossain, M., and Parcells, W. H., Jr. ( 1995). “Smoothness control in asphalt pavement construction: Development of specifications, implementation, and results.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 40–45.
10.
Ksaibati, K., Staigle, R., and Adkins, T. M. ( 1995). “Pavement construction smoothness specifications in the United States.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 27–32.
11.
Noureldin, A. S. ( 1997). “Quantifying the effect of pavement performance characteristics using partial derivatives.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1575, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 75–84.
12.
Palise, F., Strizki, B. J., and Weed, R. M. ( 1998). “Upgrading the asphaltic concrete specification of the New Jersey Department of Transportation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1616, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–5.
13.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. Y., and Kennedy, T. W. ( 1991). “Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction.” NAPA Educational Foundation, Lanham, Md.
14.
Scott, S. (1997). “Delay claims in U.K. contracts.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 123(3), 238–244.
15.
Semple, C., Hartman, F. T., and Jergeas, C. (1994). “Construction claims and disputes: Causes and cost time overruns.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(4), 785–795.
16.
Smith, K. L., Smith, K. D., Evans, L. D., Hoerner, T. E., Darter, M. I., and Woodstrom, J. H. ( 1997). “Smoothness specifications for pavements.” Final Rep., NCHRP Proj. 1-31, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
17.
Woodstrom, J. H. ( 1990). “Measurements, specifications, and achievement of smoothness for pavement construction.” NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 167, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
18.
Zack, J. G., Jr. (1993). “`Claimsmanship': Current perspective.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(3), 480–497.
19.
Zaghloul, S., Saeed, N. A., Al Jassim, A., and Rafi, A. M. ( 1998). “End-result specifications for warranted asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1632, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–12.
20.
Zaghloul, S. M. ( 1996). “Effect of poor workmanship and lack of smoothness testing on pavement life-cycle costs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1539, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 102–109.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15 • Issue 2 • May 2001
Pages: 62 - 67
History
Received: May 16, 2000
Published online: May 1, 2001
Published in print: May 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.