Failure Study of an Aluminum Bridge Deck Panel
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
Aluminum bridge decks may prove to be an alternative to concrete decks for improving the performance of structural bridge systems. Combining excellent corrosion resistance with extremely low density, aluminum decks can prolong surface life, facilitate the construction process, and expand rehabilitation capabilities. Reynolds Metals Company, Richmond, Va., has invested considerable resources to develop a proprietary aluminum deck system. The Virginia Department of Transportation agreed to employ the Reynolds deck system in two projects. Using Federal Highway Administration sponsorship, the Virginia Transportation Research Council initiated a study to evaluate the aluminum deck system. The first phase of this project analyzed the static response of a 2.74 × 3.66 m (9 × 12 ft) deck panel. Both service-load tests and ultimate-load tests were performed on the panel at the Turner-Fairbank Structural Laboratory. The experimental and analytical evaluation of the ultimate load static tests is the subject of this paper. The failure load and failure mechanism were predicted with great accuracy. The model data predicted panel failure at a load of 911.89 kN (205 kips) by yielding under the load patch while failure during the laboratory test occurred at a load of 872.07 kN (196.05 kips) by gross yielding underneath the load patch.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ABAQUS/standard user's manual; Version 5.6. (1996). Vol. I–III, Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Pawtucket, R.I.
2.
Dobmeier, J. M., Barton, F. W., Gomez, J. P., Massarelli, P. J., and McKeel, W. T. Jr. ( 1998). “Analytical and experimental evaluation of an aluminum bridge deck panel—Part I: Service load performance.” VTRC Rep. No. 99-R22, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va.
3.
Mazzolani, F. M. ( 1995). Aluminum alloy structures, 2nd Ed., E & FN Spon, London.
4.
Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 66(8), 12.
5.
O'Connor, D. S. ( 1995). “Review of the life cycle cost issues relating to prefabricated aluminum bridge decks.” Paper Prepared for Reynolds Metal, Richmond, Va.
6.
Sotiropoulos, S. N., and GangaRao, H. V. S. ( 1993). “Design anomalies in concrete deck-steel stringer bridges.” Rep. No. TRR 1393, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
7.
Ugural, A. C., and Fenster, S. K. ( 1981). Advanced strength and applied elasticity: The SI version, Elsevier, New York.
8.
Wolchuk, R. ( 1987). “Applications of orthotropic decks in bridge rehabilitation.” Engrg. J., 24(3), 113–121.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jun 28, 2000
Published online: May 1, 2001
Published in print: May 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.