Reliability Buffering for Construction Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 5
Abstract
Buffering is a common practice in project planning. Project managers or schedulers have used a time contingency to guarantee the completion time of either an activity or a project. This traditional buffering, however, often fails to protect the project schedule performance, resulting in an unnecessary resource idle time. To deal with this problem, reliability buffering, a simulation-based buffering strategy, is presented. Reliability buffering aims to generate a robust construction plan that protects against uncertainties by reducing the potential impact of construction changes. The effectiveness of reliability buffering is examined by simulating a dynamic project model that integrates the simulation approach with the network scheduling approach. The research results indicate that reliability buffering can help achieve a shorter project duration without driving up costs by pooling, resizing, relocating, and recharacterizing contingency buffers. A case study of bridge construction projects also demonstrates how construction projects can benefit from reliability buffering in real world settings. Although further validation is needed, reliability buffering can potentially impact the planning and control of construction projects by improving the consideration of construction feedbacks and characteristics in buffering, and serving as an input to a dynamic project model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ballard, G. ( 2000). “Phase scheduling.” LCI White Paper 7, Lean Construction Institute 〈www.leanconstruction.org〉 (Sep. 2003).
2.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. ( 1995). Proc., 1995 ARCOM Conf., Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Sheffield, England.
3.
Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. ( 1999). “Aiming for continuous flow.” LCI White Paper 3 〈www.leanconstruction.org〉 (Sep. 2003).
4.
Chua, D., and Shen, L. ( 2001). “Constraint modeling and buffer management with integrated production scheduler.” Proc., 9th Int. Group for Lean Construction Conf., Singapore.
5.
Eppinger, S., and Krishnan, V. ( 1992). “Overlapping product development activities by analysis of information transfer practice.” Working Paper 3478-92, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
6.
Ford, D., and Sterman, J. ( 1997). “Dynamic modeling of product development processes.” Working Paper 3943-97, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
7.
Goldratt, E. ( 1997). Critical chain, North River Press, Great Barrington, Mass.
8.
Hopp, J., and Spearman, M. ( 1996). Factory physics, McGraw–Hill, New York.
9.
Koskela, L. ( 1999). “Management of production in construction: A theoretical view.” Proc., IGLC-7, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
10.
Kwak, S. ( 1995). “Policy analysis of Hanford Tank Farm Operations with system dynamics approach.” Doctoral thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 34–36.
11.
Laufer, A., and Cohenca, D. (1990). “Factors affecting construction-planning outcomes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(1), 135–156.
12.
Martinez, J., and Ioannou, P. ( 1997). “State-based probabilistic scheduling using STROBOSCOPE’s CPM add-on.” Proc., 5th Construction Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 438–445.
13.
Ng, W., Khor, E., and Lee, J. (1998). “Simulation modeling and management of large basement construction project.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 12(2), 101–110.
14.
Padilla, E., and Carr, R. (1991). “Resource strategies for dynamic project management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 117(2), 279–293.
15.
Park, M., and Pena-Mora, F. (2003). “Dynamic change management for construction: Introduction, change cycle to model-based project management.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 19(3), ▪▪–▪▪.
16.
Pena-Mora, F., and Li, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning and control methodology for design build fast-track construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(1), 1–17.
17.
Pena-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning for fast-tracking building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(6), 445–456.
18.
Richardson, G. (1985). “Introduction to the system dynamics review.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 1(1), 1–3.
19.
Russell, A., and Ranasinghe, M. (1991). “Decision framework for fast-track construction: A deterministic analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 9(5), 467–479.
20.
Slaughter, E. (1998). “Models of construction innovation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(3), 226–231.
21.
Sterman, J. ( 1992). “System dynamics modeling for project management.” Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. 〈http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/〉 (Sep. 2003).
22.
Sterman, J. ( 2000). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for a complex world, McGraw–Hill, New York, 191–232.
23.
Turek, M. ( 1995). “System dynamics analysis of financial factors in nuclear power plant operations.” Masters thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 15–22.
24.
Yang, I., and Photios, G. ( 2001). “Resource-driven scheduling for repetitive projects: A pull-system approach.” Proc., 9th Int. Group for Lean Construction Conf., Singapore.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130 • Issue 5 • October 2004
Pages: 626 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.