Planning and Scheduling Highway Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents a model designed to integrate the planning and scheduling phases of highway construction projects, focusing primarily on the planning aspects. The model automatically generates the work breakdown structure (WBS) and precedence network respecting job logic and stores a list of construction operations typically encountered in highway projects. The generated network can subsequently be modified to suit the unique requirements of the project being considered. An object-oriented model is developed for planning highway construction operations. The model employs resource-driven scheduling in order to suit the repetitive nature of this class of projects. It accounts for (1) resource availability; (2) multiple preceding and succeeding activities; (3) transverse obstructions; (4) activities with varying quantities of work along the highway length; (5) the impact of inclement weather on crew productivity; and (6) the beneficial effect of the learning curve. At the core of the model is a relational database designed to store available resources and their respective unavailability periods. The model enables both: (1) activities executed by own force; and (2) activities subcontracted out. The model is incorporated in a prototype software that operates in the Microsoft Windows environment and generates schedules in both graphical and tabular formats. An example project is analyzed to demonstrate the features of the developed model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alkass, S., and Harris, F. (1991). “Development of an integrated system for planning earthwork operation in road construction.” Constr. Manage. Econom. 9, 263-289.
2.
Caterpillar performance handbook. (1997). 28th Ed., Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, Il.
3.
Chevallier, N., and Russell, A. D. (2000). “Developing a draft schedule using templates and rules.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127(5), 391–398.
4.
Chrzanowski, E., and Johnston, D. (1986). “Application of linear scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 112(4), 476-491.
5.
El-Rayes, K., and Moselhi, O. (1998). “Resource-driven scheduling of repetitive activities.” Constr. Manage. Econom. 16 433-446.
6.
El-Rayes, K., and Moselhi, O. (2001). “Impact of rainfall on the productivity of highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127(2), 125-131.
7.
Harmelink, D.J. ( 1995) “Linear scheduling model: the development of a linear scheduling model with micro computer applications for highway construction project control.” PhD thesis, lowa State Univ., Ames, lowa.
8.
Harris, F. C., and Evans, J. B. (1997). “Road construction—simulation game for site mangers.” J. Constr. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 103(3), 405-414.
9.
Hassanein, A. ( 2002). “Planning and scheduling highway construction using GIS and dynamic programming.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
10.
Herbsman, Z.J. ( 1987). “Evaluation of scheduling techniques for highway construction projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1126, Transportation Research Board, D.C., 110-120.
11.
Herbsman, Z. J., and Glagola, C. R. (1998). “Lane rental—innovative way to reduce road construction time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124(5), 411-417.
12.
Johnston, D. (1981). “Linear scheduling method for highway construction.” J. Constr. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 107(2), 247-261.
13.
Lavalin (2002). SNC-Lavalin Website, http://www.407etr./com/map_4.pdf.
14.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). ( 1970). “Principles of project scheduling and monitoring.” Synthesis of Highway Practice ♯6, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
15.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP. ( 1978). “Effect of weather on highway construction.” Synthesis of Highway Practice ♯47, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
16.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP. ( 1995). “Determination of contract time for highway construction project.” Synthesis of Highway Practice ♯215, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
17.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP. ( 1997). “Stabilization of existing subgrades to improve constructibility during interstate pavement reconstruction.” Synthesis of Highway Practice ♯247, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
18.
Oglesby, C.H., and Hicks, R.G. ( 1982). Highway engineering, 4th Ed, Wiley, New York.
19.
Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W. ( 1991). Object-oriented modelling and design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
20.
Russell, A.D., McGowan, N. (1993). “ Linear scheduling: a practical implementation.” Proc., Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, ASCE, New York, 279-286.
21.
Suhail, S. A., and Neale, R. H. (1994). “CPM/LOB: new methodology to integrate CPM and line of balance. ” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120(3), 667-684.
22.
Vorster, M.C., Beliveau, Y.J., and Bafna, T. ( 1992). “Linear scheduling and visualization.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1351, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 32-39.
23.
Vorster, M., and De La Garza, J. (1990). “Consequential equipment costs associated with lack of availability and downtime.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116(4), 656-669.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130 • Issue 5 • October 2004
Pages: 638 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.