Free access
Editorial
Nov 6, 2023

Scope and Direction of the Journal of Hydrologic Engineering: Serving the Hydrology Community and Beyond

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 1
The Journal of Hydrologic Engineering is one of the major journals published by ASCE. Under the leadership of three former editors in chief, Dr. M. Levent Kavvas (1996–2004), Dr. Vijay P. Singh (2004–2012), and Dr. Rao Govindaraju (2012–2022), the journal has experienced 27 years of growth and has become one of the major journals in the field of hydrologic science and engineering. We will continue the established practices and maintain the high standards of technical and professional quality of all contributions to the journal, and, in the meantime, endeavor to make further improvements to adapt to new changes and challenges in the field. Since 1996, the journal has published a variety of papers and covered a broad range of areas in hydrology and water resources. With the changes in society needs, community involvement, natural phenomena (e.g., climate change), and advances in technologies (e.g., advanced computing capabilities, availability of data acquisition techniques), and the development of novel approaches (e.g., artificial intelligence and soft computing approaches), the scope of the journal has been expanding over the years.

Aims and Scope

To better reflect the changes in the scope and to clarify the actual areas covered by the journal, a revised version of the aims and scope has recently been proposed and approved. The Journal of Hydrologic Engineering disseminates interdisciplinary information in the field of hydrologic science and engineering. The journal publishes original research and practical applications related to water in natural and built environments. It covers fundamental and applied hydrology and emerging areas (e.g., surface water, vadose zone, groundwater, water quality, snow/ice and glacier, urban/agricultural/forest, and coastal hydrology; hydroinformatics, ecohydrology; hydroclimatology; and sociohydrology). The journal encourages submissions utilizing analytical, numerical, probabilistic/stochastic, experimental, remote sensing, artificial intelligence (e.g., machine learning), and other data-driven approaches that advance hydrologic science and engineering practices and promote sustainable and resilient engineering solutions to real-world water and environmental problems.
The journal publishes different types of papers, mainly including technical papers, technical notes, case studies, state-of-the-art reviews, forums, and discussions. As explicitly indicated in the revised aims and scope, the journal covers not only surface water hydrology, but also subsurface hydrology (vadose zone hydrology and groundwater hydrology). More importantly, it broadly covers a variety of specialized and emerging areas of hydrology addressing environmental and water problems associated with watersheds, ecosystems, pollutants, dynamic human–water interactions, climate change, cold regions, and coastal zones, as well as land use and land cover (e.g., urban, agricultural, and forest). In addition to analytical, numerical, and statistical methodologies, laboratory/field experimental studies, and varying scale modeling endeavors, the journal also encompasses artificial intelligence (e.g., machine learning), soft computing (e.g., neural networks, evolutionary algorithms, and fuzzy logics), and other data-driven approaches. Although the scope of the journal involves ecological, environmental, agricultural, social, and other interdisciplinary topics, the related issues should be addressed from the hydrologic perspective in a published paper. Hydrologic technical content is essential to this journal.

Review Process

All members of the journal editorial board, including the editor in chief (EIC), section editors (SEs), and associate editors (AEs), endeavor to maintain high standards and make every possible effort to ensure an efficient and fair review process for all manuscripts submitted for publication. Once a manuscript passes technical check performed by ASCE journal staff, it is sent to the EIC to start the review process. Generally, the manuscript is evaluated first by the editorial board members to ensure it fits the scope of the journal. This initial stage also focuses on the overall quality of the English writing and technical content of the manuscript. This stage typically takes less than a week. If the manuscript is not ready for further peer review, it is directly declined without review mainly due to (1) being outside the scope of the journal (in this case, the editor may suggest a transfer to another ASCE journal), (2) substandard English and technical writing (if the manuscript can be potentially publishable after significant revisions, the editor may suggest “revise before review”), or (3) lack of sufficient technical content. If the editorial board members determine there are no major technical or English language usage concerns, the peer review process is initiated, and reviewers are invited. Once all reviews have been received, the AE and SE make recommendations, and the EIC submits via the Editorial Manager system the final decision, which can be accept as is, revise for re-review (or re-review by editor only), or decline (decline final or decline with encouragement to resubmit). The entire process from submission to the first decision typically takes about 2 months. If a revision is recommended, it is crucial for the authors to fully address all comments from both reviewers and the editorial board members, provide their point-by-point responses, and detail their modifications. It is helpful for the re-review process if the authors submit a separate document to show all tracked changes. The re-review process generally takes much less time. We understand that an efficient review process and timely publication of papers are important to all authors. We are planning to take special actions to reduce the processing time and minimize the rounds of review.

Editors’ Suggestions

The authors are strongly encouraged to review and follow the ASCE journal publication guidelines (https://ascelibrary.org/doi/epdf/10.1061/9780784479018.fm) and the relevant information at the ASCE Author Center (https://ascelibrary.org/author-center) when preparing their manuscripts. Depending on the technical content, the authors must select the right paper type and pay close attention to page limits, format requirements, organization of materials and sections, and all other specific requirements. The common problems frequently identified during the review process include:
1.
Paper types: Selecting the right type for a manuscript helps editors and reviewers properly evaluate the manuscript and provide relevant review comments because different paper types have dissimilar focuses, purposes, and requirements. For example, a technical paper is different from a case study. The former may involve a full-length presentation of a novel method or technique and detailed demonstration and in-depth discussions on its practical applicability to solve the related problems, while the latter may describe a method or an application, present an innovative way to solve a real-world hydrologic science and engineering problem, and demonstrate the broad implications of the study. In contrast, a technical note focuses on an original aspect of a method or an innovative technique and concisely presents preliminary results. A state-of-the-art review is also a full-length paper and requires a two-step review process. The authors first need to submit a proposal. After approval, the authors are invited to submit their full article. Authors are encouraged to refer to the ASCE journal publication guidelines for more details on the paper types and their requirements.
2.
Writing problems: The manuscript suffers from English writing (e.g., typos and grammatical mistakes) and technical writing (unclear or even mistaken technical information) problems. If such problems prevent editors/reviewers from understanding the technical content, the editors may directly decline the submission without review.
3.
Organization problems: The materials of a manuscript are not logically organized, and they are mixed up across different sections including introduction (literature review), methodology, results and discussion, and conclusions. It is particularly important to avoid generic literature reviews that fail to articulate the research gap(s) to be bridged and how the contribution aims to do so.
4.
Incomplete presentation: Some essential information [e.g., literature review and description of research gaps, objective(s) of the study, essential details of methodologies, in-depth discussion, and major conclusions and findings] is missing, unclear, and/or insufficient.
5.
Novelty and contribution: The manuscript lacks novelty, new technical content, or new contributions to the field, which are particularly important to a full-length technical paper.
6.
Broader implications: The manuscript reads like a project report. It lacks selection of publishable materials to address a well-defined science question. Instead, the manuscript is full of site-specific trivial details, lacking insightful discussion of the results and broad implications. This is a common problem for some case studies.

Your Involvement

The Journal of Hydrologic Engineering provides a forum for exchanging research ideas and findings and advancing hydrologic science and engineering for the community of hydrology and water resources. It is your journal, and your support is crucial to its success. Together with the dedicated reviewers, the editorial board members are striving to improve the service for the professional and scientific communities and the public. We encourage you to make contributions to the journal by submitting your work for publication (any paper types, from a technical paper to a case study, a technical note, a state-of-the-art review, a discussion, or a forum) and serving as a reviewer to support the review process. In addition, the journal also publishes both topic-oriented (important or emerging topics) and region-oriented (regional studies) special collections. We invite you, an expert, to propose a special collection and serve as a guest editor. Please contact us for the detailed procedures. Young professionals at the early stage of their career may also consider joining the Early Career Editorial Board (ECEB). Please refer to the editor’s note published in 2020 (Volume 25, Issue 1) for more details on this ASCE program, the qualifications, and responsibilities, and contact us for the application and selection procedure. We look forward to serving you, working with you, and listening to you.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Jun 21, 2023
Accepted: Aug 31, 2023
Published online: Nov 6, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 6, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Editor in Chief, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58108 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-0271. Email: [email protected]
Ashok Mishra, M.ASCE
Editor of Surface Water Hydrology Section, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29630.
Mohamed M. Hantush, M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-4178
Editor of Ground Water Hydrology Section, USEPA Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Cincinnati, OH 45268. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-4178

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share