Free access
Technical Breakthrough Abstracts
Jun 19, 2018

Measuring Soil-Water Density by Helium Pycnometer

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 9
Soil-water density (SWD) is the density of water retained in soil. Its value can be remarkably different from the free water density (i.e., 0.997g/cm3). SWD as high as 1.68g/cm3 has been reported (e.g., Martin 1960; Richards and Bouazza 2007; Zhang and Lu forthcoming). However, SWD is universally treated as a constant equal to the free water in defining fundamental soil properties of volumetric water content, specific surface area, pore-water pressure, and matric suction. Many research efforts have been devoted to measuring SWD and are critically reviewed in Martin (1960) and Zhang and Lu (Forthcoming). All previous methods are plagued with either unjustified assumptions or limited applicability within a certain water content range. Consequently, current knowledge on SWD greatly deviates on the magnitude and even the direction in abnormality. To date, there is still no reliable experimental method for measuring SWD as a function of water content.
Fundamentally, SWD abnormality can be interpreted from physical mechanisms of soil-water interaction (Zhang and Lu Forthcoming). At low water content, the soil-water interaction is dominated by van der Waals interaction and surface and cation hydration. These interactions are produced by attractive van der Waals forces or electrostatic hydration forces, compressing water molecules, and thereby producing a SWD higher than the free water. At high water content, the soil-water interaction is dominated by capillarity under unsaturated conditions, leading to negative pore water pressure and a SWD lower than the free water. Thus, SWD is intrinsically related to thermodynamic states of soil water and depends on water content.
In this paper, a humidity-controlled helium pycnometer method is reported to measure SWD as a function of water content. The soil samples with various water contents (i.e., soil-water mass) are first prepared by equilibrating in a humidity-controlled chamber with salt solutions. The helium pycnometer, conventionally used to determine soil’s specific gravity (e.g., Richards and Bouazza 2007), is then utilized to measure the soil sample volume. Assuming unchanged in solid density, the soil-water volume is the measured soil sample volume subtracting the solid volume. The SWD at various water contents is calculated by dividing the measured soil-water mass with the soil-water volume.
The proposed method is validated by comparing it with the buoyant force method (Bahramian et al. 2017) and is illustrated in Fig. 1(a) for Wyoming montmorillonite. The proposed method produces close matches to the buoyant force method. Fig. 1(b) illustrates the SWD results measured by the present method for three different types of soil. At low water content, the measured SWD can be as high as 1.37g/cm3 and decreases with increasing water content.
Fig. 1. Measured average soil-water density: (a) for comparison with the buoyant force method; and (b) for different types of soil.

Implications

The abnormally high SWD has shown to have significant impacts on the magnitude of a wide array of fundamental soil properties such as volumetric water content, specific surface area, pore-water pressure, and matric potential (Zhang and Lu Forthcoming). The present method provides a reliable way to measure SWD, can potentially reconcile the historical controversies on upper and lower bounds of SWD, and opens a new window to probe soil–water interaction.

References

Bahramian, Y., A. Bahramian, and A. Javadi. 2017. “Confined fluids in clay interlayers: A simple method for density and abnormal pore pressure interpretation.” Colloids Surf. A 521 (May): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.021.
Martin, R. T. 1960. “Adsorbed water on clay: A review.” Clays Clay Min. 9 (1): 28–70. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1960.0090104.
Richards, S., and A. Bouazza. 2007. “Determination of particle density using water and gas pycnometry.” Géotechnique 57 (4): 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.4.403.
Zhang, C., and N. Lu. Forthcoming. “What is the range of soil water density? Critical reviews with a unified model.” Rev. Geophys., in press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Feb 25, 2018
Accepted: Mar 9, 2018
Published online: Jun 19, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 19, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chao Zhang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401. Email: [email protected]
N. Lu, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share