Free access
Technical Breakthrough Abstracts
Jan 5, 2015

Reset of Secondary Compression Clock for Peat by Cyclic Straining

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3
Peat soils are widely recognized as being highly compressible. The virgin compression index, Cc, is often 5 to 20 times larger than for soft clay, and the secondary compression index, Cα, is in the range of (0.05 to 0.07) Cc, which is also higher than for typical clays (Mesri and Ajlouni 2007). Secondary compression is often the dominant source of volume change in peat over time. The compressibility of peat has typically been investigated due to total stress increase imposed by static loads. This paper discusses time-dependent volumetric strains due to cyclic shear straining.
A multistage cyclic simple shear laboratory testing program using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) digitally controlled direct simple shear device (Duku et al. 2007), modified for constant height testing, was used to investigate postcyclic volume change of relatively undisturbed specimens of fibrous peat from Sherman Island in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. During each stage, 15 strain-controlled cycles (1 Hz) were imposed on peat specimens while maintaining constant height by varying the vertical stress, after which specimens were reconsolidated to the initial vertical stress (σvc). Postcyclic reconsolidation was monitored for approximately 20 min following each loading stage. Odometer tests indicate primary consolidation was complete after 1 min, leaving the remaining time to record the rate of secondary compression.
Test results for a peat specimen with 55% organic content, σvc=12kPa, overconsolidation ratio (OCR) = 4.9, Cc=2.21, and Cr=0.14 are shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1(a) shows that excess pore pressure ratios (ru) are nonzero when γcyc>3%, with a residual ru=0.2 for γcyc=10%. As shown in Fig. 1(b), although these ru values are modest, postcyclic volumetric strains are significant when γcyc>1% because of the peat’s high compressibility. Fig. 1(c) shows that the secondary compression rate, which is related to the difference between εv at 1 and 20 min, increases with γcyc. This suggests that cyclic straining can increase the secondary compression rate, which has not been previously recognized. Similar increases in secondary compression rate are routinely observed when total stress is increased in laboratory odometer tests, which can be viewed as resetting the clock to zero at the time the load is applied. The data in Fig. 1 indicate that cyclic straining can at least partially reset the secondary compression clock without total stress increase.
Fig. 1. Cyclic direct simple shear test results of Sherman Island peat: (a) pore pressure ratio (ru) versus number of cycles (N); (b) volumetric strain (εv) versus time (t); (c) εv versus cyclic shear strain amplitude (γcyc)

Implications

Seismic risk is a significant issue for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta because levees are composed of saturated, often liquefiable soils that rest atop soft compressible peats and organic soils. If seismic ground failure were to occur in or beneath a levee, the interior islands could flood. If repeated over a sufficient number of islands, this process would likely draw saline water into the delta from the San Francisco Bay, compromising fresh water delivery via several of California’s major aqueduct systems.
Liquefaction of saturated loose cohesionless levee fill and foundation soil is recognized as a significant driver of ground failure risk in the delta. This paper identifies a new mechanism by which levees that do not fail during shaking may experience increased settlement rates due to secondary compression following an earthquake, possibly causing overtopping. Further study is required to better characterize this potential hazard. Although γcyc as high as 10% is considered very large for typical inorganic soils, the delta peats are unusually soft and such large shear strains are feasible during design-level shaking.

Acknowledgments

Support for this research has been provided by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) under contract number 4600010406, and the U.S. Geological Survey under contract number G11AP20169.

References

Duku, P. M., Stewart, J. P., Whang, D. H., and Venugopal, R. (2007). “Digitally controlled simple shear apparatus for dynamic soil testing.” Geotech. Test. J., 30(5), 368–377.
Mesri, G., and Ajlouni, M. (2007). “Engineering properties of fibrous peats.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(7), 850–866.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141Issue 3March 2015

History

Received: Sep 5, 2014
Accepted: Dec 12, 2014
Published online: Jan 5, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Shafiee, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Jonathan P. Stewart, F.ASCE
Professor and Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Scott J. Brandenberg, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor and Vice Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share