Free access
Technical Breakthrough Abstract
Dec 8, 2014

New Method for Improvement of Rockfill Material with Polyurethane Foam Adhesive

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 2
External factors, such as earthquakes or changes in water level, can reduce the safety factor for rockfill dams. Hence, the material in the slope and upper part of a high rockfill dam should be reinforced or strengthened. One way to do this is to use geogrid or rebar mesh to reinforce the rockfill. However, this method may cause difficulties during construction, especially for roller-compacted materials. Another method is to use Portland cement to strengthen the rockfill. However, this method may cause materials in the upper part of the dam to be stiffer than materials in the lower part of the dam, which may lead to differential displacements and cracking. Thus, cement stabilization is undesirable from this standpoint.
A new soil-improvement method that employs polyurethane foam adhesive (PFA) is proposed for rockfill materials. An experimental program of large-scale drained triaxial compression tests was conducted to investigate the strength and deformation behavior of PFA-improved rockfill. The rockfill material had particle sizes ranging from 0.1 to 20 mm and was classified as well-graded gravel (GM) according to ASTM (2006). Specimens with a height of 200 mm and a diameter of 100 mm were prepared by mixing the rockfill material with 8% PFA by weight percentage (Wp). The mixed material was divided into five equal parts for compaction inside a split mold. The effective confining stresses for the tests were 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 MPa, and the specimens were saturated using the vacuum method (B-value>0.96). The tests were performed at a constant axial displacement rate of 0.6mm/min and discontinued at 30% axial strain. Corresponding tests were performed without PFA admixture for comparison.
Shear strength envelopes for the unimproved and PFA-improved rockfill materials are presented in Fig. 1. The envelope for the unimproved rockfill is approximately linear over a large effective stress range and passes through the origin (c=0, ϕ=40.4°). The envelope for the PFA-improved rockfill is parallel and indicates a cohesion intercept (c=0.32MPa, ϕ=40.4°). Thus, the effect of the PFA admixture is to add significant cohesive strength to the material. Fig. 2 shows photographs of unimproved and PFA-improved rockfill specimens after testing for a confining pressure of 0.3 MPa. The unimproved material exhibited contractive behavior during shear, whereas the improved material exhibited expansive behavior and a bulging failure mode. The PFA-improved rockfill material has good ductility for 6%<Wp<10%. The material exhibits brittle deformations for Wp>10% and lower cohesion for Wp<6%.
Fig. 1. Shear strength of unimproved and PFA-improved rockfill materials
Fig. 2. Final deformation of unimproved and PFA-improved rockfill specimens in triaxial shear: (a) Wp=0%; (b) Wp=8%

Implications

Large-scale triaxial tests have indicated that PFA admixture increases the cohesive strength of rockfill material over a large effective stress range and can provide good ductility. Further studies are needed to confirm field performance for applications such as rockfill dams. The use of the PFA-improved rockfill for dam construction is expected to be more cost-effective than geogrid reinforcement or cement stabilization methods.

References

ASTM. (2006). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).” D2487-06, West Conshohocken, PA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141Issue 2February 2015

History

Received: Sep 15, 2014
Accepted: Oct 24, 2014
Published online: Dec 8, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Discussion open until: May 8, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yang Xiao, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400450, China; and Researcher, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210098, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hanlong Liu [email protected]
Professor and Chair, College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400450, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Chandrakant S. Desai, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Regents’ Professor (Emeritus), Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share