Erratum for “Fatigue and Flexural Behavior of Reinforced-Concrete Beams Strengthened with Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix” by Zena R. Aljazaeri and John J. Myers
You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLEPublication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 21, Issue 6
Please note the following corrections for Table 1 of the original paper:
•
The units associated with the uncracked and cracked specimens’ modulus of elasticity should be in GPa instead of MPa;
•
The mean of the uncracked specimen’s modulus of elasticity should be changed from 1,360 (197) to 1,360 (197,000), and the mean of the cracked specimen’s modulus of elasticity should be changed from 127 (18.4) to 127 (18,400); and
•
The mean for fiber area by unit width should be changed from 0.006 to 0.123 (0.005).
| Mechanical property | Symbol | Mean results |
|---|---|---|
| PBO property (Ruredil Company) | ||
| Ultimate tensile stress in main direction [ ()] | 2,640 (1,947) | |
| Ultimate tensile stress in the secondary direction [ ()] | 665 (490) | |
| FRCM laboratory-tested property | ||
| Uncracked specimen’s modulus of elasticity [GPa (ksi)] | 1,360 (197,000) | |
| Cracked specimen’s modulus of elasticity [GPa (ksi)] | 127 (18,400) | |
| Ultimate tensile strength [MPa (ksi)] | 1,200 (174) | |
| Ultimate tensile strain [ ()] | 0.007 (0.007) | |
| Fiber area by unit width [ ()] | 0.123 (0.005) | |
The correct Table 1 is provided herein.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 21 • Issue 6 • December 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2017
Accepted: May 26, 2017
Published online: Aug 24, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jan 24, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.