Technical Papers
Jan 18, 2023

Effects of Ground Motion Incident Angle on Inelastic Seismic Demands of Skewed Bridges Subjected to Mainshock–Aftershock Sequences

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

Several aftershocks can occur after a strong mainshock and lead to additional structural damage. The investigation of the seismic response of bridges is more challenging when the effects of incident angles of mainshocks and subsequent aftershocks are considered. This study investigates the effects of the ground motion incident angle on the nonlinear structural responses of skewed bridge structures against mainshock–aftershock sequences. For this objective, the seismic performance of a 60° skewed bridge located in San Fernando, California, is examined under real bidirectional mainshock–aftershock sequences. In this study, ground motion directionality effects were investigated considering the relative difference between mainshock and corresponding aftershock incident angles. The results showed that taking into account the incident angles of both mainshock and the corresponding aftershock can significantly affect the seismic performance of skew bridges. In particular, when the difference between the angles of the mainshock and corresponding aftershock was considered, the nonlinear responses of the case study increased up to 65.56%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Alessandri, S., R. Giannini, and F. Paolacci. 2013. “Aftershock risk assessment and the decision to open traffic on bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (15): 2255–2275. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2324.
Amadio, C., M. Fragiacomo, and S. Rajgelj. 2003. “The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (2): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.225.
Amiri, S., and E. Bojórquez. 2019. “Residual displacement ratios of structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 121 (Jun): 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.021.
Amiri, S., L. Di Sarno, and A. Garakaninezhad. 2021a. “On the aftershock polarity to assess residual displacement demands.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 150 (Nov): 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106932.
Amiri, S., A. Garakaninezhad, and E. Bojórquez. 2021b. “Normalized residual displacement spectra for post-mainshock assessment of structures subjected to aftershocks.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 20 (2): 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2028-5.
Amjadian, M., A. Kalantari, and A. K. Agrawal. 2016. “Analytical study of the coupled motions of decks in skew bridges with the deck–abutment collision.” J. Vib. Control 24 (7): 1300–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316659781.
Apirakvorapinit, P., J. Mohammadi, and J. Shen. 2012. “Analytical investigation of potential seismic damage to a skewed bridge.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 17 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000094.
Archila, M., C. E. Ventura, and W. Liam Finn. 2017. “New insights on effects of directionality and duration of near-field ground motions on seismic response of tall buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 26 (11): e1363. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1363.
Athanatopoulou, A. 2005. “Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components.” Eng. Struct. 27 (2): 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.011.
Bauschinger, J. 1887. “Variations in the elastic limit of iron and steel.” J. Iron Steel Inst. 12 (1): 442–444.
Belleri, A., E. Brunesi, R. Nascimbene, M. Pagani, and P. Riva. 2015. “Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5): 04014135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000617.
Bhatnagar, U. R., and S. Banerjee. 2015. “Fragility of skewed bridges under orthogonal seismic ground motions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (9): 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.936880.
Bosio, M., C. Di Salvatore, D. Bellotti, L. Capacci, A. Belleri, V. Piccolo, F. Cavalieri, B. D. Lago, P. Riva, and G. Magliulo. 2022. “Modelling and seismic response analysis of non-residential single-storey existing precast buildings in Italy.” J. Earthquake Eng. (Jan): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2033364.
Caltrans, S. D. C. 2010. Caltrans seismic design criteria version 1.6. Sacramento, CA: California DOT.
Casapulla, C., E. Mousavian, and M. Zarghani. 2019. “A digital tool to design structurally feasible semi-circular masonry arches composed of interlocking blocks.” Comput. Struct. 221 (Sep): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.05.001.
Di Sarno, L. 2013. “Effects of multiple earthquakes on inelastic structural response.” Eng. Struct. 56 (Nov): 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.041.
Di Sarno, L., and S. Amiri. 2019. “Period elongation of deteriorating structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences.” Eng. Struct. 196 (Oct): 109341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109341.
Di Sarno, L., S. Amiri, and A. Garakaninezhad. 2020. “Effects of incident angles of earthquake sequences on seismic demands of structures.” Structures 28 (Dec): 1244–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.064.
Feng, R., X. Wang, W. Yuan, and J. Yu. 2018. “Impact of seismic excitation direction on the fragility analysis of horizontally curved concrete bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (10): 4705–4733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0400-2.
Forgács, T., V. Sarhosis, and K. Bagi. 2017. “Minimum thickness of semi-circular skewed masonry arches.” Eng. Struct. 140 (Jun): 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.036.
Fragiacomo, M., C. Amadio, and L. Macorini. 2004. “Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 26 (13): 2021–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.08.005.
Franchin, P., and P. E. Pinto. 2009. “Allowing traffic over mainshock-damaged bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (5): 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802421326.
Ghobarah, A. A., and W. K. Tso. 1973. “Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2 (3): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020304.
Goda, K., and M. R. Salami. 2014. “Inelastic seismic demand estimation of wood-frame houses subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (2): 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9534-4.
Goda, K., and C. A. Taylor. 2012. “Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (15): 2311–2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2188.
Grossi, P., C. Williams, C. Cabrera, T. Tabucchi, P. Sarabandi, A. Rodriguez, H. Aslani, and M. Rahnama. 2011. The 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake: lessons and future challenges. Newark, CA: Risk Management Solutions.
Han, R., Y. Li, and J. van de Lindt. 2014. “Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock–aftershock sequences.” Struct. Saf. 50 (Sep): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.010.
Hatzigeorgiou, G. D. 2010. “Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes.” Comput. Struct. 88 (5–6): 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.006.
Hatzivassiliou, M., and G. D. Hatzigeorgiou. 2015. “Seismic sequence effects on three-dimensional reinforced concrete buildings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 72 (May): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.005.
Jennings, P. C., and G. W. Housner. 1971. Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology.
Jong-Su, J., D. Reginald, L. N. Lowes, and B. Ioannis. 2015. “Framework of aftershock fragility assessment–case studies: Older California reinforced concrete building frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2617–2636. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2599.
Kalateh-Ahani, M., and S. Amiri. 2021. “A Park-Ang damage index-based framework for post-mainshock structural safety assessment.” Structures 33 (Oct): 820–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.039.
Li, Y., R. Song, and J. Van De Lindt. 2014. “Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (12): 04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019.
Marco, G. D. A., P. Maria, K. J. Elwood, B. S. Majid, and P. Andrea. 2017. “Aftershock collapse fragility curves for non-ductile RC buildings: A scenario-based assessment.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (13): 2083–2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2894.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, G. L. Fenves, and B. Jeremic. 2013. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees), Command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Vol. 13 of Proc., Symp. on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 15–22. Lisbon: IABSE.
Meng, J.-Y., and E. M. Lui. 2002. “Refined stick model for dynamic analysis of skew highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (3): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:3(184).
Mousavian, E., K. Bagi, and C. Casapulla. 2022. “Interlocking joint shape optimization for structurally informed design of block assemblages.” J. Comput. Des. Eng. 9 (4): 1279–1297. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwac054.
Park, R., M. J. N. Priestley, and W. D. Gill. 1982. “Ductility of square confined concrete columns.” J. Struct. Div. ASCE 108 (4): 929–950. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005933.
Paterson, E., D. D. Re, and Z. Wang. 2008. The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: Risk management lessons and implications. Newark, CA: Risk Management Solutions.
PEER, P. 2013. NGA-West2 database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Perrone, D., P. Calvi, R. Nascimbene, E. Fischer, and G. Magliulo. 2019. “Seismic performance of non-structural elements during the 2016 central Italy earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (10): 5655–5677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0361-5.
Raghunandan, M., A. B. Liel, and N. Luco. 2015. “Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (3): 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2478.
Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones. 1994. “Earthquake aftershocks: Update.” Science 265 (5176): 1251–1252. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5176.1251.
Rezaei, H., S. Arabestani, R. Akbari, and E. Noroozinejad Farsangi. 2022. “The effects of earthquake incidence angle on the seismic fragility of reinforced concrete box-girder bridges of unequal pier heights.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 (2): 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1842467.
Rigato, A. B., and R. A. Medina. 2007. “Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 29 (10): 2593–2601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.008.
Rodriguez, A. F., K. R. Mackie, and M. H. Scott. 2022. “Consistent software-specific nonlinear dynamic response of highway bridges.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 27 (2): 04022003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000682.
Ruiz-García, J., and J. C. Negrete-Manriquez. 2011. “Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.021.
Santarsiero, G., L. Di Sarno, S. Giovinazzi, A. Masi, E. Cosenza, and S. Biondi. 2018. “Performance of the healthcare facilities during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (10): 5701–5727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0330-z.
Shi, F., G. Saygili, O. E. Ozbulut, and Y. Zhou. 2020. “Risk-based mainshock-aftershock performance assessment of SMA braced steel frames.” Eng. Struct. 212 (Jun): 110506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110506.
Shokrabadi, M., and H. V. Burton. 2018. “Risk-based assessment of aftershock and mainshock-aftershock seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames.” Struct. Saf. 73 (Jul): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.03.003.
Song, R., Y. Li, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2014. “Impact of earthquake ground motion characteristics on collapse risk of post-mainshock buildings considering aftershocks.” Eng. Struct. 81 (Dec): 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.047.
Taskari, O., and A. Sextos. 2015. “Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (13): 2281–2301. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2584.
Torbol, M., and M. Shinozuka. 2012. “Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (14): 2111–2124. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2197.
USGS. 2011. “Magnitude 9.1—Near the east coast of Honshu, Japan. United States Geological Survey.” Accessed February 1, 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20110311054624120_30#executive.
USGS. 2012. “Magnitude 8.6—Off the west coast of Northern Sumatra. United States Geological Survey.” Accessed February 1, 2022. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20120411083836720_20#executive.
van de Lindt, J. W. 2008. “Experimental investigation of the effect of multiple earthquakes on woodframe structural integrity.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 13 (3): 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(111).
Yeo, G. L., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance based earthquake engineering. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ.
Yukutake, Y., and Y. Iio. 2017. “Why do aftershocks occur? Relationship between mainshock rupture and aftershock sequence based on highly resolved hypocenter and focal mechanism distributions.” Earth Planets Space 69 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0650-2.
Zhai, C.-H., W.-P. Wen, S. Li, and L.-L. Xie. 2015. “The ductility-based strength reduction factor for the mainshock–aftershock sequence-type ground motions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (10): 2893–2914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9744-z.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted: Nov 15, 2022
Published online: Jan 18, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 18, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alireza Garakaninezhad [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Jiroft, Jiroft, Kerman 7867155311, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Saeed Amiri [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Earthquake and Geotechnical Engineering, Graduate Univ. of Advanced Technology, Kerman 7631885356, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2790-526X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seismic Performance of Buildings Equipped with Four-Joint Rotational Friction Dampers in Mainshock–Aftershock Sequences, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12980, 150, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share