Technical Papers
Nov 24, 2022

Application of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Determine the Appropriate Policy for Maintenance of Buildings in Karaj City, Iran

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 1

Abstract

Maintenance operations embrace all parts of the building, such as structural and architectural parts, mechanical and electrical installations, and how they are serviced, including the most detailed to the most sensitive components in the building. This research uses the Delphi method and prepares a questionnaire with the construction industry experts’ opinions to determine the main criteria. The purpose of this article is to identify and prioritize the effective indicators for the building maintenance system and determine the most appropriate strategy for this system using multicriteria decision making methods. The proposed method first calculates the weight of the indicators and then prioritizes the indicators based on fuzzy and nonfuzzy multicriteria decision-making methods. Finally, the final rankings of the indices were calculated using the mean rank and final ranking methods. According to the review of all methods, it was found that safety, health and accessibility indices are the first to third priorities, respectively. Finally, by examining the results obtained from a case study (Karaj City, Iran) and examining the experts’ opinions, it was found that the obtained results are different and the corrective maintenance (CM) and breakdown maintenance (BM) strategies are the most appropriate.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of the present study are available within the article. Some data, used during the study were provided by the researchers themselves by preparing a questionnaire and taking the opinion of experts in construction. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

Ashaf, D. H., S. W. Hidayat, and A. Ahmadi. 2019. “Decision support system determines the purchase of house right using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and Borda methods.” J. ASRO 10 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37875/asro.v10i1.85.
Bashiri, M., H. Badri, and T. H. Hejazi. 2011. “Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method.” Appl. Math. Modell. 35 (1): 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.05.014.
Choudhary, D., and R. Shankar. 2012. “An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India.” Energy 42 (1): 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.010.
Das, K., R. S. Lashkari, and S. Sengupta. 2007. “Machine reliability and preventive maintenance planning for cellular manufacturing systems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183 (1): 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.079.
Dejaco, M. C., F. R. Cecconi, and S. Maltese. 2017. “Key performance indicators for building condition assessment.” J. Build. Eng. 9 (Jan): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.11.004.
Diakoulaki, D., and F. Karangelis. 2007. “Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 11 (4): 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.06.007.
Es-haghi, M. S., M. S. Barkhordari, Z. Huang, and J. Ye. 2022. “Multicriteria decision-making methods in selecting seismic upgrading strategy of high-rise RC wall buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (4): 04022015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003304.
Fouladgar, M. M., A. Yazdani-Chamzini, A. Lashgari, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2012. “Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment.” Int. J. Strategic Property Manage. 16 (1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2012.666657.
Golroo, A., A. Fani, H. Naseri, and S. A. MirHassani. 2021. “Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation planning considering budget uncertainty.” [In Farsi.] Amir Kabir J. Civ. Eng. 53 (7): 609–612. https://doi.org/10.22060/CEEJ.2020.17502.6583.
Gumus, A. T. 2009. “Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two steps fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2): 4067–4074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.013.
Habibi, A., A. Izdiyar, and A. Sarafrazi. 2014. Fuzzy multi criteria decision making. Rasht, Iran: Gilles Inscription.
Häder, M., and S. Häder. 1995. “Delphi und kognitionspsychologie: Ein zugang zur theoretischen fundierung der Delphi-methode.” ZUMA Nachrichten. 19 (37): 8–34.
Hosseini Firouz, M., and N. Ghadimi. 2016. “Optimal preventive maintenance policy for electric power distribution systems based on the fuzzy AHP methods.” Complexity 21 (6): 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21668.
Hsieh, T. Y., S. T. Lu, and G. H. Tzeng. 2004. “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (7): 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002.
Hwang, C. L., and K. Yoon. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making, 58–191. Berlin: Springer.
Ilangkumaran, M., and S. Kumanan. 2009. “Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multiple criteria decision making approach.” J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 20 (7): 1009–1022. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380910984258.
Karabašević, D., D. Stanujkić, and S. Urošević. 2015. “The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA and ARAS methods.” Management 20 (77): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2015.0029.
Kelly, A. 2006. Managing maintenance resources. 1st ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Keršuliene, V., E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2010. “Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA).” J. Bus. Econ. Manage. 11 (2): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
Keršuliene, V., E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis. 2011. “Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection.” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 17 (4): 645–666. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.635718.
Kheradranjbar, M., M. A. Mohammadi, and S. Rafiee. 2021. “Evaluating the efficiency of building repair and maintenance system using data envelopment analysis method.” [In Farsi.] JSCE 8 (4): 252–269. https://doi.org/10.22065/JSCE.2021.274367.2377.
Kheradranjbar, M., M. A. Mohammadi, and S. Rafiee. 2022. “Prioritize building maintenance system strategies using a combination of multi-criteria decision making methods.” [In Farsi.] JSCE. https://doi.org/10.22065/JSCE.2022.311579.2611.
Khodayari, M., and S. Abdollahzadeh. 2018. “An approach to determine appropriate multi-product maintenance policies using multi-criteria simulation and decision making.” [In Farsi.] Ind. Manage. 10 (2): 279–296. https://doi.org/10.22059/IMJ.2018.248555.1007365.
Lawshe, C. H. 1975. “A quantitative approach to content validity.” Personnel Psychol. 28 (4): 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
Lee, A. H., W. C. Chen, and C. J. Chang. 2008. “A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan.” Expert Syst. Appl. 34 (1): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022.
Liu, J., Y. Zhang, and B. Song. 2019. “Reliability and maintenance modeling for competing failures with intermission considered.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 233 (5): 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022.
Maleki, I., L. Ebrahimi, S. Jodati, and I. Ramesh. 2014. “Analysis of software cost estimation using fuzzy logic.” Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. Technol. 4 (3): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfcst.2014.4303.
Martin, Z., B. Tognetti, and H. Hill. 2016. “Navigating historic to present US model code provisions for the repair of damaged buildings.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 21 (1): 04015013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000265.
Martinod, R. M., O. Bistorin, L. F. Castañeda, and N. Rezg. 2018. “Maintenance policy optimisation for multi-component systems considering degradation of components and imperfect maintenance actions.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 124 (Oct): 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.019.
Moriconi, G., and T. R. Naik. 2010. “Monitoring system to provide assurance for maintenance of structures.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 15 (1): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000019.
Moubray, J. 2001. Reliability-centered maintenance. South Norwalk, CT: Industrial Press Inc.
National Construction Regulations of Iran. 2013. The twenty-second topic of the national building regulations, building care and maintenance. Tehran: Iran Development Publishing House.
Nosrati Nahook, H., and M. Eftekhari. 2013. “A new method for feature selection based on fuzzy logic.” Comput. Intell. Electr. Eng. 4 (1): 71–84.
Nzukam, C., A. Voisin, E. Levrat, D. Sauter, and B. Iung. 2017. “A dynamic maintenance decision approach based on maintenance action grouping for HVAC maintenance costs savings in non-residential buildings.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 50 (1): 13722–13727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2551.
Opricovic, S., and G. H. Tzeng. 2004. “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156 (2): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting. Resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publication.
Santoyo-Castelazo, E., and A. Azapagic. 2014. “Sustainability assessment of energy systems: Integrating environmental, economic and social aspects.” J. Cleaner Prod. 80 (Oct): 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061.
Shafiee, M. 2015. “Maintenance strategy selection problem: An MCDM overview.” J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 21 (4): 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-09-2013-0063.
Shi, H., and J. Zeng. 2016. “Real-time prediction of remaining useful life and preventive opportunistic maintenance strategy for multi-component systems considering stochastic dependence.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 (Mar): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.016.
Stanujkic, D., D. Karabasevic, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2015. “A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method.” Eng. Econ. 26 (2): 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.2.8820.
Stanujkic, D., D. Karabasevic, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2017. “A new approach for selecting alternatives based on the adapted weighted sum and the SWARA methods: A case of personnel selection.” Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 51 (3): 39–56.
Taber, K. S. 2018. “The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education.” Res. Sci. Educ. 48 (6): 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and J. D. Sorensen. 1987. “Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems.” Civ. Eng. Syst. 4 (2): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02630258708970464.
Turoff, M., and H. A. Linstone. 2002. The Delphi method-techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub.
Urosevic, S., D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, and M. Maksimovic. 2017. “An approach to personnel selection in the tourism industry based on the SWARA and the WASPAS methods.” Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 51 (1): 75–88.
Wang, L., J. Chu, and J. Wu. 2007. “Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107 (1): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005.
Yau, Y. 2012. “Multicriteria decision making for homeowners’ participation in building maintenance.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (2): 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000108.
Yıldız, S., S. Kivrak, and G. Arslan. 2017. “Factors affecting environmental sustainability of urban renewal projects.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 34 (3–4): 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511211226166.
Zaim, S., A. Turkyılmaz, M. F. Acar, U. Al-Turki, and O. F. Demirel. 2012. “Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: A case study.” J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 18 (1): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511211226166.
Zarbakhshnia, N., H. Soleimani, and H. Ghaderi. 2018. “Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria.” Appl. Soft Comput. 65 (Apr): 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Nov 26, 2021
Accepted: Sep 7, 2022
Published online: Nov 24, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 24, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Karaj Branch, Karaj 31499-68111, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-9400. Email: [email protected]
Mirali Mohammadi [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia Univ., P.O. Box 165, Urmia 57561-15311, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Shahin Rafiee [email protected]
Professor, Mechanical Engineering of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Univ. College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Univ. of Tehran, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share