Technical Papers
Dec 15, 2022

Decoupling Urban Water Use from Population Growth in the Colorado River Basin

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149, Issue 2

Abstract

Decreases in river flows and rapidly declining reservoir levels pose grave water security risks to urban water utilities reliant upon the Colorado River Basin. This study evaluated multidecadal trends (2000–2020) in urban water use for 28 utilities with a combined service population of 23 million people that depend in part or wholly upon water supplies from the river and its tributaries. It was found that more than half of cities surveyed have substantially decoupled their water demands from population growth by greatly reducing their per capita water use. Total water deliveries to the cities surveyed dropped by 18% even though their combined service population increased by 24%. Median per capita water-use rates for total and residential use decreased by 30% and 28%, respectively. The most common water conservation strategies included toilet replacement rebates and other plumbing retrofits, variable water-pricing structures, and turf removal. Given considerable variability in total per capita water use and rate of per capita reductions, many cities should be able to substantially reduce water demands to attain the per capita water-use levels of top performers. In contrast with overall declines in water use, utilization of the Colorado River Basin as a water source has not declined but instead increased by 1%. These results suggest that opportunity may exist for reducing pressure on the Colorado River Basin if per capita water-use rates continue to decline and utilities increase their use of other water sources—including water reuse, desalination, and stormwater capture as well as other rivers and aquifers—that can be prioritized over the use of Colorado River supplies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

Thirty-nine individuals were involved in gathering data for this study, primarily from the University of Virginia. I am most grateful for their efforts. Forty-five staff from water utilities provided data. I am particularly indebted to Kyle Miller of the Arizona Department of Water Resources, who provided complete data sets for all 11 Arizona cities included in this study. Requests for data utilized in this study should be made directly to the Arizona Department of Water Resources and the individual agencies listed in Table 1.

References

Baker, J. E. 2017. Subsidies for succulents: Evaluating the Las Vegas cash-for-grass rebate program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Environmental Economics Program.
Brauman, K., B. D. Richter, S. Postel, M. Malsy, and M. Florke. 2016. “Water depletion: An improved metric for incorporating seasonal and dry-year water scarcity into water risk assessments.” Elementa 4: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000083.
Campisano, A., et al. 2017. “Urban rainwater harvesting systems: Research, implementation and future perspectives.” Water Res. 115 (May): 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.056.
Chang, H., S. Praskievicz, and H. Parandvash. 2014. “Sensitivity of urban water consumption to weather and climate variability at multiple temporal scales: The case of Portland, Oregon.” Int. J. Geospatial Environ. Res. 1 (1): 7.
Chinnasamy, C. V., M. Arabi, S. Sharvelle, T. Warziniack, C. D. Furth, and A. Dozier. 2021. “Characterization of municipal water uses in the contiguous United States.” Water Resour. Res. 57 (6): e2020WR028627. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028627.
Cohen, M. 2011. Municipal deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute.
Cohen, M., J. Christian-Smith, and J. Berggren. 2013. Water to supply the land: Irrigated agriculture in the Colorado River Basin. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute.
Danilenko, A., E. Dickson, and M. Jacobsen. 2010. Climate Change and urban water utilities: Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank Sustainable Development Network.
Fountain, H. 2022. “Where lawns are outlawed (and dug up, and carted away).” New York Times, May 3, 2022.
Glenn, E. P., C. Lee, R. Felger, and S. Zengel. 1996. ““Effects of water management on the wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico.” Conserv. Biol. 10 (4): 1175–1186. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041175.x.
Guhathakurta, S., and P. Gober. 2007. “The impact of the Phoenix urban heat island on residential water use.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 73 (3): 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708977980.
Hindi, S. 2022. “Grass lawns, golf courses and fountains could face limits under Aurora water-saving proposal.” Denver Post, June 3, 2022.
Milly, P. C., and K. A. Dunne. 2020. “Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation.” Science 367 (6483): 1252–1255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187.
Partlow, J. 2022. “In worsening drought, Southern California water restrictions take effect.” Washington Post, June 1, 2022.
Paschalis, A., T. C. Chakraborty, S. Fatichi, N. Meili, and G. Manoli. 2021. “Urban forests as main regulator of the evaporative cooling effect in cities.” AGU Adv. 2 (2): e2020AV000303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000303.
Richter, B. 2022. “The (Nearly) lost art of catching rain.” Accessed June 9, 2022. https://www.sustainablewaters.org/the-nearly-lost-art-of-catching-rain/.
Richter, B. D., et al. 2013. “Tapped out: How can cities secure their water future?” Water Policy 15 (3): 335–363. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.105.
Richter, B. D., K. Benoit, J. Dugan, G. Getacho, N. LaRoe, B. Moro, T. Rynne, M. Tahamtani, and A. Townsend. 2020. “Decoupling urban water use and growth in response to water scarcity.” Water 12 (10): 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868.
Richter, B. D., E. M. Powell, T. Lystash, and M. Faggert. 2016. “Protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems.” Chap. 7 in Water policy and planning in a variable and changing climate, edited by K. A. Miller, A. F. Hamlet, D. S. Kenney, and K. T. Redmond. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Robbins, J. 2021. “A quiet revolution: Southwest cities learn to thrive amid drought.” Accessed June 9, 2022. https://e360.yale.edu/features/a-quiet-revolution-southwest-cities-learn-to-thrive-amid-drought.
Southern Nevada Water Authority. 2021. 2021 water resources plan. Las Vegas: Southern Nevada Water Authority.
Stoker, P., and R. Rothfeder. 2014. “Drivers of urban water use.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 12 (Jul): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.03.002.
Udall, B., and J. Overpeck. 2017. “The twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (3): 2404–2418. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019638.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2012. “Colorado River Basin water supply and demand study.” Accessed December 3, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy/finalreport/Executive%20Summary/CRBS_Executive_Summary_FINAL.pdf.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2019. “Agreement concerning Colorado River drought contingency management and operations exhibit 1.” Accessed December 3, 2022. https://go.nature.com/2OKDLhO.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2021. “Reclamation announces 2022 operating conditions for Lake Powell and Lake Mead.” Accessed June 9, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/#/news-release/3950.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022a. “Colorado River Basin.” Accessed August 13, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/ColoradoRiverBasin/.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022b. “Colorado River Basin natural flow and salt data.” Accessed August 16, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/NaturalFlow/documentation.html.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022c. “Colorado River system/basin—Consumptive uses and losses reports.” Accessed October 14, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/uc/DocLibrary/reports.html.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022d. “Water accounting reports.” Accessed May 23, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/wtracct.html.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022e. “Water operations: Historic data.” Accessed June 9, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/rsvrWater/HistoricalApp.html.
USEPA. 2022. “A closer look: Temperature and drought in the Southwest.” Accessed August 16, 2022. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/southwest.
Wheeler, K., et al. 2021. Alternative management paradigms for the future of the Colorado and Green Rivers. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Wheeler, K. G., B. Udall, J. Wang, E. Kuhn, H. Salehabadi, and J. C. Schmidt. 2022. “What will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?” Science 377 (6604): 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4452.
Williams, A. P., B. I. Cook, and J. E. Smerdon. 2022. “Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021.” Nat. Clim. Change 12 (3): 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149Issue 2February 2023

History

Received: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted: Oct 21, 2022
Published online: Dec 15, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 15, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share