Technical Papers
Nov 25, 2022

Identification of Clandestine Groundwater Pollution Sources in Aquifer Polluted with BTEX

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149, Issue 2

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges in characterizing clandestine groundwater pollution sources is correctly estimating the number of such sources and their physical locations. Indiscreet underground disposal of toxic waste leading to groundwater pollution is widespread, and it is extremely difficult to detect the number of such sources and their locations. In this study, a real-life scenario of groundwater pollution in suburban New South Wales, Australia, is solved using a simulated annealing (SA)–based linked simulation optimization (LSO) technique with Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX). The developed LSO considers the number of pollutant sources and their locations as explicit unknowns. This overcomes a crucial limitation in the earlier methods that limited the search to a few known potential source locations. The results show the applicability of the developed methodology to real-life groundwater pollution problems without making limiting assumptions about the number of sources or potential source locations being known, which has not been addressed to date.

Practical Applications

The developed methodology can potentially improve the process of remediation of polluted groundwater aquifers by simultaneously identifying the number of pollution source locations and release flux histories. The results of the study can be used to assist remediation engineers in developing an appropriate reclamation approach for a polluted aquifer, where knowledge of groundwater pollutant source characteristics is vital. The suggested method will aid in holding polluters accountable, contributing to predictions about the fate and movement of pollution, and developing a strategy for monitoring compliance. When implementing the results from the modeling technique to real-life scenarios of groundwater pollution, the equifinality of the solution cannot be entirely ruled out. The accuracy of the results is governed by assumptions and simplifications made in the model to simulate the aquifer response. Even the model calibration is dependent on the availability of data, which may be noisy and erroneous, resulting in nonunique solutions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Atmadja, J., and A. C. Bagtzoglou. 2001a. “Pollution source identification in heterogeneous porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 37 (8): 2113–2125. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000223.
Atmadja, J., and A. C. Bagtzoglou. 2001b. “State of the art report on mathematical methods form groundwater pollution source identification.” Environ. Forensics 2 (3): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1006/enfo.2001.0055.
Bashi-Azghadi, S. N., R. Kerachian, M. R. Bazargan-Lari, and K. Solouki. 2010. “Characterizing an unknown pollution source in groundwater resources systems using PSVM and PNN.” Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (10): 7154–7161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.019.
Chakraborty, A., and O. Prakash. 2020. “Identification of clandestine groundwater pollution sources using heuristics optimization algorithms: A comparison between simulated annealing and particle swarm optimization.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 192 (12): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08691-7.
Chakraborty, A., and O. Prakash. 2021a. “Characterization of groundwater pollution sources by kriging based linked simulation optimization.” GEOMATE J. 20 (81): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.21660/2021.81.6209.
Chakraborty, A., and O. Prakash. 2021b. “Identification of clandestine groundwater pollution source locations and their release flux history.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 626 (1): 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/626/1/012003.
Chang, Z., W. Lu, and Z. Wang. 2021. “A differential evolutionary Markov chain algorithm with ensemble smoother initial point selection for the identification of groundwater contaminant sources.” J. Hydrol. 603 (Jun): 126918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126918.
Datta, B., M. Amirabdollahian, R. Zuo, and O. Prakash. 2016a. “Groundwater contamination plume delineation using local singularity mapping technique.” GEOMATE J. 11 (25): 2435–2441. https://doi.org/10.21660/2016.25.5157.
Datta, B., F. Durand, S. Laforge, O. Prakash, H. K. Esfahani, S. Chadalavada, and R. Naidu. 2016b. “Preliminary hydrogeologic modeling and optimal monitoring network design for a contaminated abandoned mine site area: Application of developed monitoring network design software.” J. Water Resour. Prot. 8 (1): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.81005.
Datta, B., C. Petit, M. Palliser, H. K. Esfahani, and O. Prakash. 2017. “Linking a simulated annealing based optimization model with PHT3D simulation model for chemically reactive transport processes to optimally characterize unknown contaminant sources in a former mine site in Australia.” J. Water Resour. Prot. 9 (5): 432–454. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.95028.
Datta, B., O. Prakash, P. Cassou, and M. Valetaud. 2014. “Optimal unknown pollution source characterization in a contaminated groundwater aquifer: Evaluation of a developed software tool.” J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 2 (5): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.25007.
Dey, S., and O. Prakash. 2022. “Coupled sharp-interface and density-dependent model for simultaneous optimization of production well locations and pumping in coastal aquifer.” Water Resour. Manage. 36 (7): 2327–2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03145-w.
Dhar, A., and B. Datta. 2009. “Logic-based design of groundwater monitoring network for redundancy reduction.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 136 (1): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2010)136:1(88).
Dokou, Z., and G. F. Pinder. 2009. “Optimal search strategy for the definition of a DNAPL source.” J. Hydrol. 376 (3–4): 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.062.
Gómez-Hernández, J. J., and T. Xu. 2021. “Contaminant source identification in aquifers: A critical view.” Math. Geosci. 54 (2): 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09976-4.
Gorelick, S. M., B. Evans, and I. Remson. 1983. “Identifying sources of groundwater pollution: An optimization approach.” Water Resour. Res. 19 (3): 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i003p00779.
Guneshwor, L., T. I. Eldho, and A. Vinod Kumar. 2018. “Identification of groundwater contamination sources using meshfree RPCM simulation and particle swarm optimization.” Water Resour. Manage. 32 (4): 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1885-1.
Guo, J. Y., W. X. Lu, Q. C. Yang, and T. S. Miao. 2019. “The application of 0–1 mixed integer nonlinear programming optimization model based on a surrogate model to identify the groundwater pollution source.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 220 (Nov): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.11.005.
Gurbuz, F., J. S. Metcalf, G. A. Codd, and A. G. Karahan. 2012. “Evaluation of enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the determination of microcystins in cyanobacteria.” Environ. Forensics 13 (2): 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2012.676596.
Hou, Z., W. Lu, H. Chu, and J. Luo. 2015. “Selecting parameter-optimized surrogate models in DNAPL-contaminated aquifer remediation strategies.” Environ. Eng. Sci. 32 (12): 1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2015.0055.
Jha, M., and B. Datta. 2012. “Three-dimensional groundwater contamination source identification using adaptive simulated annealing.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 18 (3): 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000624.
Jha, M. K., and B. Datta. 2011. “Simulated annealing based simulation-optimization approach for identification of unknown contaminant sources in groundwater aquifers.” Desalin. Water Treat. 32 (1–3): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2681.
Jiang, X., W. Lu, Z. Hou, H. Zhao, and J. Na. 2015. “Ensemble of surrogates-based optimization for identifying an optimal surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation strategy at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites.” Comput. Geosci. 84 (Mar): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.003.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science 220 (4598): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
Leichombam, S., and R. K. Bhattacharjya. 2018. “New hybrid optimization methodology to identify pollution sources considering the source locations and source flux as unknown.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 23 (1): 04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000431.
Mahar, P. S., and B. Datta. 1997. “Optimal monitoring network and ground-water–pollution source identification.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 123 (4): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:4(199).
McDonald, M. G., and A. W. Harbaugh. 1988. Vol. 6 of A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Washington, DC: USGS.
Neupane, R., and B. Datta. 2021. “Optimal characterization of unknown multispecies reactive contamination sources in an aquifer.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 26 (11): 04021035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002134.
Prakash, O., and B. Datta. 2013. “Sequential optimal monitoring network design and iterative spatial estimation of pollutant concentration for identification of unknown groundwater pollution source locations.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 185 (7): 5611–5626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2971-8.
Prakash, O., and B. Datta. 2014a. “Encapsulating the role of solution response space roughness on global optimal solution: Application in identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources.” Open J. Optim. 3 (3): 26–41. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojop.2014.33004.
Prakash, O., and B. Datta. 2014b. “Multiobjective monitoring network design for efficient iden-525tification of unknown groundwater pollution sources incorporating genetic programming–based monitoring.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (11): 04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000952.
Prakash, O., and B. Datta. 2015. “Optimal characterization of pollutant sources in contaminated aquifers by integrating sequential-monitoring-network design and source identification: Methodology and an application in Australia.” Hydrogeol. J. 23 (6): 1089–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1292-8.
Rajeev Gandhi, B., R. K. Bhattacharjya, and M. G. Satish. 2016. “Simulation–optimization-based virus source identification model for 3D unconfined aquifer considering source locations and number as variable.” J. Hazardous Toxic Radioact. Waste 21 (2): 04016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000334.
Xing, Z., R. Qu, Y. Zhao, Q. Fu, Y. Ji, and W. Lu. 2019. “Identifying the release history of a groundwater contaminant source based on an ensemble surrogate model.” J. Hydrol. 572 (5): 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.020.
Xu, T., and J. J. Gómez-Hernández. 2016. “Joint identification of contaminant source location, initial release time, and initial solute concentration in an aquifer via ensemble Kalman filtering.” Water Resour. Res. 52 (8): 6587–6595. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019111.
Yan, S., and B. Minsker. 2006. “Optimal groundwater remediation design using an adaptive neural network genetic algorithm.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (5): W05407. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004303.
Yeh, W. W.-G. 1986. “Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem.” Water Resour. Res. 22 (2): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004303.
Zheng, C., and P. P. Wang. 1999. Mt3dms: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user’s guide. Tuscaloosa, AL: Alabama Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149Issue 2February 2023

History

Received: Sep 29, 2020
Accepted: Sep 29, 2022
Published online: Nov 25, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 25, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Anirban Chakraborty [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihta, Patna 801106, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Om Prakash, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihta, Patna 801106, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share