Technical Papers
Oct 18, 2024

Assessment of Influential Factors on Commute and Life Satisfaction in a Historic Campus-Adjacent Environment: Evidence from a Comparison Study of Twin Cities

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 151, Issue 1

Abstract

The prevailing social-spatial disorder within urban settings has become pervasive, particularly in the misalignment between policy formulation and social perception. This underscores the potential for effectively promoting sustainable comprehensive planning coordination by measuring commute and life satisfaction metrics. However, more comprehensive research on commute and life satisfaction in complex historical environments and delving into nuanced analyses of the intricate relationships is needed. This study employed Nanjing University and Soochow University in China as a compelling case study, utilizing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to meticulously analyze data from stakeholders’ questionnaires. The research results reveal that personal attributes and community environment impact life satisfaction significantly, particularly with the variables of emotional stability and community services. It also confirms the importance of cultural and educational elements in enhancing individuals’ perceptions. Notably, variations in influencing factors on satisfaction levels are observed across diverse historical campus-adjacent environments (HCAEs), revealing complexities in satisfaction determinants. Additionally, the contradictory relationship between commuting and life satisfaction is evident, underscoring the nonlinear characteristics within satisfaction impact factors. This study elucidates the intricate mechanisms governing satisfaction perceptions in HCAEs, providing reliable guidance and insights for urban regeneration policies and planning decision-making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Social Science Foundation of Suzhou (Grant No. Y2024LX049), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20CTY013), the Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligent Planning Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources (Grant No. 20230303), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2022J05193). The authors thank the Nanjing University and Soochow University students for assisting with the data collection for the study questionnaire.

References

Adabre, M. A., and A. P. C. Chan. 2021. “Modeling the impact of barriers on sustainable housing in developing countries.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 147 (1): 5020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000639.
Almashhour, R., and F. Samara. 2022. “Evaluating livability perceptions: Indicators to evaluate livability of a university campus.” Sustainability 14 (19): 11872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911872.
Anglim, J., S. Horwood, L. D. Smillie, R. J. Marrero, and J. K. Wood. 2020. “Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.” Psychol. Bull. 146 (4): 279. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226.
Audrain, C. W. 2011. “The stewardship of campus heritage.” Plann. Higher Educ. J. 39 (3): 18.
Benetti Corrêa da Silva, M., J. Matte, S. Bebber, M. Dalla Santa de Carvalho, S. de Atayde Moschen, and A. C. Fachinelli. 2021. “Student satisfaction from the influence of the built environment, price fairness and teaching care: A study at a community-supported university.” Facilities 39 (11/12): 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-09-2020-0112.
Brown, J. L., R. MacDonald, and R. Mitchell. 2015. “Are people who participate in cultural activities more satisfied with life?” Social Indic. Res. 122: 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0678-7.
Chan, A. P. C., and M. A. Adabre. 2019. “Bridging the gap between sustainable housing and affordable housing: The required critical success criteria (CSC).” Build. Environ. 151: 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.029.
Chang, C.-c., R. R. Y. Oh, T. P. L. Nghiem, Y. Zhang, C. L. Y. Tan, B. B. Lin, K. J. Gaston, R. A. Fuller, and L. R. Carrasco. 2020. “Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window.” Landscape Urban Plann. 202: 103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103874.
Chen, C.-C., and S. Yoon. 2019. “Tourism as a pathway to the good life: Comparing the top–down and bottom–up effects.” J. Travel Res. 58 (5): 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518775282.
Chen, J., W. Gan, N. Liu, P. Li, H. Wang, X. Zhao, and D. Yang. 2024. “Community quality evaluation for socially sustainable regeneration: A study using multi-sourced geospatial data and AI-based image semantic segmentation.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 13 (5): 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13050167.
Chen, J., P. Pellegrini, and H. Wang. 2022a. “Comparative residents’ satisfaction evaluation for socially sustainable regeneration—The case of two high-density communities in Suzhou.” Land 11 (9): 1483. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091483.
Chen, J., P. Pellegrini, Y. Xu, G. Ma, H. Wang, Y. An, Y. Shi, and X. Feng. 2022b. “Evaluating residents’ satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou, China.” Cogent Soc. Sci. 8 (1): 2144137. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2144137.
Chen, J., W. Tian, K. Xu, and P. Pellegrini. 2022c. “Testing small-scale vitality measurement based on 5D model assessment with multi-source data: A resettlement community case in Suzhou.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 11 (12): 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120626.
Chen, J., H. Wang, Z. Yang, P. Li, G. Ma, and X. Zhao. 2023. “Comparative spatial vitality evaluation of traditional settlements based on SUF: Taking Anren ancient town’s urban design as an example.” Sustainability 15 (10): 8178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108178.
Cho, H. M., B. Y. Yun, S. Yang, S. Wi, S. J. Chang, and S. Kim. 2020. “Optimal energy retrofit plan for conservation and sustainable use of historic campus building: Case of cultural property building.” Appl. Energy 275: 115313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115313.
Das, K. V., C. Jones-Harrell, Y. Fan, A. Ramaswami, B. Orlove, and N. Botchwey. 2020. “Understanding subjective well-being: Perspectives from psychology and public health.” Public Health Rev. 41 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5.
Dash, G., and J. Paul. 2021. “CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 173: 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092.
Gao, Y., S. Rasouli, H. Timmermans, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Understanding the relationship between travel satisfaction and subjective well-being considering the role of personality traits: A structural equation model.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 49: 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.005.
Grant, J. 2002. “Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 68 (1): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977192.
Groulx, M., N. Nowak, K. Levy, and A. Booth. 2021. “Community needs and interests in university–community partnerships for sustainable development.” Int. J. Sustainability Higher Educ. 22 (2): 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2020-0086.
Hair, J. F. Jr., M. C. Howard, and C. Nitzl. 2020. “Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis.” J. Bus. Res. 109: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.
Hami, A., and B. Abdi. 2021. “Students’ landscaping preferences for open spaces for their campus environment.” Indoor Built Environ. 30 (1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19887207.
Han, S., H. Ramkissoon, E. You, and M. J. Kim. 2023. “Support of residents for sustainable tourism development in nature-based destinations: Applying theories of social exchange and bottom-up spillover.” J. Outdoor Recreat. Tourism 43: 100643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2023.100643.
Hanley, S. M., S. E. Watt, and W. Coventry. 2019. “Taking a break: The effect of taking a vacation from Facebook and Instagram on subjective well-being.” PLoS One 14 (6): e0217743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217743.
Hofer, M., E. Hargittai, M. Büchi, and A. Seifert. 2019. “Older adults’ online information seeking and subjective well-being: The moderating role of Internet skills.” Int. J. Commun. 13: 18.
Hoppenbrouwer, E., and E. Louw. 2005. “Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands.” Eur. Plann. Stud. 13 (7): 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500242048.
Hu, J., J. Chen, P. Li, J. Yan, and H. Wang. 2024. “Systematic review of socially sustainable and community regeneration: Research traits, focal points, and future trajectories.” Buildings 14 (4): 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040881.
Huang, J., Y. Cui, H. Chang, H. Obracht-Prondzyńska, D. Kamrowska-Zaluska, and L. Li. 2022. “A city is not a tree: A multi-city study on street network and urban life.” Landscape Urban Plann. 226: 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469.
Huang, J., Y. Cui, L. Li, M. Guo, H. C. Ho, Y. Lu, and C. Webster. 2023. “Re-examining Jane Jacobs’ doctrine using new urban data in Hong Kong.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 50 (1): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221106186.
Hunner, J. 2011. “Historic environment education: Using nearby history in classrooms and museums.” Public Historian 33 (1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.1.33.
Jebb, A. T., M. Morrison, L. Tay, and E. Diener. 2020. “Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span.” Psychol. Sci. 31 (3): 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898826.
Joshi, A., S. Kale, S. Chandel, and D. Pal. 2015. “Likert scale: Explored and explained.” Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 7 (4): 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.
Karji, A., A. Woldesenbet, M. Khanzadi, and M. Tafazzoli. 2019. “Assessment of social sustainability indicators in mass housing construction: A case study of Mehr housing project.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 50: 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101697.
Kock, N., and P. Hadaya. 2018. “Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods.” Inf. Syst. J. 28 (1): 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131.
Lee, S. M., T. L. Conway, L. D. Frank, B. E. Saelens, K. L. Cain, and J. F. Sallis. 2017. “The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighborhood satisfaction.” Environ. Behav. 49 (2): 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515623823.
Ma, G., P. Pellegrini, H. Wu, H. Han, D. Wang, and J. Chen. 2023. “Impact of land-use mixing on the vitality of urban parks: Evidence from big data analysis in Suzhou, Yangtze River Delta region, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 149 (4): 4023045. https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4334.
Maleki, M., and J. Smith-Colin. 2023. “Estimating benefits of microtransit for social determinants of health: A social return on investment system dynamics model.” Systems 11: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11110538.
Marmot, A. 2014. “Managing the campus: Facility management and design, the student experience and university effectiveness.” In The physical university. contours of space and place in higher education, edited by P. Temple, 58–71. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Martela, F., and K. M. Sheldon. 2019. “Clarifying the concept of well-being: Psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being.” Rev. Gener. Psychol. 23 (4): 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880886.
Moè, A., P. Consiglio, and I. Katz. 2022. “Exploring the circumplex model of motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The role of teacher need satisfaction and need frustration.” Teach. Teach. Educ. 118: 103823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103823.
Mouratidis, K. 2018. “Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: A new conceptual framework.” J. Urbanism: Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustainability 11 (1): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2017.1310749.
Mouratidis, K. 2020. “Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability.” Travel Behav. Soc. 21: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006.
Mouratidis, K. 2021. “Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being.” Cities 115: 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229.
Moussa, N. M., and W. F. Ali. 2022. “Exploring the relationship between students’ academic success and happiness levels in the higher education settings during the lockdown period of COVID-19.” Psychol. Rep. 125 (2): 986–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294121994568.
Musa, H. D., M. R. Yacob, A. M. Abdullah, and M. Y. Ishak. 2018. “Enhancing subjective well-being through strategic urban planning: Development and application of community happiness index.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 38: 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.030.
Pagán, R. 2015. “How do leisure activities impact on life satisfaction? Evidence for German people with disabilities.” Appl. Res. Q. Life 10: 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9333-3.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, M. Guaralda, S. Mayere, G. A. Caldwell, and R. Medland. 2020. “University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities.” Land Use Policy 99: 105109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105109.
Peters, T., and K. D’Penna. 2020. “Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations.” Sustainability 12 (17): 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064.
Schimmack, U. 2008. “The structure of subjective well-being.” In The science of subjective well-being, edited by M. Eid and R. J. Larsen, 97–123. Mississauga, ON: Guilford Press.
Schimmack, U., P. Radhakrishnan, S. Oishi, V. Dzokoto, and S. Ahadi. 2002. “Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction.” J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 82 (4): 582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.582.
Serhan, M., and C. Serhan. 2019. “The impact of food service attributes on customer satisfaction in a rural university campus environment.” Int. J. Food Sci. 2019: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2154548.
State of Council. 1988. “The method of household registration.” Chin. Econ. Stud. 22 (1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475220145.
Steinmayr, R., L. Wirthwein, L. Modler, and M. M. Barry. 2019. “Development of subjective well-being in adolescence.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (19): 3690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193690.
Tartaglia, S. 2013. “Different predictors of quality of life in urban environment.” Social Indic. Res. 113: 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0126-5.
Voukelatou, V., L. Gabrielli, I. Miliou, S. Cresci, R. Sharma, M. Tesconi, and L. Pappalardo. 2021. “Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources.” Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 11: 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2.
Wang, Y., X. Yue, H. Zhang, Y. Su, and J. Qin. 2021. “Relationship between urban floating population distribution and livability environment: Evidence from Guangzhou’s Urban District, China.” Sustainability 13 (23): 13477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313477.
Weckroth, M., S. Ala-Mantila, D. Ballas, T. Ziogas, and J. Ikonen. 2022. “Urbanity, neighbourhood characteristics and perceived quality of life (QoL): Analysis of individual and contextual determinants for perceived QoL in 3300 postal code areas in Finland.” Social Indic. Res. 164 (1): 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02835-z.
Wu, F., X. Liu, D. Ni, T. Lu, K. Zhang, H. Pu, Y. Sun, M. Wang, and H. Li. 2022. “Environmental impacts of residential satisfaction of elders in micro-regeneration communities based on PLS-SEM.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Construction and Real Estate Management, 661–668. Harbin, China: ICCREM.
Xu, S., M. Chen, B. Yuan, Y. Zhou, and J. Zhang. 2024. “Resident satisfaction and influencing factors of the renewal of old communities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 150 (1): 4023061. https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4632.
Yin, J., X. J. Cao, X. Huang, and X. Cao. 2016. “Applying the IPA-Kano model to examine environmental correlates of residential satisfaction: A case study of Xi’an.” Habitat Int. 53: 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.12.013.
Zarabi, Z., P. Gerber, and S. Lord. 2019. “Travel satisfaction vs. life satisfaction: A weighted decision-making approach.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195309.
Zhao, M., N. Liu, J. Chen, D. Wang, P. Li, D. Yang, and P. Zhou. 2024. “Navigating post-COVID-19 social–spatial inequity: Unravelling the nexus between community conditions, social perception, and spatial differentiation.” Land 13 (4): 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040563.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 151Issue 1March 2025

History

Received: Dec 23, 2023
Accepted: Aug 29, 2024
Published online: Oct 18, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, Suzhou Institute of Future City Design, Suzhou City Univ., Suzhou 215000, China; Lecturer, School of Art and Design, Suzhou City Univ., Suzhou 215000, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-0851. Email: [email protected]
Pengcheng Li [email protected]
Researcher, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou Univ. of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Urban Planning and Design, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share