Case Studies
Oct 18, 2024

How Land Transfer Affects the Urbanization of Migrant Workers: Evidence from China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 151, Issue 1

Abstract

The transfer of surplus rural labor is crucial for urbanization and rural revitalization in developing countries. This study specifically examines China, which focuses on how household registration reform and land transfer influence the willingness to urbanize. Logit analysis indicates that land transfer significantly deters institutional urbanization, positively influences residential urbanization, and has a marginal yet positive impact on psychological assimilation urbanization. In addition, this study identifies that the land factor is negligible in affecting psychological assimilation urbanization; instead, the inclusiveness and acceptance that is offered by the city significantly enhance migrant workers’ psychological sense of belonging. Heterogeneity analysis highlights varied urbanization settlement preferences among different demographics, particularly noting the distinct tendencies of newer generations, highly educated individuals, those with limited local interactions, cross-regional migrants, and those moving to highly urbanized areas. Based on these observations, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations. These include enhancing basic education in rural regions, upgrading vocational training for migrant workers, broadening the scope of labor mobility, and improving the urban environment in tangible and intangible aspects. Overall, this study enriches the understanding of the dynamics of surplus rural labor transfer and its urbanization implications, which could provide a scientific foundation for crafting more precise and effective policies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data sets analyzed for this study can be found in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/fly9696/data01.git.

Acknowledgments

This paper is the result of the project of the Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund of the Ministry of Education of China (17YJA790001), entitled “Research on the Balancing of Benefits in Migrant Workers” Urbanization and the Rationalization of Fiscal Subsidy Payments.” The authors sincerely acknowledge the support from the project of the Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund of the Ministry of Education of China (17YJA790001).

References

Auvachez, E. 2009. “Supranational citizenship building and the united nations: Is the UN engaged in a ‘citizenization’ process?” Global Governance: Rev. Multilateralism Int. Organ. 15: 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01501004.
Bell, D. E. 1985. “Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty.” Oper. Res. 33 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.33.1.1.
Bollen, K. A., and R. H. Hoyle. 1990. “Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination.” Social Forces 69: 479–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579670.
Cai, S., and J. Wang. 2018. “Less advantaged, more optimistic? Subjective well-being among rural, migrant and urban populations in contemporary China.” China Econ. Rev. 52: 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.06.005.
Chan, K. W., and W. Buckingham. 2008. “Is China abolishing the hukou system?” China Q. 195: 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741008000787.
Chen, C., and C. Fan. 2016. “China’s hukou puzzle: Why don’t rural migrants want urban hukou?” China Rev. 16: 9–39.
Chen, J., and W. Wang. 2019. “Economic incentives and settlement intentions of rural migrants: Evidence from China.” J. Urban Aff. 41: 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1439339.
Chen, M., Y. Wu, G. Liu, and X. Wang. 2020. “City economic development, housing availability, and migrants’ settlement intentions: Evidence from China.” Growth Change 51: 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12416.
Cheung, N. W. T. 2014. “Social stress, locality of social ties and mental well-being: The case of rural migrant adolescents in urban China.” Health Place 27: 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.01.013.
Cohen, E. F. 2011. “Reconsidering US immigration reform: The temporal principle of citizenship.” Perspect. Polit. 9: 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711002787.
Combes, P.-P., S. Démurger, S. Li, and J. Wang. 2020. “Unequal migration and urbanisation gains in China.” J. Dev. Econ. 142: 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.01.009.
Daymard, A. 2022. “Land rental market reforms: Can they increase outmigration from agriculture? Evidence from a quantitative model.” World Dev. 154: 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105865.
de Brauw, A., and V. Mueller. 2012. “Do limitations in land rights transferability influence mobility rates in Ethiopia?” J. Afr. Econ. 21: 548–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejs007.
Deininger, K. 2009. “Moving towards pro-poor systems of land administration:Challenges for land and asset distribution in Africa.” Agricuture Dev. 1: 233–266.
de Janvry, A., K. Emerick, M. Gonzalez-Navarro, and E. Sadoulet. 2015. “Delinking land rights from land use: Certification and migration in Mexico.” Am. Econ. Rev. 105: 3125–3149. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130853.
Du, W., Y. Tong, and L. Che. 2021. “The impact of land policy responsiveness and livelihood capital on the willingness of agricultural transfer of population to permanent urban residents.” [In Chinese.] J. Gansu Adm. Inst. 2: 82–92+127.
Gray, C. L. 2009. “Environment, land, and rural Out-migration in the southern Ecuadorian Andes.” World Dev. 37: 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.05.004.
Hao, P. 2021. “Do landholdings affect social mobility in China? A study of rural migrants in Jiangsu.” Cities 111: 102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102977.
Hargreaves, S., et al. 2019. “Occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Lancet Global Health 7: e872–e882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30204-9.
Huang, X., M. Dijst, and J. Van Weesep. 2017. “Social networks of rural–urban migrants after residential relocation: Evidence from yangzhou, a medium-sized Chinese city.” Hous. Stud. 32: 816–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1240761.
Huang, X., Y. Liu, D. Xue, Z. Li, and Z. Shi. 2018. “The effects of social ties on rural-urban migrants’ intention to settle in cities in China.” Cities 83: 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.023.
Huffman, W. E. 1980. “Farm and off-farm work decisions: The role of human capital.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 62: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924268.
Jain, M., and A. Korzhenevych. 2020. “Urbanisation as the rise of census towns in India: An outcome of traditional master planning?” Cities 99: 102627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102627.
Khoo, S.-E., G. Hugo, and P. McDonald. 2008. “Which skilled temporary migrants become permanent residents and Why?” Int. Migr. Rev. 42: 193–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00118.x.
Knight, J., and L. Song. 1999. The rural-urban divide: Economic disparities and interactions in China, 187–198. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Kung, J. K.-s. 2002. “Off-farm labor markets and the emergence of land rental markets in rural China.” J. Comp. Econ. 30: 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2002.1780.
Lei, M., and M. Q. Zhao. 2017. “Permanent and temporary rural–urban migration in China: Evidence from field surveys.” China Econ. Rev. 51: 228–239.
Li, H., K. Chen, L. Yan, L. Yu, and Y. Zhu. 2023. “Citizenization of rural migrants in China’s new urbanization: The roles of hukou system reform and rural land marketization.” Cities 132: 103968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103968.
Li, J., C. Zhang, and Y. Mi. 2021. “Land titling and internal migration: Evidence from China.” Land Use Policy 111: 105763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105763.
Li, L., and Y. Liu. 2020. “Understanding the gap between De Facto and De Jure urbanization in China: A perspective from rural migrants’ settlement intention.” Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 39: 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-019-09536-z.
Liu, Y., Z. Li, and W. Breitung. 2012. “The social networks of new-generation migrants in China’s urbanized villages: A case study of Guangzhou.” Habitat Int. 36 (1): 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.008.
Liu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Cities without slums? China’s land regime and dual-track urbanization.” Cities 101: 102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102652.
MARA of China (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China). 2020. “The rural vitalization strategy: The key to our efforts concerning agriculture, rural areas and farmers in the new era.” Accessed December 12, 2023. http://english.moa.gov.cn/news_522/202006/t20200603_300459.html.
Melesse, M. B., and E. Bulte. 2015. “Does land registration and certification boost farm productivity? Evidence from Ethiopia.” Agric. Econ. 46: 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12191.
NBS of China (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2011–2020. “Annual statistical reports on national economy and social development, 2011–2020. Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the national economic and social development.” http://www.stats.gov.cn/.
NBS of China (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2023. “National Economy Withstood Pressure and Reached a New Level in 2022.” Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202301/t20230117_1892094.html.
Ning, G., and R. Li. 2016. “An analysis on differences in citizenship attainment for rural to urban migrants with different migration scopes.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 04: 37–47+126-127.
Obi-Ani, N. A., and M. C. Isiani. 2020. “Urbanization in Nigeria: The Onitsha experience.” Cities 104: 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102744.
Palloni, A., D. S. Massey, M. Ceballos, K. Espinosa, and M. Spittel. 2001. “Social capital and international migration: A test using information on family networks.” Am. J. Sociol. 106 (5): 1262–1298. https://doi.org/10.1086/320817.
Pendakur, K., and R. Pendakur. 2002. “Language as both human capital and ethnicity.” Int. Migr. Rev. 36 (1): 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00075.x.
Pflueger, C. E., and S. Wang. 2015. “A robust test for weak instruments in stata.” Stata J. Promoting Commun. Stat. Stata 15 (1): 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1501500113.
Robison, L. J., R. J. Myers, and M. E. Siles. 2002. “Social capital and the terms of trade for farmland.” Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 24: 44–58.
Schultz, T. W. 1975. “The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria.” J. Econ. Lit. 13: 827–846.
Su, Y., M. Hu, and Y. Wu. 2023. “Rural land transfer and urban settlement intentions of rural migrants: Evidence from a rural land system reform in China.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20: 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042817.
Wang, G., and J. Hu. 2018. “A study on the social distance of floating population under double segmentation.” Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 6: 43–54+127.
Wang, X., and Z. Qian. 2015. “Can education promote the transfer of rural land contract management rights? - Based on the survey data of 1120 rural households in Jiangsu, Hubei, Guangxi and Heilongjiang provinces.” [In Chinese.] J. Agrotechnical Econ. 237: 11–21.
Xiao, B., Y. Zhu, and L. Lin. 2020. “Migrants’ subjective social integration and its determinants as a result of the two-way process of assimilation and segregation: A case study of Fuzhou-Xiamen-Quanzhou Urban Cluster.” Geogr. Res. 39: 2798–2807.
Zhang, Y., A. Torre, and M. Ehrlich. 2023a. “The impact of Chinese government promoted homestead transfer on labor migration and household's well-being: A study in three rural areas.” J. Asian Econ. 86: 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101616.
Zhang, Y., J. Zhang, Y. Liu, and P. Zhu. 2023b. “Agricultural machinery service adoption and farmland transfer-in decision: Evidence from rural China.” Front. Environ. Sci. 11: 1195877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1195877.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 151Issue 1March 2025

History

Received: Dec 12, 2023
Accepted: Jul 9, 2024
Published online: Oct 18, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Economic Research Center, Shanghai Univ., Shanghai 200444, China. (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Renhao Cheng [email protected]
School of Marxism, Shanghai Univ., Shanghai 200444, China. Email: [email protected]
School of Marxism, Shanghai Univ., Shanghai 200444, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share